Cameron promises crackdown on incapacity benefit
Tory leader to unveil US-style welfare-to-work scheme that would see payments reduced or cut altogether
Sunday 06 January 2008
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
Why David Cameron owes unemployed single mothers an apology
How would you describe an unemployed single mother, with moderate depression, who can't afford new s...
Can we shop our way out of a recession?
The idea that a lot of shopping translates into a healthy economy is dubious. On the three prior oc...
How social networking made public vanity acceptable
When did it become acceptable to brag about oneself publicly?
‘French beer is unknown. We must change that’
Stereotypes die hard. ‘The Very Hungry Frenchman’, the BBC’s current television series following che...
Thousands of sick and disabled people would see their incapacity benefit payments cut by 20 a week under an American-style "tough love" welfare policy to be unveiled by David Cameron on Tuesday.
He will promise that a Tory government would force all 2.64 million people on the benefit to undergo a "fit for work" test. Those capable of work will be transferred immediately to the less generous jobseekers' allowance for the unemployed and will have to look for work to keep that.
Claimants who have the potential to work will be referred to private firms and voluntary groups with expertise in getting people into jobs, which will help them prepare to return to employment. They will have a free hand over their methods and will be paid by results.
The Tories insist that disabled people who are incapable of work will continue to receive incapacity benefit. They will be able to volunteer for one-to-one help from the welfare-to-work scheme. But those with a "non-permanent condition" will have to repeat the "fit for work" test regularly.
Mr Cameron wants to make welfare a key battleground at the next general election. He believes his party can outflank Labour by producing more radical reforms and will accuse the Government of failing to live up to its rhetoric about change. But his proposals will provoke controversy. They are modelled on tough welfare-to-work schemes in US states such as Wisconsin, where benefits are withdrawn from people who refuse to seek work. Although the number of claimants has dropped dramatically, critics say that up to one in three of those who lose their benefits have to rely on emergency handouts from charities.
The Tories' hardline approach to the sick and disabled will also extend to single mothers. At present, they lose their entitlement to income support when their youngest child reaches 16. The Tories want lone parents to work part-time when their youngest child goes to primary school and to go full-time when the child transfers to secondary school.
Mr Cameron will accuse Labour of abandoning people on incapacity benefit, some one million of whom are said to want to work. Mental illnesses such as depression have replaced industrial injuries as the main reason for new claims. The number of under 25s claiming has risen by more than 50 per cent, and 6,600 people aged 16 and 17 receive the benefit.
The Tories say the new "fit for work" test will be funded by scrapping unsuccessful employment programmes and that payment by results for welfare-to-work providers would save money that could be spent on ending a bias against couples in the tax credit system.
Chris Grayling, the shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, said: "It's time to take tough action against those who are deliberately staying at home and claiming benefits rather than going back into work. We think that if you get a reasonable job offer, you should take it and if you don't, then you can't expect to be able to carry on claiming out-of-work benefits."
He added: "Under Gordon Brown we have seen millions of people coming into the country to work. Yet it's still possible for many British people to stay at home on benefits, and not go back to work. That simply doesn't make sense."
Peter Hain, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, said: "Our approach is based on social justice and full employment, and our policies are firm, fair, funded and deliverable. The Tories' policies are deeply reactionary, unfair, unfunded and undeliverable. They are basically saying that everyone on benefits is a scrounger and will be frogmarched into a job or will have their benefits cut off."
- 1 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 4 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Prove you gave away Chechen money, charities tell Hilary Swank
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 4 Khader Adnan: The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 'My 10 days at an Eton summer school was a real shock to the system'
- 7 WikiLeaks takes aim at an unlikely new victim: Unesco
- 8 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 9 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 10 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Wilderness and wildlife in Australia’s Top End
48 Hours: Marrakech
Bear with Bern for Swiss skiing
The West Bank's Bobby Sands
Is there such a thing as a gastronomic gender divide?




Comments