UK

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Cameron invites political novices to join the Tory candidates' list

But call for open selection process may be incompatible with leader's demands for immediate election

By Andy McSmith

Conservative leader David Cameron makes his appeal on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show yesterday

GETTY IMAGES

Conservative leader David Cameron makes his appeal on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show yesterday

David Cameron has put out a call to absolute political beginners to apply to become Conservative MPs. He wants outsiders like Joanna Lumley to be added to his party's list of candidates, in a drive to restore confidence in Parliament.

There are seats going for the asking, because four sitting Tory MPs have already been forced out by the expenses scandal. The latest vacancy is the previously solid Tory seat of Bracknell, Berkshire, where the sitting MP, Andrew Mackay, has agreed to stand down at the election after being spoken to by Mr Cameron. The Conservative leader stopped short yesterday of saying that he had actually ordered Mr Mackay to retire early, but said the Bracknell MP had agreed that the game was up after a "very straightforward" conversation.

To be a Conservative candidate in Bracknell, or any of the other safe Tory seats that are suddenly up for grabs, you will not need to agree with Mr Cameron on every issue. You will not need to be a paid up Conservative either. "What I'm going to do today, particularly because there are a number of MPs retiring from parliament, is I am going to reopen the Conservative candidates' list to anybody who wants to apply," Mr Cameron told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show yesterday.

"They may not have had an involvement with the party in the past, but if you want to come in and if you believe in public service, if you want to help us clean up politics, if you share our values, come and be a Conservative candidate." He added that many of the candidates will be chosen in "open" primaries, in which anyone living in the constituency has the right to vote, regardless of whether they are Conservative Party members. This method gives outsiders unknown to local party activists a better chance.

Asked whether he wanted "your Joanna Lumleys or whatever" entering the Commons as Conservative MPs, Mr Cameron replied: "Yes, we've got to open up the talent that is available, and this is an opportunity to do that."

Iain Dale, the Conservative blogger who earlier tried unsuccessfully to be adopted for the safe seat of Maidstone in Kent, welcomed the change but warned that it might clash with Mr Cameron's insistent demands for an immediate election – a demand which he repeated yesterday.

"When you consider that there are already many hundreds of people on the list, who will have comparatively few seats to fight over, they will undoubtedly see it as a bit of a snub – but they shouldn't," Mr Dale said in his blog. "The A-List is effectively dead. If constituencies agree to hold open primaries, they don't use the A-List. And I imagine now that all seats will be forced to hold open primaries anyway."

Similarly to Gordon Brown, Mr Cameron has been accused of inconsistency in his handling of the expenses row, because he has come down hard on members of the old Tory "squirearchy" caught up in it, while seemingly being more lenient towards political allies on the modernising wing of the Conservative Party.

But Mr Mackay was one of Mr Cameron's closest advisers, and had hoped to save his political career by putting himself through an acrimonious public meeting in his Bracknell constituency. Mr Mackay had claimed that a house in Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, where his wife Julie Kirkbride is the local MP, was his main home; but she claimed that they lived in London. Thus they were able to claim for two second homes. Mr Cameron described this yesterday as "one of the more serious cases" involving a Tory MP.

There have also been questions asked about Mr Cameron's own claims for a second home, which came to more than £81,400 over four years, because his marriage to Samantha, daughter of an immensely rich Yorkshire landowner Sir Reginald Sheffield, has reputedly made him a millionaire.

It was put to him at a public meeting in his Witney constituency at the weekend that he is worth £30m. "It's simply not true, absolutely not true," he said yesterday, without offering an accurate figure.

He added: "I have two homes. I have a home in London, which is my main home – that's where my children go to school and my wife works in London as well; and then I have a home in the constituency, which I claim the second-home allowance for. And I've tried always to claim for what I thought was reasonable, so in fact I never claimed for furniture or for food or for decorations or for anything like that."

Other places where members of the public can bid for a safe Conservative seat include: Gosport, Hampshire, where the sitting MP, Peter Viggers, claimed off the taxpayer for a floating duck house; Sleaford and North Hykeham, in Lincolnshire, where Douglas Hogg claimed for having his moat cleared; and Totnes, in Devon, where the MP Sir Anthony Steen said that criticism of his expenses was motivated by jealousy.

*David Blunkett, the former Home Secretary, yesterday denied speculation he was looking to get back into the Cabinet. A spokesman said: "He is particularly irritated by speculation, which he believes is designed to cause controversy about the future of [Communities Secretary] Hazel Blears."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Pinnochio Cameron is a slippery eel
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
It is those voters who do not agree with tory policies, which apart from a free vote on foxhumting are pretty opaque, whom Cameron wishes to attract.

"Vote for Me & I'll Give You Anything You Want Party" Millionaire Leader's mortgage? (After all he biggs up his wisteria repayment, and claims to be washing his party whiter than white . . )

http://snowflake5.blogspot.com/2009/05/should-taxpayer-be-buying-ginormous.html
BNP by the back door?
[info]salford_roy wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
Wisteria Dave really will say anything to be elected.

Does he actually think this will work? To me it seems like the Tories will be opening the back door for BNP activists to sneak in as how else can they vet prospective candidates?

The non-Tory media (of which there is precious little) needs to draw attention to this. It has the potential to be the Militant Tendency of the 21st Century as old Wisteria is making a start on a Tory suicide note by inviting the even harder right to enter and set up camp in his expenses-funded garden
. . . and yes, you too can sneak the system like us
[info]tuskerdeman wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
Good luck to those that aspire to a newer younger elite. They'll be in for the long haul for more public, community and cultural abuses as no doubt awaits us under the Tories.

