Evidence in honours inquiry 'not revealed' 'hidden' in probe
Thursday 15 November 2007
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
The "most significant" evidence discovered by police during the cash-for-honours inquiry has not been revealed to the public, according to an official report by one of the senior investigators in the case.
The mysterious claim, which emerged last night, comes days after police disclosed that they had spent £1.4m of public money over a period of 19 months on the inquiry, which resulted in no charges being brought.
Assistant Commissioner John Yates has come in for criticism from Labour MPs for spending so long pursuing politicians over whether or not money was leant to political parties in exchange for peerages.
But the report, leaked to the Press Association last night after it was delivered to the Metropolitan Police Authority, defends the investigation as "focused and proportionate", and discloses that police requested a "forensic image" of Downing Street's computer system.
In November last year, Mr Yates fuelled speculation that he was in possession of critical evidence when he told Tony Wright, the Chairman of the Public Administration Select Committee, that "significant and valuable material" had been obtained. The new claim is likely to fuel speculation that such material remains outside the public domain.
The report also criticises the Electoral Commission for failing to provide "robust oversight" over the definition of a commercial loan.
A Met spokeswoman last night confirmed that the report had been delivered but declined to add any other comment.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments