UK

12° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Cameron apologises over Wikipedia change

By James Tapsfield, Press Association

David Cameron apologised today after one of his staff changed the Wikipedia entry for artist Titian to try to win a bizarre argument with Gordon Brown.

But the Tory leader still insisted he was right that the painter died at 86, rather than living to 90 as the Prime Minister claimed.

The argument was sparked last month when Mr Brown used an anecdote about the artist to explain the financial crisis.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, he said: "I'm reminded of the story of Titian, who's the great painter who reached the age of 90, finished the last of his nearly 100 brilliant paintings, and he said at the end of it, 'I'm finally beginning to learn how to paint,' and that is where we are."

The remarks were much-mocked at the time, and yesterday Mr Cameron got a big laugh at PMQs by suggesting they showed Mr Brown never got his facts right.

"You told us the other day you were like Titian aged 90. The fact is Titian died at 86," he said.

Initially Wikipedia is believed to have recorded the artist as having died at 90.

But in the aftermath of the exchanges, an overzealous Conservative staffer altered the the online encyclopaedia to try to prove his leader right.

At 12.34pm, Titian's date of death was altered from 27 August 1576 to 27 August 1572.

Numerous changes have been made since, which can be tracked with software on the site. The argument is unlikely to be resolved, because academics have never been able to agree on Titian's exact lifespan.

Speaking on LBC Radio today, Mr Cameron said the member of staff at CCHQ had been disciplined for taking matters into his own hands.

"I was trying to use a light hearted way of making the point that the Prime Minister often says things at Prime Minister's Questions that are not true," Mr Cameron said.

"The person at central office who then altered the Wikipedia entry - putting on the correct information, because I think Titian did die at 86, there's some dispute among academics - but nevertheless that was the wrong thing to do. He shouldn't have done that, he has been disciplined for doing that.

"And the Conservative Party I think rightly has put up its hands and said, 'Look, this happened and it shouldn't have done'."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Wow
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:28 am (UTC)
I'm always astounded how things such as this reaches the news.

"Read all about it: Toffs are arrogant numbskulls who, instead of trying to fix this mess, argue about the death-age of someone who died over 400 years ago..."

Annoying, yes. News? No.
[info]frank_brady wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
There's a slyness in this ploy that reflects very badly on the Conservatives' organisational mindset.

This isn't school. It's real life.
Titian / Cameron
[info]nf_hnf wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:54 am (UTC)
In 400 years time only one of those two will still be remembered and lauded...

How UNBELIEVABLY petty is it for this publiclly paid idiot to quibble over a 'fact' which no-one can prove or disprove, when the sense of what Brown was saying related to the point that people continue to learn throughout their lives through experience (good & bad). It makes me very angry to see any politician sneering insults when the substance of the sneer is such a nonentity.

Cameron would be wise to note the sense of Brown's comments and learn from his experience in this matter.
I have absolutley no confidence he will.
I say let Cameron be Prime Minister. He'd last about 3 months in the current global economic climate...
That would be a lesson he'd never forget...
The Winner Writes The History
[info]proximaking wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:16 am (UTC)
I thought the winners could write the history of any event to suit their purposes in the here and now.

The trick is never to let anyone know you have done it, ........ well perhaps only one other person. We all need a bit of affirmation and as George Wishart said "WE only need ane for a sacrifice."
Silly argument.
[info]rjbo wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
Cameron was silly to pick on this - it makes him look like a pedantic 6th form swot who lacks enough common sense to see the big picture.
No change there then
[info]kankorama wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:21 am (UTC)
A politician going back and altering facts to prove their point? Just another day then.

Remember, Eastasia is the enemy, we've always been at war with Eastasia.
Re: No change there then
[info]1984prole wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
spot on!
PM's questions? No, thanks
[info]dd113 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 12:39 pm (UTC)
Prime minister's questions have become in the recent years an hour of exchange of silly uninteresting remarks and insults and a race of who will come up with the "funniest" joke. Little substance, few real arguments. Is this really what we want from the Parliament? To make us laugh?

