UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 13° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Brown pledges £1bn on jobs for young

Press Association


Reuters

The Prime Minister today announced wide-ranging reforms to boost employment and give people greater guarantees on public service standards.

Unveiling the Government's legislative plans for the year to the next election, Gordon Brown told the Commons the Government would spend £1 billion to create 100,000 jobs for young people and another 50,000 in areas of high unemployment.

In a statement to the House of Commons, Mr Brown unveiled the draft legislative programme which will form the bulk of this autumn's Queen's Speech.

The Premier said: "There is a real choice for our country - driving growth forward or letting the recession take its course; creating jobs for the future or doing nothing."

Promising not to "walk away from the British people during difficult times," he said an Energy Bill would support up to four commercial scale carbon capture and storage demonstration plants.

There would be a £150 million "innovation fund" for biotechnology, life sciences, low carbon technologies and advanced technologies, that would lever-up £1 billion in private sector investment.

Mr Brown said the Government would also treble investment in housing to £2.1 billion.

But Tory leader David Cameron dismissed the plans as "top-down bureaucratic tinkering". He said there was no "price tag" on the package and asked when somebody would tell the Prime Minister that he had "run out of money".

The Prime Minister's statement came after Business Secretary Lord Mandelson indicated the Government will not set out a fresh set of public spending plans before the next General Election.

In what amounted to a mini-manifesto, designed to establish clear blue water between Labour and the Conservatives, Mr Brown said the Government would legislate in the next session to remove the last hereditary peers from the Lords.

A Bill would also provide for the disqualification of peers "where there is reason to do so".

There would be a draft Bill to create a "smaller and democratically constituted second chamber."

On health reforms, he said there would be a guarantee that nobody needing to see a cancer specialist would have to wait more than two weeks. No one would have to wait more than 18 weeks for hospital treatment.

Mr Brown said as the Government sought to move the economy out of recession, it was setting out steps to support growth and jobs.

"In the last two recessions tens of thousands of young people were written off to become a generation lost to work - a mistake this Government will not repeat."

The new initiatives were to be paid for from spending allocations made in the Budget and from "switches in spending" to meet new priorities.

Starting from January every young person under 25 unemployed for a year or more will receive a guaranteed job, work experience or training place.

But they will have an "obligation" to accept that guaranteed offer.

"This is the first time that any Government has guaranteed that jobs and training will be available to young people and, crucially, has made it mandatory for young people that, if there is a job available, to take this work up and have their benefits cut if they do not."

He said £1 billion was being set aside for the future jobs fund that will provide 100,000 jobs for young people, with another 50,000 in areas of high unemployment.

"In total .... we are preventing the loss of around 500,000 jobs."

Mr Brown said the Government would use the autumn's Queen's Speech, the last before an election, to push ahead with new opportunities in low carbon energy, digital technology and bioscience.

The Energy Bill will provide support for up to four commercial-scale carbon capture and storage demonstration plant for Britain.

Between now and 2020 around £100 billion would be invested by the private sector in renewable energy, making Britain a "major global player" in the low carbon market, with "another 400,000 green jobs by 2017".

The Digital Economy Bill will underpin investment in the high-sped broadband network and an innovation fund will provide £150 million of public money to pump prime private investment in new technologies.

He said there would be a new drive to improve the country's infrastructure, with the creation of a new body Infrastructure UK.

An Asset Sales Board will aim to achieve a target of £16 billion in sales to provide money for investment in public services.

"These investments will strengthen our economy and create new jobs. We believe investment by Government and the private sector will enable the economy to create, over the next five years, 1.5 million new skilled jobs in Britain."

But Conservative leader David Cameron responded: "The Prime Minister is living in a dream world, in which investment is going up, spending is going up - when is someone going to tell him he has run out of money?

"People are entitled to ask, simply, what world is he living in?"

He dismissed the Premier's announcements as "a package without a price tag" and "re-hashed initiatives".

Mr Brown said that from next January, all under-25s who have been out of work for a year will receive a guaranteed job, work experience or training place which they will be obliged to take up.