Even now this smokescreen issue hides even more serious and devious practices within Westminster. Theses issues of public concern promoting furore, debate and distraction hides what is truly happening, by quietly invoking into law, further "legal" abuses to our personal private data whilst our backs are turned.

Big issue, very important, read here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/jacqui-smith-dna-profile-database

Beyond financial charades, corporate abuses, ministers expenses and many other issues that have become public knowledge in recent times, "the people" are denied proper and open debate on our basic freedoms.

We must stop this.

The Executive Branch of Westminster must warrant the closest scrutiny and investigation on all of the events of recent times immediately.

Write to your MPs, form action groups, contact anyone that may assist in putting a stop to this crime against the people.
The LibLabCon continues.
[info]bishbashbong wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
Although I am still shocked as to how many dis-Honerable MP's remain dis-Honerable MP's it seems clear to me that Tony Cameron has his concerns that there maybe too many 'Independents' elected at the next General Election.

So what a great idea to encourage these 'Independents' to get elected with the financial backing of the Conservatives, thereby maintaining the Party Political Rule of the Lib-Lab-Con.
call me dave party members too old to change
[info]mikeknoth wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 12:45 pm (UTC)
hug a hoody Cameron has come out with another meaningless sound bite he may want to open up lists
so what is it not local party activists who select or deselect candidates with the average tory around about70 years oldthe chances of anything happening in the near term are low particularly after moats, duck houses and manor houses they've just carried on where they left off in the 80/90s
IT'S A GREAT SHAME THE OTHER TWO PARTIES STUCK UP THEIR HANDS AND SAID ME TOOTHE TELEGRAOH HAS NOT DECLARED WHICH PARTY HAS THE MOST UNTAINTED MPS
PERHAPS THE INDIE SHOULD DO SO
How About
[info]chipmem1 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 02:23 pm (UTC)

Frank Gallagher.

Actually no, Franks got too much integrity, for politics.

and I bet most Tories wouldn't be seen dead around the Chatsworth estate.

In the case of Julie kirbride , it certainly wasn't
Bromsgrove's Chatworth equivalent...... Charford.

New broom time, sooner the better.
Submitt Your Tender
[info]ian_t_2112 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 06:28 pm (UTC)
Would it not be more fitting in these tough times ,that potential MP's tender for the position. At an election candidates could submit tenders as to how much they would be prepared to do the job for , then the electorate could evaluate the best value person for the job . Of course with an open europe policy, Polish and Bulgarian and other Eastern Europeans (who the govt. constantly tell us are hard working and well educated) , could tender and take part in the election as well , thus ensuring excellent value for money for the tax payer. This is how the rest of us in business in the U.K. have to operate now , why not those in power ......... or am i perhaps missing something ?
Desperate, mate
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 07:10 pm (UTC)
Why the old system seems to think it will make a comeback I don't know. The British people have firmly decided against party politics and representative pseudo-democracy and nothing has changed. I can't see now why becoming a puppet of David Cameron is attractive to someone who has resisted joining the COnservative party to date...
The king's new clothes
[info]mishmos wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 10:32 pm (UTC)
We can see right through this one upmanship fiasco.
What the hell have we got to lose by ridding ourselves of the rubbish tip called parliament.
How they all want reform NOW and not before.
Get rid of all of them and start afresh. Trust not a single one.
The slogan for reform could be "part of the system, then aprt of the problem".
They all knew about the system that allowed MP's to rip us off and the shoddy laws and lacklustre, mealy mouthed attempts at shutting us up.
Education, Iraq, Immigration, absence of real law and order, Health, Rampant building across South of England, Local Authorities out of control and incompetent, Laws passed by Brussels, membership of what was supposed to a trade group and is now a European dictatorship.
This would be agood start.
Playing to the gallery again
[info]johngedwards wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 01:56 pm (UTC)
The rich get richer, the poor get the Tories - God help them!

This country needs strong leadership to apply long term and possibly unpopular policies to get us out of the current global mess the UK is in.

The only real alternative to the present government seems to be the Tories, but their record over the last 30 years proves they are the party of short termism. They will do anything for short term profit or if they think the action will result in votes. In fairness, it may be our political system gives rise to this type of action but reflect on the Tory record and the longer term effect of their policies.

The 70's:
The Tories closed 45% of the rail network. Now, some 30 years, later we are saying we need to expand the rail network! Massive cost savings could have been made without closing routes. The knock on effect of this action was to destroy the skill centre in the heavy engineering home market for manufacturing rolling stock. We now buy trains from Germany - hardly noted for being a low cost economy.

The Tories took us into Europe. Since the 70's Europe has been a continual bone of contention. It was obvious at the time there needed to be tax harmonization on such obvious things as drink. Our entry has been costly but current Tory policy on the future of UK/Europe is unclear.
The Tories glibly state we should control immigration, but it was going into the union that allowed millions of Eastern Europeans to come here unchecked. We are a small country with limited space. Our quality of life is being eroded by the sheer numbers entering the UK and using our services (Health etc.). Another short sighted Tory policy.

The 80's
Saw Margaret Thatcher and the Conservatives liberalize the Financial sector, giving greater freedom and minimum regulation. This allowed the freedom for greedy bankers to pay themselves millions in bonus payments whilst ruining the banks and the world economy.
Extract Queens Speech 1985: Measures will be introduced to establish a new regulatory framework for the financial services sector, which will enhance its efficiency and competitiveness whilst providing greater safeguards for the interests of investors, and to modernise and liberalise the law governing building societies.

Don't mention the mines! We imported 44 million tons of coal in 2008. 25 years ago they said this was a dirty fuel. Now we bring supplies half way around the world. Hardly an advert for Mr. Camerons Green credentials.
Another far reaching Tory policy affecting us all today.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date