UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 9°C

Brown says Afghanistan strategy is succeeding

PA

Gordon Brown today insisted Britain's strategy in Afghanistan was succeeding, despite the bloody fighting which has seen the loss of eight soldiers in 24 hours.

The Prime Minister acknowledged said that the past ten days had been "extraordinarily difficult" for British forces with the deaths of 15 troops since the start of the month.

But in a letter to the senior MPs on the Commons Liaison Committee, he said the Operation Panther's Claw offensive to clear the Taliban from central Helmand was succeeding.

"Despite the tragic losses, morale remains high - and I can report the assessment of commanders on the ground: that the current operations are succeeding in their objectives," he said.

"They are having a marked impact on the Taliban in central Helmand, will improve security for the population in the run up to the elections, and will allow longer term work on governance and development to begin."

In his letter, Mr Brown - who is due to give evidence to the committee next week - acknowledged that the losses of recent days had led to questions over whether Britain could succeed in Afghanistan.

But he said that it was essential that the international coalition saw through its commitment if it was to deny al Qaida a fresh foothold in the country from which they could mount terrorist attacks on the West.

"While I know there are some who have questioned our strategy, I continue to believe our strategy is the right one," he said.

"It has been a very difficult summer and it is not over. But if we are to deny Helmand to the Taliban in the long term; if we are to help Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat this vicious insurgency and prevent the return of al Qaida - then it is vital that the international community sees its commitment through."

The latest casualties took the total number of British personnel to have died on operations in Afghanistan since 2001 to 184, surpassing the 179 who died in Iraq.

They included five British soldiers from the 2nd Battalion The Rifles who died yesterday in two separate blasts on the same patrol near Sangin, and another British soldier from the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment who died near Nad-e-Ali.

On Thursday two soldiers, one from 4th Battalion The Rifles and the other from Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment attached to 1st Battalion Welsh Guards, were killed in separate incidents.

Mr Brown's intervention comes amid fears in Whitehall that public support for the campaign in Afghanistan is ebbing away in the face of the lengthening list of fatalities.

There has been a concerted effort by ministers in recent days to spell out the importance of the mission to the UK national interest.

Earlier, Foreign Secretary David Miliband said that Britain's future security was at stake in the battle to prevent the country again becoming an "incubator for terrorism" and a launch pad for attacks on the West.

"This is about the future of Britain because we know that the badlands of Afghanistan and Pakistan - that border area - have been used to launch terrible attacks, not just on the United States, but on Britain as well," he said.

"We know that until we can ensure there is a modicum of stability and security provided by Afghan forces for their own people, we are not going to be able to be secure in our own country."

Mr Brown insisted that the Government placed the "highest priority" on the protection of troops, spending £1 billion on extra armoured vehicles over the past three years.

Over the course of that period the additional funding from the Government reserves for operations in Afghanistan had risen from £700 million to £3 billion.

In addition to the equipment out there, he said that more Ridgeback armoured vehicles and Merlin helicopters were on their way.

However Conservative leader David Cameron bitterly attacked what he said was the Government's failure provide British forces with the equipment they needed - particularly the helicopters that would enable troops to move around in relative safety.

"It is a scandal that our forces still lack the helicopters they desperately require to move around in Helmand," he said.

"Promises of more helicopters in the future are not enough. More helicopters are needed today. More helicopters would save lives."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Portents of doom
[info]earl_of_chatham wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 06:47 pm (UTC)
The loon speaks

Disaster looms

Death comes to fill England's graveyards
Interesting...
[info]alanski wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 07:46 pm (UTC)
So Milliband ...All this to prevent the incubation of terrorists is it? So what's the difference between the Saudi version whose nationals actually took part in the 9/11 bombing. The way their country is run and the Taliban version. The difference is of course the 'blind eye syndrome'. The Saudis take a lot of military hardware from the west. Extremely rich so their lack of human rights are overlooked. Plus without their oil the west would grind to a halt. Somehow I think the likes of Brown and company including the other side of the house of ill repute are missing something. The tragedy is, a lot of folk have died to make this point. The soldiers have no chance they have to do what they're told to do by their superiors. They are being made scapegoats for the real criminals who sent em there. Remember how the government always said in Iraq that it could not give a pull out date as it would alert the enemy. Well they certainly could not give a date in Afghanistan even if they wanted to, it's gonna take years This conflict can only end by talking and political will and none of the present members on both sides know how to do it.
lies and corruption rule
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 10:35 pm (UTC)
So who exactly is the chief clown working for? BP? Shell? Do they really think they are going to get that oil pipeline built through Afghanistan to transport cut-price Central Asian oil to the West via the Indian Ocean?

Brown will continue to lie until he gets thrown out, after which he will get his reward from the real powers that be for sabotage and murder he is currently orchestrating via a few extra directorships, or a UN position.

The entire system is as corrupt as hell
Re: lies and corruption rule
[info]alanski wrote:
Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 07:39 am (UTC)
We will only know the answer to that question when he finally leaves the HoC then we will see what jobs he's offered and therefore what his motives/agenda actually was. One thing he will not be doing is the priesthood.
[info]replica_bags wrote:
Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 06:50 pm (UTC)
Designer replica handbags like Coach bags,Burberry handbag, Hermes bags, Gucci handbags, Tiffany bag, Christian Dior bags,Chanel handbags, Chloe handbags, Dolce & Gabbana bags,Fendi handbag,Prada handbags and sandals shoes are available at our site. All replica bags sold by thereplcabags.com come from the finest manufacturers and are guaranteed to bemade with premium materials and inspected by a very careful quality control. We are fully confident you will be pleased with your product and quality of customer service!

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date