-"I was trying to use a light hearted way of making the point that the Prime Minister often says things at Prime Minister's Questions that are not true," Mr Cameron said.
-No, Mr Cameron, I don't believe you. I think you made this comment because you are not capable of making constructive comments that add something to a debate. This is the easy way to make a living in politics. Being "funny".
Re: PM's questions? No, thanks
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 01:06 pm (UTC)
Mr Cameron has scored an own goal. To earn respect he should position himself above this kind of childish comment
Gladiators
[info]spnfl wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 12:43 pm (UTC)
I'd like to see them with pugel sticks thrashing it out atop huge padded stools.
Mr Cameron Needs To Set A Example
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 01:02 pm (UTC)
to earn public respect Mr Cameron should do more than discipline the individual who made the change to Wikipedia. That person has brought the Conservative Party, and its leader, into disrepute and should be sacked.
Cameron
[info]piddle1 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 01:50 pm (UTC)
Titian today, weapons of mass destruction yesterday. Can we ever believe any politician ?
The Answer
[info]soho44 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 02:31 pm (UTC)
I say sack both Cameron AND the aide in question!
Welcome to 1984 at Airstrip One
[info]1984prole wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 04:57 pm (UTC)
I never knew that the real commies in our midst were the Tories. To alter information to suit their lies - totally scary. With their very own Winston Smith altering written information to reflect the lies of the
party.
New Labour may be bad, but Tories are so much worse.
[info]gyhrphy wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 06:16 pm (UTC)
Whose lies are bigger, bolder and more damaging to the economy? Without a doubt, Brown who knows feathers about Titian's art, but likes to show off in the big arena.
Trust
[info]michaelbvm36 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 06:34 pm (UTC)
As one who used to vote Conservative and is now ,firmly, a floating voter with minimal faith in all the political parties , it is abyssmal that falsification of a Wikipedia entry by an overzealous member of central office should occur.
Opinion of all politicians is deservedly pretty near rock-bottom but such petty point-scoring is pathetic.
Cameron and his bevy of old Etonians are flawed slick salesmen who will be a disaster for the UK .
Cameron would do himself. the Conservative party and the country a favour by behaving less like a mindless smart Alec at PMQs and delivering measured counsel and questions that touch the centre of our many problems not flailing about like a debating bobbysoxer peddling personal abuse.
Ok then...
[info]r_seymour wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 06:38 pm (UTC)
Goodness me! David Cameron will really try and use anything to gain more popularity.
Doctoring the facts
[info]hopes_dashed wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 07:54 pm (UTC)
Well well, what else have Conservative central office altered, in order to make themselves look good? And this before they get into office, if they ever do. If this is how they react over something so trivial, it does not bear thinging about what they would be prepared to do over something more serious if they are ever in office.

And Mr. Cameron has the cheek to call Brown a liar. ".......Prime Minister often says things at Prime Minister's Questions that are not true,"

Mr Cameron knows that PMQ's is just a meaningless game. No Prime Minister has ever answered an opposition leaders question. Not in my memory anyhow.
PMQ's
[info]hopes_dashed wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC)
dd113

To be as pedantic as Cameron, PMQ,s lasts for 30 min not an hour.
Goes to show...
[info]smithsfan82 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 08:13 pm (UTC)
Goes to show where Cameron's priorities lie doesn't it? Are there bigger things to be worrying about? Do we really need this toff in government when the guy hasn't done a hard days graft in his life? Is he still riding a bike whilst being followed by a car?
[info]indie_view_one wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:35 am (UTC)
PMQs is just David Cameron being the Public School Bully at the School debating club.

He tries to verbally assault and batter his opponent, showing his sneering contempt in every word.
When his "facts" don't completely stand up, his mates behind the scenes quietly alter the evidence.

All Cameron can do is argue about words rather than real substance and policy.
This is one man I would not trust in a crisis - he is still the P.R. man he was at Carlton Communications.
cr-apology
[info]1in68000000 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 10:30 pm (UTC)
more to the point, this Titiangate Crisis highlights the in
sincerity of recent gushing public apologies for things that either no one really cares about (christian bale saying a naughty word, Rossy Wossy and his side kicky wicky making prank calls) or they are matters that have had such a serious impact on peoples lives (bankers apologizing for dissolving peoples life savings) that saying sorry really isnt enough.

I think apologizing is increasingly being used to justify or admonish far too many things. Perhaps the government should deploy an expensive think tank to study and regulate the appropriate use of remorse. Until that time Cameron should resign. I for one wouldnt be sorry
Like a load of kids in a playground
[info]simonspurrell wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC)
I am tired of Cameron and Osbourne in particular using public school boy japes to win pointless and hollow victories. We want a united 'positively' lead initiative with all parties working towards the same goal of getting us out of this mess. The childish back biting and bickering in parliament succeeds in only making this country look foolish and unattractive as an investment partner. A message to all of the MP's allegedly representing us and this country - "GET ON WITH IT"! Stop playing games agree on a strategy that excludes individual power gains and electoral side swipes and pointless time wasting anecdotes.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date