UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 11° London Hi 13°C / Lo 7°C

Darling hits out at 'Kamikaze' bankers

PA

Chancellor Alistair Darling hit out at "kamikaze" bankers for damaging the British economy today and said a shake-up to be unveiled next week would prevent a repeat.

He has already indicated that next week's banking reform White Paper will include new powers for the Bank of England and Financial Services Authority.

Writing in the News of the World he said regulators would be able to ask "searching questions" and be "ready and able to deal with failures when they arise".

He said: "We need to learn lessons from the financial crisis in which banks behaved in a kamikaze manner and the regulatory system failed.

"Far too many people in boardrooms did not know, nor understand what was happening in their institutions.

"We know now that no authority in the world understood the true risks to the system or the likely consequences. That needs to change.

"I want a new banking system we can all rely on and which will be the foundation of our new prosperity."

The proposed reforms would "deliver tougher regulation and more rigorous monitoring and managing of system-wide risks so we can make sure we are ready and able to deal with failures when they arise," he said.

"Regulators will get powers to do their jobs more effectively, to ask searching questions of the institutions.

"Businesses need to be able to borrow. Families need to get mortgages. The stakes are high but a stable financial world is a goal we are determined to achieve."

Mr Darling yesterday played down reports of a turf war between Bank of England governor Mervyn King and the FSA, led by Lord Turner, over who will wield powers to regulate the banks.

He indicated that the White Paper will retain the "tripartite" regulatory system, which divides responsibility between the Bank, FSA and Treasury.

The Bank is expected to be given a central role in preventing future booms from turning into bubbles and assessing risks to the system, as well as to individual banks.

And the FSA will be told to take a more pro-active approach to preventing bonuses that reward short-term profits. Banks are expected to be required to hold more capital reserves to provide a safety net.

Mr Darling is thought likely to reject Mr King's call for banks to be split between their risky investment sides and their safer retail operations. But they are expected to be required to make it easier to see the split between the two functions, to make future rescues easier.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

News of the world?
[info]badalandabad wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC)
Does he actually write for that scum of a paper? What next? Ed Balls having his own column for Daily Star? And Harriet Harman, the agony aunt in The Sun?
I want a go
[info]berewic wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
Can I av a go at bein chanzler. I can rit gud and no sum sumz.
DYING THROWS OF A DISCREDITED GOVERNMENT.
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 01:28 pm (UTC)
Who would believe the PM or Darling? They are two weak individuals. The former Chancellor has his fingerprints all over the crime scene of this financial crisis. He did not reduce the Government deficit in the good times when money could have been rolling in. Now he and Darling are divided as ever and neither can produce a cohesive plan to salvage the economy. They can't blame the bankers for everything. Brown removed the regulatory powers from the Bank of England and left the Governor unable to effectively monitor bank dealings in financial instruments. It is worth noting that the failed bank's executives and Chairmen were mostly friends of Brown....coincidence or what?>?
Tri Partate Deal
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 07:43 pm (UTC)
Another way of saying this cold be: "More ways to spread the blame next time".

What needs to be shown to the public first is that the money used to prop up the banks is a loan, and not a gift. They will get the money back, eventually, unless they go totally tits up.

The financial trade for business and mortgages within the UK is deliberately being held back so the financial institutions can buy up future investments at a fraction of their real worth.

We have seen the speculators drive the price of oil through the roof, holding dozens of tankers off the UK coast and refusing to unload them until the oil peaks in price. The same has happened with the banks. Many individuals drove the price of the stock down to such a degree they were able to snap up a "future gold mine" for a pittance of the cost. Stock values will go up again and the money men will make a killing again.

Are we really expected to believe that "Far too many people in boardrooms did not know, nor understand what was happening in their institutions", utter rubbish. They knew, and were complicit in the actions, knowing that the Government would bail them out as there has never been a bank forclosure in modern history, and this Government were doing so badly they would jump at the chance to be seen to be doing something right!

The top men will still get massive wages and benefits, the Politicians will still sit on the boards of these financial institutions, ex MPS will more than likely be given full time Board positions, but we the public will still be as bloody poor now as we were then.

I would not expect any real reforms from these money loving nonces called the Government.



Not a conspiracy theory.

EDITOR'S CHOICE

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date