Cameron calls BNP gains 'desperately depressing'
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
David Cameron has called the BNP's European election gains 'desperately depressing'.
The Tory leader said: "It is desperately depressing. It is obviously a depressing day, for all of us. The BNP are completely beyond the pale.
"They do not even let black and Asian people into their party, they are an appalling bunch of people. It is depressing.
"What the mainstream parties have to do is prove their worth, get on the doorstep, explain to people how we are going to take up their concerns, how we are going to respond to their issues.
"That is the way to beat these dreadful people. I hope that this is the extent of what they can do and they go no further."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
The mainstream parties who voted for 2 illegal and immoral wars that have killed a million people plus on the basis of lies and what's more they knew this.
That is war crimes never mind their collective responsibility for destroying the economy through globalisation and being in the pockets of the Bankers.
Never mind the destruction of the Health service and the Marxist social engineering in our schools and throughout society.
etc etc etc
even though Tories voters gave the thumbs up to the mansions, duck houses and moats
the votes where not gained or lost on european issuesas the local elections were not won or lost on local issues
Of course, not all Jews are Zionists. Far from it. But you can be sure that the BNP will sub-vet its Jewish supporters to ensure that their personal politics match the BNP's and Israel's.
What it seems to have done is give British Jews a sort of exemption from the "indigenous Caucasians" clause in its constitution a bit like the honorary-white status which was given to the Japanese (but not the Chinese) in apartheid-era South Africa: i.e. a concession not a right - and revocable at a moment's notice.
Maybe if they were more inclusive, more people would vote for them in light of the uselessness of the three main parties.
But I don't think the BNP leadership would ever get it past their activists if they proposed dropping the whites-only clause. The French Front National has plenty of coloured members. But the French far Right have never been quite as hung up on racial purity as ours: a result perhaps of us never having experienced a Nazi occupation and seen what the process of racial cleansing looks like up-close.
Between him and Brown & Clegg they have allowed fascist holocaust deniers to represent Yorkshire and the North West at an international level through infighting, inaction, incompetence, titillation and complacency.
No, Labour Party, it isn't about expenses, the system of proportional representation, or lack of women in the cabinet. It is about your corrupt, arrogant party which has killed hundreds of thousands of people, been America's poodle, taken away our civil liberties and bankrupted the country.
Do someting now or not only will we have the (almost inevitable) Tory government, but it will have a massive majority.
NB. Apart from the BNP, there is no other political party in the UK which defines its membership by skin colour.
Now get this. MASS IMMIGRATION, THE EU AND MULTICULTURALISM HAVE BEEN FOISTED ON THIS COUNTRY. LIBERAL/MARXIST TYPE LOSERS ASIDE, THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE BRITISH POPULATION BITTERLY RESENT THEM.
So get your knickers in a twist over the BNP - live with it.
My congratulations to Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons and all the brave BNP activists and candidates for their courage, resolve and fortitude in bringing this victory about.
Leftist thugs - eat your hearts out!
Likewise the BNP is plainly not a party built for the long haul. From what I've seen of its activists over the years "real" politics - committees and paper-shuffling and answering constituents' letters and all the boring stuff - doesn't excite them nearly as much as rambling on about the gas chambers (non-existence of) and attending neo-Nazi rallies in continental Europe. They plainly loathe one another only slightly less than they hate the rest of us, so if held up in any way they soon fall to bickering and excommunicating one another. In fact, although I'd hoped that UKIP (yes, UKIP, God help me!) would do well enough to keep them out of the European Parliament, since they did get in I'm glad that two of them got in and not one, because you can't have a really satisfying party split with only one member.
A shameful day for Britain nonetheless, and I've no doubt the voters of NW England and Yorkshire will live to regret having stayed at home on the 4th. I wonder what the record of attendance of their two new representatives will turn out to be. And how they'll handle their expenses. There'll certainly be many eyes watching them.
A government that doesn't listen to it's people on immigration. That just scoffs and sneers at anyone who disagrees with it. That says anyone who disagrees with mass immigration must be some sort of "Nazi", "fascist", "racist" blah blah blah.
Well, if the corrupt old parties don't want to listen to the people, then we'll just have to vote for new parties that WILL listen. That's how democracy works. If David Cameron finds democracy depressing, then I suggest he finds a different job.
