UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 8° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Cabinet 'rivals' rally to Brown's defence

By Michael Savage, Political Correspondent

Alan Johnson said Gordon Brown was the right man 'for these times'

PA

Alan Johnson said Gordon Brown was the right man 'for these times'

Senior cabinet figures were desperately rallying around Gordon Brown yesterday, with the two men tipped as favourites to succeed Mr Brown moving to quash rumours that he could be replaced before the next election.

Both the Health Secretary, Alan Johnson, and Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, said that Mr Brown was the right man to be leading the party and that they did not want the top job. Their endorsements came after the first tensions from within the Cabinet emerged over Mr Brown's leadership.

Hazel Blears, the Communities Secretary, had described the Government's performance under Mr Brown as "lamentable", adding that it needed to be more "human". Mr Brown's decision to block the right of thousands of former Gurkhas to settle in Britain had put the Government "on the wrong side of the British sense of fair play, and no party can stay there for long without dire consequences," she said. A Commons defeat over the plan was swiftly followed by the embarrassing abandonment of Mr Brown's reforms to MPs' expenses.

Mr Brown now faces pressure to scrap plans to part-privatise Royal Mail. A vote on the reforms had been planned after the local and European elections in June, but with more than 100 Labour MPs opposing the plan, Mr Brown could be defeated. The Government has denied that plans are afoot to abandon the reforms.

Mr Johnson, tipped as a possible unity candidate should Mr Brown be forced out, said he had no aspirations for the leadership, adding that Mr Brown was the right man "for these times". But he was careful not to rule out the possibility. "I am not saying there are no circumstances," he told the BBC. "I am not driven by this ambition. I want to be part of a good Government and I want it to be led by Gordon Brown."

In the past, Mr Johnson has said he believed he did not have the ability to lead his party, stating: "I don't think I would have been good enough, frankly. I don't think I've got the capabilities."

It has prompted suspicions that Mr Johnson may feel obliged to take on the leadership should his party ask him in the future. The former Labour mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, also backed Mr Johnson as the next leader, adding that Labour would perform better at the next election if the Health Secretary took over now.

Mr Straw, seen as one of the few senior figures with the profile to take the party into an election, said Mr Brown was "exactly the right person to be Prime Minister". He told Sky News: "There's not a vacancy and Gordon Brown is clearly the leader. If there were [a vacancy], I would not be standing. I've been pretty clear about that."

Even most in the party who oppose Mr Brown admit it is unlikely he will be deposed before the next election, but believe the question of a change in leader will resurface after the local and European elections, during which Labour looks set for a drubbing.

In her article, Ms Blears also appeared to criticise the Prime Minister's use of YouTube to broadcast his proposed reforms for MPs' expenses. Mr Brown's video has been widely lampooned for his stilted manner and oddly timed smiles. "YouTube if you want to," she said. "But it is no substitute for knocking on doors or setting up a stall in the town centre."

After speaking to Mr Brown by phone on Saturday, Ms Blears rushed out a statement, saying she wanted "to make it clear that the Prime Minister enjoys my 100 per cent support. Any suggestion that I intended what I wrote as criticism of him or his leadership is completely wrong."

Downing Street was angered by Ms Blears's intervention, but Mr Brown's aides are hoping her "clarification" will end the spat. "It was a good thing she was able to clarify what she meant as quickly as she did and as clearly as she did," said a Downing Street source. "Clearly her words were being misinterpreted. The important thing is she took steps to change that."

But rumblings from backbenchers over Mr Brown continued, with one saying he had been "mortally damaged". Some wild ideas are being punted around, such as the possibility of left-wing backbencher Gordon Prentice running as a stalking horse candidate. "He is thoughtful, popular, and would get support," said one admirer.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

WHO WILL BELIEVE THIS DEFUNCT CABINET???
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 05:02 am (UTC)
Who will believe anything Straw and Johnson say? They both pledged in their Labour Party Manifesto not to sell or privatise Royal Mail. They have broken their promises and are trying to defend damaged goods. Their true socialist principals have been sold out to greed and sleaze. I am suprised the CWU still sends the Labour Party money.
They should face facts, their PM and tenure in office are coming to an end. Their usefulness is over. They cannot be trusted to govern this country effectively. They have let the British people down and are not worthy of office.
Whilst all this infighting goes on, thousands are losing their jobs; how many more will be lost today???
Brown can stop this misery and call a General Election. Let the British people decide. But his selfishness and greed prevents him from doing so.
[info]bowesy wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 05:22 am (UTC)
The point is that Brown has taken the party to such lows that who, apart from Harmann, would want the leadership now?