From September, all 16-17-year-olds will receive an offer of a school, college, training or apprenticeship place.

He said legislation in the Queen's Speech will seek to ensure that the British economy is "best placed" to take advantage of opportunities in the industries of the future, including low-carbon energy, digital technology, financial services, bioscience, advanced manufacturing and transport.

This will include an Energy Bill to support up to four carbon capture and storage power plants to help make Britain a "major global player in the low carbon market".

Private sector investment in low carbon energy can be expected to reach £100 billion by 2020, while more than one million could be employed in the sector by 2017, he said.

A Digital Economy Bill will pave the way for universal broadband access by 2012 and a nationwide high-speed network by 2016.

And a new £150 million Innovation Fund will "lever in" £1 billion of private money for the hi-tech sector.

These and other measures would help create 1.5 million new skilled jobs in Britain over the next five years.

Mr Brown said that, by reallocating funds, the Government would more than treble investment in housing to £2.1 billion, financing 110,000 affordable homes over 24 months.

Local authorities are to be given new powers to give priority to local people on the social housing waiting lists and there will be a consultation on changes to allow them to retain all proceeds from council house sales and rent.

Mr Brown said a Financial Services and Business Bill would take forward "far-reaching" reforms of financial supervision triggered by the economic crisis, including a ban on unsolicited credit card cheques.

The new public service "entitlements" will largely replace Labour's flagship programme of targets pursued under Tony Blair.

NHS patients will have enforceable entitlements to prompt treatment and care, including a guaranteed two-week maximum wait to see a cancer specialist, a free health check for all over-40s and a limit of 18 weeks on the waiting list for hospital treatment.

Parents will be given a guarantee of "individually tailored education" for their child, with personal tutoring for all those who need it.

And residents will be given more power to hold local police to account at monthly beat meetings, to have a say on CCTV use in their neighbourhoods and to vote on how offenders "pay back" to their communities.

A Policing, Crime and Private Security Bill will give officers more time on the beat by cutting paperwork.

And the points-based immigration system will be extended to probationary citizenship, ensuring that migrants who contribute to society have a better chance of gaining British citizenship.

On Lords reform, Mr Brown said that in the next session the Government will legislate to "remove the hereditary principle from the second chamber", along with a draft bill for a "smaller and democratically constituted" upper house.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Jobs for the young
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 03:57 pm (UTC)
Unless these jobs for young people require no work experience and will give them the skills to obtain future employment then it will not benefit most young people.

While increasing the number of litter pickers may make the country tider it will not give the young greater career prospects.
Re: Jobs for the young
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:24 pm (UTC)
nail hit on head
Jobs for the Young
[info]mosessage wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:14 pm (UTC)
Do you remember a short time ago when Gord. promised a 6-month internship for all graduates.
He didn't deliver on that promise, so why should we believe this one?
jobs
[info]alpha1234445 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:18 pm (UTC)
"obligation" to accept? so if an unemployed phd graduate is offered a job as an unskilled laborer, she will have to accept? Who will determine the appropriateness of the offers?

That sounds like a communist system which will encourage comments that the best placements are offered to politically acceptable candidates
Re: jobs
[info]jrlb1 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:34 pm (UTC)
I think if you have not had a job for a year and are still unemployed, by then weather you are a PHD or not, a job is a job. But to be honest, do you think this offer is dedicated to people with degrees!? No, it is for the youths of the bation, who live in council houses doing nothing with their time because we give them money. Not for hard working graduates.
Re: jobs
[info]brossen99 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:41 pm (UTC)
Its the Corporate Nazi system !
Money from where?
[info]nomadicnomad wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:18 pm (UTC)
We are bankrupt you cretin!