Just remember this fact: If the establishment parties hadn't let millions upon millions of immigrants into Britain in the first place, there wouldn't be any need for the BNP.
i) UNHEALTHY because they have no health service to speak of in their home countries and therefore present a massive burden on public health services. Immigrants are IMMEDIATELY allowed the same level of medical treatment as UK citizens - without having paid a penny in taxes. In New Zealand Canada and Australia prospective immigrants have to take a very stringent medical which includes a HIV test. Any member of the family that does not pass this medical is refused residence. The philosophy here is they would pose too high a burden on medical services. And also why would you have an unhealthy immigrant when you could have a healthy one! The UK does not ask for ANY (yes, ANY!) medical exam - it does not even require an HIV test. It is also interesting to note that immigration activists have successfully demanded that all HIV-positive immigrants be given the same standard of medical treatment as UK citizens.
ii) UNSKILLED and require support by social services. Again, New Zealand Canada and Australia only allow immigrants who are skilled and who fit within certain skills categories. Most immigrants have to have a degree.
iii) VERY POOR and require social housing - in the past immigrants who had been in the country months were places at the top of the housing queue, ahead of UK citizens who had been waiting for YEARS. This fact is often (brazenly) denies by trendy-lefties.
iv) HABOURING RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WHICH ARE STRAIGHT OUR OF THE MIDDLE AGES - including immigration due to so-called 'arranged marriages'.
Labour's irresponsible (some would say treacherous) immigration policy has changed the very character of the UK - you only have to walk down any street to see evidence of that. Labour has become so politically correct that it does not even deport FAILED asylum-seekers. How contemptible of the British people is THAT!
Labour has brazenly refused to set any targets for immigration - even when the economic situation demands it. Look at the the response of Australia to the current financial crisis. It has cut its immigration intake by a significant amount because it places the rights of its people - its citizens above any PROSPECTIVE immigrant - that is just a fair and common-sense approach. Remember, Australia does not accept ANY unskilled migrants so one can appreciate the massive extra burden imposed by continuing unfettered immigration in the UK by people I have listed above.
For too long trendy lefties, in their houses in Hampstead and Islington, have stiffled all debate about immigration by labeling people as "racists" who dare to question it. This might have worked very effectively 10 or 20 years ago but people have become aware of this disgraceful strategy and it will no longer work. Trendy lefties are partly responsible for the failure of entire immigrant communities (more noticeably the Muslim community) to integrate into our society. Trendy lefties, for example, led Hate campaigns against any person who dared to criticize the wasteful practices of councils in printing information leaflets in all known languages under the sun. Now we are paying the price for this. Just look at the treatment of British soldiers returning from battle in Afghanistan by SOME Muslims - they were abused and screamed at when they paraded down the street in what should have been a celebration of their contribution.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. The reason why the BNP have gained such inroads is because of these things. We MUST have a sensible immigration policy where only those who can contribute can have residency.
Well they can start to LISTEN and ACT on peoples legitimate concerns about Labours unfettered immigration policy which has changed the very nature of British Society. They can start by overhauling immigration policy so that it serves the British people. To date, the British people have been serving many immigrants, many of whom cannot even speak English by paying for their medical treatment and unemployment benefit. Australia, for example, has an English language test - prospective immigrants should at LEAST have to prove that they can speak English. How else can they contribute to the economy of an English-speaking country. We should vet all immigrants to screen out those that have religious beliefs which are incompatible with a modern European society. We should start to deport ALL failed asylum-seekers and illegal immigrants - exactly like Canada, Australia and New Zealand does. These things are just basic common sense and are fair. This would be a good start. But the entire immigration policy and process needs an complete overhaul. Labours betrayal of the British people in this matter cannot be allowed to stand.
The Tories will follow suit when they inevitably betray the UK electorate, when they also deny us a referendum on the same issue. Cameron has promised us, if he's elected to government, a referendum 'only' if the Irish vote no for a second time. If they vote yes, then we are stuck with it and only an exit from the EU will save our right to govern ourselves.
Many hundreds of thousands voted BNP in last Thursdays elections and the BNP were not that far behind the main three parties in several areas. Considering the mass media propaganda that exists against the BNP, I think they did rather well. As time goes on and we continue to be crowded by illegal immigrants, the rise in unemployment this will create and the continued erosion of our sovereignty, it is inevitable that more and more voters will turn towards the BNP and UKIP for salvation.
Unless the three main parties start to adopt BNP & UKIP policies, their days are numbered.
Is anyone ready to discuss race openly and objectively? If so, how about getting up to speed tonight by watching a professional documentary on this taboo subject? The film I have in mind, was made in 2008 by a (Craig Bodeker). A commercial filmmaker, with no political axe to grind.
His film: "A Conversation About Race" is (59:00 Min's long) and is hosted on Google.
Here is the Link: http://tinyurl.com/kmc7jc
The authors web address is here: http://www.aconversationaboutrace.com/
>>end of post.
http://cultsha.com/bnp-to-rid-britain-o