Blears comments on Brown are quite bizarre as she is - although unbelievably - actually part of the government. How pathetic she looks with her massive back track, and brown nosing operation subsequent to the article.

The one comedy that we can actually sit back and enjoy is the self destruction of Gordon Brown - and if you believe in what goes around comes around, he deserves all he gets.
[info]mykleboon wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 05:59 am (UTC)
It would seem that anyone who is "off message", (i.e. tells the truth), is bullied by Downing Street. For example, back in August last year, Alistair Darling said that Britain was facing its worst financial/economic crisis since the war. The government machine then went into overdrive to claim that he actually meant something else - and Darling played along. More recently there have been rumours that Darling wanted his budget to slash public spending - but Brown prevented him from doing so. It would appear that Darling was right on both occasions, but lacked the courage of his convictions. A courageous chancellor would resign and give a sort of Geoffrey Howe speech in doing so. This would be the best thing for the country. Brown would be utterly destroyed.
[info]mad9_man wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 09:42 am (UTC)
quite so! I repeat the quote that I posted yesterday which appears to be a goverment rule - 'never let the truth get in the way of a good lie'
fide et virtute !
[info]mekap wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)

So , what do cabinet members do during a bank holiday? Cut the hedge, mow the lawn, visit family?

Laying awake worrying about an epidemic/ the economy/immigration/the jobless/ repossessions/ the world? NO , they scramble over each other to see who can get into pole position to further damage the confidence we all have in politicians.

Harriet Hardbint has thrown her knickers into the fray too , and Hazel Blears and the utterly useless traitor Alan Johnson who has shown no honour and doesnt even know the meaning of the word.

IF labour members are going to destroy each other , please not in front of us children!!

Where is Frank Field? He could be a very steadying pair of hands for them.

For heavens sake NULAB, CALM DOWN, this magnificent country is in melt down, remember whom you serve.
He is the problem!
[info]fwdinsight wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 07:11 am (UTC)
When the Prime Minister becomes the problem and rumours about his mental health and denials about his being replaced then there is no smoke without fire. Time after time we heard rumours about Nixon, Clinton, Bliar, Major in the past and they all were proven true, though deniel by the resident liars oops spin doctors at the timep. We are witness to the same old thing denial after denial, yet who created the information or the idea in the first place, some innocent cleaner who had not been practiced in the dark arts of lying reporting what they had seen. You go back in 10 years and they will still be cleaning, those that lied will be earmning millions and billions from their dark skills. Ity has gor so obvious to me "I know when they are lying, their lips are moving." If you use this as a test then you will not be far out. The Swine fklu is bad buit many more are dieing of other diseases but swine flu is new and sounds realy bad. Its come at a desperate time for our politicians. They are trying to re- engineer the world and have given our national wealth of 1.3trillion to bankers represented by a few families. To gave yo some idea of the size of a trillion , a million reprersents 7 days of seconds while a trillion = 32,000 years of seconds. So Swine Flu is a wonderful way to hide bad news as the press report it to death. To those who are really concerned about the British nation go to youtube and in the Search box write "Danial Hannan" he is Conservative and also do NOT MISS "Nigerl Farrage" he is UKIP to see how they told Brown a few home truths. Then watch MR Brown. He had this sick crazy grin. Why was these confrontations and the demostrations in the EU Parliament not reported by the British media.
Hazel Blears: right but reckless
[info]catotheoldie wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 07:43 am (UTC)
Labour should not keep Gordon Brown in the forlorn hope that an improving economy will restore their fortunes. The myth of economic competence is well and truly laid to rest, especially after that 'no more boom and bust' boast. Prudence is rumbled. She was in office during the good times but did little to bring them about, nor did she save for a rainy day. She spent, spent, spent.