For Christ's sake!
Re: Money from where?
[info]jrlb1 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:40 pm (UTC)
do you not think the money he is investing will be returned to us by the lower use of benefits? by making all 16- 17 year olds go to school/college and all under 25's earn their own living, dont you think that the money we would have had to waste on their lazyness by giving them benifits because they were to lazy to get a job, will be made back in the long run? We are breeding a lazy, useless nation by letting them do nothig and live off benefits, whereas by cleverly introducing this ised, Brown is creating a solution to a long brewing and potentially fatal problem to our country.
Re: Money from where?
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:27 pm (UTC)
accurately and concisely put
[info]dnmurphy wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:40 pm (UTC)
They have tried all this before and failed before. Job schemes are political not economic. the housing scheme is probably useful, but a pitiful drop in a very large ocean.

Wasteful pointless and stupid, just the usually headline grabbing rubbish.
Whose momey ?
[info]deimosp wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
I just kind of wish he would remember whose money he is spending. What with the 560bn the other day to help developing countries with greenhouse emissions, the costs of all these rights to public services he is giving people(and they will cost some !!), anybody would think we (taxpayers) were made on money. And now its a 1 bn to children. What about everybody else without a job - are they not worth helping as well.

Will his spend, spend, spend never end. It will end-up with us (taxpayers) all being bancrupt whilst he lives the high life on his government pension. Somebody tell him all this money has to come from somewhere - and somebody he will listen to. King (Bank of England) has tried saying "stop spending" but all that achieved was accusations he was "anti-Labour".
Tinkering around the edges wont stop the demise of the UK
[info]blu_rogers wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:17 pm (UTC)
£1bn will pay 150,000 workers minimum wage for 7 months. Enough time to get their votes perhaps?

Of course Brown's plan will have no lasting impact. For the UK to prosper it has to be become a attractive place for private sector industry again. That means lowering taxes by slashing unproductive public sector spending.

This isnt difficult but it will be unpopular. Tens of billions currently wasted on non-jobs and unemployment benefits must be saved. These people must be forced to do the jobs currently performed by immigrants (migration in effect is the new version of slavery).

Yes, people will have to work harder for less money, but just who do we think we are?
and a hundred billion Trident contribution to WonderTone's personal pension plan
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:50 pm (UTC)
not to mention trillions as direct corporate welfare dole for "Iceland in The Thames" (Spiegel), or the thrirty five trillion of looted North Sea assets, or the looted family silver... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTbdnNgqfs8
Just a suggestion
[info]capandtr8tors wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:40 pm (UTC)
How about one of those youths get Gordon's job, they could probably do a better job and cost much less money.
Gord grief !!
[info]achmelchett wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:45 pm (UTC)
Maggie's Farm comes to mind as does Do Nothing funny though its usually Pearl's Cafe
Jobs for the young - or - Bribes for the young -
[info]rustigjongens wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:28 pm (UTC)
Pathetic idea by a pathetic Prime Minister, where does he really think the money is going to come from?. what about his previous announcements about creating jobs, what happened to that woeful idea?.

This comes straight after his plan to build new homes, which I estimate worked out at 20,000 pound to build each house and buy the land to build the property on!.

Whilst I am having a dig at Brown, perhaps he could advise me what he is going to do about the almost 3 million people currently unemployed?, do they count?, or does he think that he can gain 100,000 voters with bribes?.
PUT IT BACK.
[info]chipmem1 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:38 pm (UTC)

Get rid of council housing, put it back.
Get rid of the apprentice, put it back.
Get rid of costed education, put it back.
Get rid of manufacturing ,,, aha

I need a prescription, but they havn't PUT IT BACK.
I need free dentistry, but they havn't PUT IT BACK.
I need free roads, But they havn't PUT IT BACK.
I hate means testing, but they havn't PUT IT BACK.
I need free care homes, but they havn't PUT IT BACK.

All these free services lost and now 20 years later we have a debt at 54% of GDP.

Where did the money go ?
Re: PUT IT BACK.
[info]ralph23 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:41 pm (UTC)

This is a moronic rant.

Whenever an opinion poll asks people if their own local experience of the NHS, education, crime reduction etc has improved over the last 12 years, the vast majority say YES. Then they go and diss the politicians who brought it about. That's where the money's gone. And people have had jobs for the last 12 years as well. You can't just airbrush those years away. People lived better lives for 12 years. Lives were transformed. Not that you would know it, reading the crap on these newspaper blogs.
[info]brossen99 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:38 pm (UTC)
Gordon Browns pledge to find work or training for all unemployed for a year people under 25 looks pretty commendable on face value, but do the wheels come off when you look at the probable detail.

Even though well educated, a 19 year old unemployed friend of mine was offered a part time job cleaning at some DIY store, only about 15 hours a week and of course through a parasitic employment agency. His projected weekly wage came out at less than his 50 quid a week dole, and when you take into account traveling costs ( be it only shoe leather ) virtual slavery. I believe that after thinking about it he gave back word on the job, not worth starting since he was hoping to go into further education in September.

Browns jobs for the under 25's plan will give the parasitic employment agencies the license to destroy full time cleaning jobs ( and the like ) once open to people of all ages and divide them up into part time packages to exploit the under 25's. It is patently obvious that the full rate minimum wage will be undermined, real businesses won't gain anything because the employment agencies will be charging them well over the odds for employing people direct.

Once again Brown is promoting a welfare state for the stock market parasites, perhaps likely to be defeated Labour MP's are angling for jobs on the board of employment agencies after the next election.
Unjustified cynicism
[info]evantej wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:43 pm (UTC)
The level of cynicism is extremely worrying. As a 21-year-old university student, who has mentored a number of GCSE students earlier in the year, who will be affected by a number of the policies, I can see the immediate benefits.

If you consider that Jobseeker's allowance is £50.95 per week for 16 to 24-year-olds then the students who would drop out of the education system will be forced to continue in some capacity, which will save between £10 and £40 per student per week, and in some cases they will even make money in the short-term. Those questioning where the money will come from are simply ignorant of the current system.

Those who decide to enrol on an apprenticeship are usually given £40-a-week by the government, but they train on the job, and are often paid by an employer too. My sister enrolled on an apprenticeship a number of years ago, and worked four days a week, and went to college one day a week ? as a hairdresser. There is a £10 difference between paying her Jobseeker's allowance, and paying her to train in a job, and then they take some of the investment straight back through income tax as well. The others are covered by Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA), a means tested benefit between £10 and £30 a week, which saves £20 a week on Jobseeker's allowance at worst (students whose parents under £15,000 a year I believe). These students are either destined for low-level services, and taking Btech national diplomas, or taking A levels, and planning to go to university, generally.

The obligation to train or work for those currently in limbo, the 18 to 24-year-olds on Jobseeker's, is a good thing. In some cases it is irrelevant whether or not the jobs and tasks have intrinsic value because it is the stance which is important.

brossen99, however, highlights one of the major issues which stops a number of people going back to work, including my mother at one point. The difference between Jobseeker's and low-level wages is so small that it is simply not worth returning to work for some people.
150 year prison sentence for Brown?
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:05 pm (UTC)
If one fraudster can get a 150 year prison snetence, why not all fraudsters?
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:44 pm (UTC)
1billion for 100,000 jobs, if it works. We are talking 2.3 million unemployed and counting. How many more billion do we need? Never mind how he jumped from 100,000 jobs to 500,000. That is a Prime Minister who cant even come up with a budget because he doesnt know where the economy is from one month to another.
^^^^^^^^^Cougar Circle^^^^^^^^
[info]happybabe1987 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:56 am (UTC)
OH, WONDERFUL!
There are many beautiful mature women and men chatting on that community^^^^^^^^^Cougar Circle^^^^^^^^which designed to help ethnically diverse singles meet new friends and make dates. u will have a more lovely baby not long after....
BROWN HAS LOST CREDIBILITY:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 03:59 am (UTC)
Has anyone told Brown, 'there is no more money'. He has spent it all and put this country into hock for the next 40 years plus. The interest payment exceed the health, defence and NHS budgets combined. Nobody believes a word he says. He is the most dysfunctional PM in history.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date