Education reforms 'may conflict with human rights legislation'
Monday 06 February 2006
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Tony Blair faced a fresh rebuke over his education reforms after an influential committee of MPs and peers warned they could conflict with human rights legislation.
Members of the joint parliamentary committee on human rights said the creation of independent state trust schools could affect children's fundamental right to an education.
A report from the committee, published yesterday, warned that creating independent institutions outside the normal framework of maintained state schools could "undermine" the ability of local authorities to fulfil their legal duty to provide a school place for all children.
The report also stated that proposals to give trust schools powers to vary the curriculum could interfere with rights against indoctrination, while reforms preventing local authorities from forcing trust schools to give places to individual children could also breach the human rights act.
The report warned that trust schools would be regulated by contracts with the education department, leaving parents and children with limited rights to challenge them in the courts.
The report comes as senior cabinet ministers moved yesterday to quell a potentially devastating rebellion in Labour ranks over the forthcoming Education Bill.
On Friday, the former transport secretary Stephen Byers warned that Mr Blair's position would be "untenable" if he could not secure Labour backing for the plans.
The Prime Minister's position was the subject of speculation yesterday, amid claims that Mr Blair would relinquish the premiership in favour of Gordon Brown next summer.
Newspaper reports claimed that Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, had advised Mr Blair to fix a date for his departure from Downing Street.
But Downing Street repeated its assertion that there was no deal between Mr Blair and Mr Brown, and senior government figures insisted there had been no formal pact between the men.
A source said: "The truth is I don't think Tony knows. There has been no discussion and certainly no agreement or understanding."
Alistair Darling, the Transport Secretary, told the BBC's Politics Show: "There's no deal, no special agreement. Tony Blair has made it quite clear that he intends to go during this Parliament. In the meantime, the two of them are working closely together and just last week, Gordon Brown made absolutely clear how important it is that, for example, we get our education reforms through because, you know, we shouldn't be in the business of trying to defend the status quo."
Baroness Estelle Morris, a former education secretary and a leading critic of the White Paper proposals, told the BBC she wanted real dialogue with the Government over the reforms.
"This is about the future of our schools for our children and their parents and we have got to have negotiations about substance, so great for the mood music, but let's bring on substance.
Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, said: "Ruth Kelly has been listening very carefully to backbench colleagues who she knows are looking for clarification and reassurance. I believe that the vast majority will receive that."
Mr Darling also moved to reassure critics. "Of course colleagues will want to be assured that we don't have a situation where we'd have children written off, but I think that when people actually see the Bill, when they see what the Government is proposing, they will see that, overall, what we are doing is improving standards, giving children a far better opportunity than they ever had in the past."
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments