Clarke: Labour must focus on future
Friday 01 February 2008
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
HIV orphans in Thailand prepare for the future
In Baan Gerda, a community for HIV infected or affected youngsters in Northern Thailand, a group of ...
Online House Hunter: England’s most romantic places
Our Online House Hunter goes in search of romance this Valentine's Day...
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Labour could be out of power for more than a decade if the party "gets it wrong" in the run-up to the general election, Charles Clarke, the former home secretary, has warned.
Mr Clarke, MP for Norwich South, said Labour had "wasted much of the first half of this parliament" on internal party squabbles and remained "very unclear" about what it had to offer voters at the next election. Predicting an election in May 2010, he insisted defeat at the hands of David Cameron's Conservatives was not inevitable, but said Gordon Brown should not delay in showing a clear sense of purpose and direction on issues such as the environment, public sector reform and Europe.
"We must all understand that rhetoric about past Conservative failures and past Labour success will not disguise a failure to face the future," he said. "It seems to me that Labour still remains very unclear about our approach, both in this parliament and the next," Mr Clarke said in an article for Progress magazine.
"Now, above all, we need clarity in each policy area. The current uncertainties are widespread and give ammunition to our opponents." He said the "uncertainty'" surrounding the comparative merits of the diploma, A-level or the international baccalaureate at 18, was "potentially debilitating".
Mr Clarke, who has been tipped for a return to front-line politics, said on BBC radio that the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, was wrong to bow to pressure to reject the police arbitration award of 2.5 per cent, and reduce their pay rise to 1.9 per cent. "The fact that there was different treatment for the police and the teachers was a misjudgement," he said.
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 5 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all




Comments