The only thing that can save the seats of dozens of Labour MPs is a new leader. There is still a year for someone else to make an impact with the voters, and there is plenty of talent to choose from. Do those Labour MPs really want to be looking for new jobs in the summer of 2010?
Labour are running out of time
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 07:52 am (UTC)
The Titanic is sinking, and there is little point in repainting funnels in the short time it has left

Ever since Gollum Brown brought down the curse of Magna Carta, on his head, Zanulabour have been doomed; scandal follows sleaze follows scandal follows bad news follows dissent; the rats start to fight in the sack; we seen this all before, under John Major's government, and just as his slide disaster could not be stopped. Neither can Brown's
Ho Hum . . .
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 07:58 am (UTC)
Q: How many tory abusers and libelers does it take to tell the same untruthful stories . . ?

Ans: 53, 52 to check the past year's nonsenses and another to repost them.

So why don't the rest of you find something useful to do?
Of course nobody wants it
[info]deimosp wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
Given that whoever is in charge when Labour lose the next election big time, wjo would want to take over now. They all know when Labour lose the next election Brown will go and they will have the same chance of becoming leader (NOT PM) then - same group standing for election. Taking over now would give them less that a year being PM then failure and no 2nd chance of getting there again.

Any leadership challenge will take a month or so to start, then some time for a new leder to be elected, so the winner gets a few months as PM. They all know Brown is out come next year - electorate will throw him out. Brown is safe until then and if he is on the same planet as the rest of us, he also knows he is out then (but then maybe he is not that aware of what is happening out here in "real world").
and the sub text should say....
[info]borderreiver1 wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 08:35 am (UTC)
And the sub text is that we have a group of panicking pigs who are in danger of being dragged away from the bountiful trough.
Why!! perhaps we will see in the endgame the entire front bench pinching a submarine from Scotland,and sailing for Argentina during the night having looted museums,and art galleries?

What we have had over the last twelve years is a group of individuals promoted way over their abilities.
An ex-postman,a ships steward,provincial little solicitors whom were only really capable of simple conveyancing tasks,and a whole host of disturbed 'minority' group mouthpieces elected as NuLabour MP's with razor sharp axes to grind.

An these people thought they could successfully run a nation
Why! it must have been like winning the lottery.

Enough said for now-I am too sickened by these scum to further comment on their atrocities against the people of this country.

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/ this morning now stands at over forty eight thousand signatures.
Perhaps there is a message there.
Re: and the sub text should say....
[info]virginia_1976 wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 04:50 pm (UTC)
As the American wife of a British ex-Civil Servant (and as a fully paid-up member, myself, of the Democratic party in the US), it sort of sticks in my craw, yet amuses me at the same time, to watch the Labour party implode much like the Republicans are doing in the US at this present moment.

Ex-postmen, a ship's steward, provincial solicitors and factota ... it all reeks of the underqualified cronyism which characterised the late Bush government.

The difference being that in the US, we had a choice in the elections just passed. Sadly, I think Britain will exchange the above for Hooray Henry upper-class-twit-Tim-nice-but-dim cronyism. George Osbourne Chancellor ... gotta pry him away from the blow and the hos first.
Stalking horse? More donkey derby.
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
If there is to be ANOTHER Labour leadership race this summer, I will be sure to go to Blackpool to watch the donkey derby on the sands. But which one to bet my ass on? The feisty Jenny who will only carry female passengers? The highly unaggressive old Jack who only wins if every other donkey falls over.? The wild-eyed asinine jackass that always makes a balls up at the start? Or the safe pair of odd-toed ungulates that will safely carry you past the finishing post? Get your bets on quick - the current obstinate and unwanted chief donkey is destined for Donkeyheaven.
Bookmakers
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 09:02 am (UTC)
who might accept Alan's ass would most likely be more interested in laying odds on Cameron's post election successor I expect.

How many leaders in 10 years is it - 4 or 5?

Leaving out people like Redwood, davies & co who think they are Tory Leader . .
Re: Bookmakers
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
Don't you just love it when you manage to wind someone up a treat? I always know I've hit the target when it screams back at me!
The wrong people would choose a wrong man when they get exhausted.
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 10:13 am (UTC)
The wrong people would choose a wrong man when they get exhausted.
Both the Health Secretary, Alan Johnson, and Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, said that Mr Brown was the right man to be leading the party and that they did not want the top job. Their endorsements came after the first tensions from within the Cabinet emerged over Mr Brown's leadership
Blears's ridicule of Gordon Brown is a clear sign that his fate is sealed, says Philip Johnston.
Evitable
PRONUNCIATION:
(EV-i-tuh-buhl)
MEANING:
Adjective: Capable of being avoided or evaded.
ETYMOLOGY:
From Latin evitare (to avoid).
USAGE:
"Racers insist they do it 'for the glory', which is a shrewd way of saying they do it for no good reason. This is an Entirely Evitable Event."
Don Kahle; Kinetic Challenge Recalls Rickies; The Register-Guard (Eugene, Oregon); Jul 18, 2008.
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
Life consists in what a man is thinking of all day. -Ralph Waldo Emerson, writer and philosopher (1803-1882) Gordon Chesterman:
Britain's estates are 'social concentration camps'
Did we have this in the time of Margareta Thatcher?
Jails are full houses are nowhere to be seen; the hospitals cannot cope with the Flue, be this swine, duck, chicken or goat and cow mixed. The roads have potholes and no one want to mend these we have no money and Iran is not talking to us, Iraq war is a failures and so is Afghanistan. Tell me where are we going?
Three decades of failed policies have destroyed the life chances of millions living in public
Housing, says a devastating new report. Emily Dugan investigates
Recession blamed as number of banned bosses soars
The number of company directors disqualified for criminal malpractice has soared in the last year as bosses go to desperate lengths to avoid the effects of the recession on their businesses, research released today shows. Is this really UK?
According to a study by the City law firm Wedlake Bell, there was a 72 per cent annual increase in the number of directors of insolvent companies being banned for fraud and theft, as company heads tried to salvage something from their struggling firms.
Bank of America Chief Ousted as Chairman.
What is the point of the stepping down now, many have become bankrupt and with many banks that sank simultaneously, do the never done, throw the globe into a mess of cash shortages. It is same as I steal; give the cash to my brothers and say, ?I am sorry. I am resigning?. It has left all so much short of cash that we are in the miserable state.
We give, we give. In Afghanistan, a police officer?s monthly salary is only $70, which is not enough to live on without taking bribes. This is in most of the countries I men taking the bribes. I am amazed that this Police in Afghanistan do not take bribe. Can you please check this is up, as I doubt this?
The international aid programme is particularly important in Afghanistan because the government has few other sources of revenue. Donations from foreign governments make up 90 per cent of public expenditure. They have the huge crop of Poppy the drug.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

Re: The wrong people would choose a wrong man when they get exhausted.
[info]m_burnstein wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 02:47 pm (UTC)
Your entitled to your opinion even if most of it is flatly false.

I mean really, blaming Labour for holes in the roads, blaming Labour for the drug trade in Afghanistan, blaming Labour for the global economy, making up this "hospitals cannot cope with the swine flu" crap, blaming a police officers salary in Afghanistan on Labour, blaming Iranian international isolation on Labour.

What is the point of him stepping down now you ask? He is allegedly unstable and is politically and socially out of touch. This Anthony Eden situation in No.10 simply cannot be allowed to continue, it is dangerous.
Re: The wrong people would choose a wrong man when they get exhausted.
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 03:44 pm (UTC)
Your entitled to your opinion even if most of it is flatly false.
What is the point of him stepping down now you ask? He is allegedly unstable and is politically and socially out of touch. This Anthony Eden situation in No.10 simply cannot be allowed to continue, it is dangerous.
I am only pointing out the facts as they unfold from the UK papers All know that we have problems we are trying to sort these out in the best posible manner
"the best person for the job"
[info]robtepoz wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 10:22 pm (UTC)
So say many of the govt ministers about Gordon Brown - as they lurch, flapping from one studio or one journalist to another. If he is the "best" person for the job then what does that say about the quality and talent of the rest of the Labour MP's. Could it be that he has to be the only person who must face the electorate and take the blows ..is that what the minister are really saying? The vultures wait in the trees while the prey slowly weakens and life ebbs away. The vulture is clear about its intentions - they are the best birds for the job. What job?

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date