Hain breaks ranks to warn Brown he is running out of time
Labour has lost its way under PM, says former loyalist. And it must act quickly to get voters' pulses racing again if it is to win next time
Labour discontent with Gordon Brown's leadership bursts into the open today as the former cabinet loyalist Peter Hain breaks ranks to warn that the party is heading towards defeat unless it changes course and rediscovers its core values.
Mr Hain, who has remained studiously loyal since exiting the Cabinet last year, writing exclusively for The Independent on Sunday, says the Government under Mr Brown lacks "narrative" and has lost its way after three election victories under Tony Blair. The intervention echoes simmering tensions among ministers as polls show Labour continues to suffer from the Government's handling of the recession. It will be seen as a thinly veiled attack on Mr Brown and raise renewed questions over his leadership. The move, along with an interview by Mr Hain in another newspaper, was being interpreted as the first shot in a fresh leadership crisis for the PM. In a further development, it emerged that Mr Brown has ordered his colleagues to stop any leaks, following a series of damaging revelations of cabinet disagreements. He took the unusual step of issuing the warning amid signs of a concerted briefing campaign against Harriet Harman. Mr Brown's attempt to reassert his authority underlines the deterioration in cabinet unity as he struggles to hold his Government together during the biggest economic and political crisis since Labour came to power. It also lays bare his fears that the widening splits in his Cabinet threaten his chances of emerging from the crisis with any prospect of winning the next general election. In his article, Mr Hain, who resigned as Secretary of State for Work and Pensions last year over the Labour donations affair, says Mr Brown "can" win the next election, but only if he imposes radical change and a clear vision of where the party is heading. "To win, Labour must be seen as the credible force for change, and that means changing itself – and there is not much time left," he writes. "There is no escaping that New Labour has lost five million voters – and not simply because of longevity in power. On basic core-vote issues of affordable housing, job security, employment rights, crime and migration, Labour has to do much better and much more." He adds: "Despite all Gordon Brown's best efforts and his excellent speech to the US Congress this week, Labour has not had a clear enough narrative right across government." Mr Hain says that whatever the "individual policy merits" of ID cards, Trident, nuclear power, part-privatisation of the Royal Mail and Heathrow's third runway, they "do not add up to a programme to get the pulse of potential voters racing. Where is the story in all that, where is the distinctive Labour narrative, where are the Labour values of social justice and freedom?" Mr Brown opened a cabinet "away day" in Southampton with a remarkable lecture about the dangers of allowing the contents of private discussions to enter the public domain. He ended his 10-minute dressing-down with a stern reminder that the whole Government would suffer critical damage if cabinet confidentiality were not preserved. "He said we would all suffer if any more details leaked out," one cabinet minister revealed last night. Mr Brown is believed to have been particularly angry about the revelation that Ms Harman, Labour's deputy leader, had been "slapped down" by colleagues, including Hazel Blears and John Hutton, when she suggested action to claw back bonuses already paid to failed bankers. A subsequent leak revealed a cabinet split over plans for a "moratorium" on any new laws – including moves to increase equality in the workplace – that could impose more costs on businesses. "This is a time for a bit less Bill Clinton and a bit more Margaret Thatcher," a Downing Street strategist said last night. "The country doesn't want empathy, it wants to be led." But details of Mr Brown's appeal to his colleagues emerged amid further signs of conflict over the succession if he is forced out. Ministers last night identified the Secretary of State for Children, Ed Balls – a close Brown ally – as the most likely opponent of a Harman leadership bid. Mr Balls's admission that Labour had not been tough enough when regulating the banking sector in the years before the credit crisis was described as "pure positioning" by his rivals. Mr Balls also gave a speech at a fundraising dinner for Ms Harman's deputy, Chris Bryant, last Wednesday. He joked that Mr Bryant "has done a good job, I wouldn't say controlling our Leader of the Commons [Ms Harman], but supporting her". It has also emerged that Ms Harman, while Mr Brown was in the US, referred to herself as "duty prime minister". In a speech to Labour's Scottish conference in Dundee yesterday, she heaped praise on Mr Brown. Ed Miliband, who is also seen as a possible leadership contender, told the conference that the party faced "testing times" and that the country needed "an economic vision, an environmental vision and a social vision". Hain in the spotlight: Colourful campaigner who made headlines * Born in Kenya in 1950, but brought up in South Africa. * Arrived in the UK in the mid 1960s. studied at the University of London and Sussex University. * Joined the Young Liberals, becoming chairman in 1971. * Charged in 1974 with robbing a branch of Barclays Bank. Acquitted at trial. * Helped to found the Anti-Nazi League, to campaign against the National Front and other far-right groups, in 1977. Joined the Labour Party in the same year. * Elected MP for Neath at a by-election in 1991. * Appointed junior minister at the Wales Office in 1997. Later served at the Foreign Office, before joining the Cabinet as Secretary of State for Wales in 2002, and later as Leader of the Commons, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and Work and Pensions. * Forced to resign from the Cabinet in January 2008 over the late declaration of deputy leadership campaign donations.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
I come from plant Earth and we also have a political party called NuLabour. On my planet they have done such a bad job of running the country. Everything our NuLabour have done in the last twelve years has cost ten times it's original "quote" and still didn't work. The billions of tax payers money they have thrown away to foreign countries is astronomical. They have invited millions of foreign citizens to our shores and give them shed loads of cash, even though they have contributed nothing to our economy or country. This is strange becouse millions of people that have not only contributed financially all their lives but also fought in wars to protect our land, are being starved by NuLabour. Who claim they are short of cash, although the cash they have for failed banks run by criminal fraudsters seems limitless.
Where I come from our NuLabour lie, cheat and steal from us on every occasion they are given the opportunity. Our NuLabour, rather than teach kids in decent schools run by decent teachers, they fix the exams and dumb-down in order to con us into believing their ideas are a success.
On my planet NuLabour have failed in everything they do or have done in the past twelve years. On my planet NuLabour have no chance of winning the next general election but every chance of spending years and years in a prison cell.
http://news.independentminds.livejourna
...... more planet-busting top-down promotion of gluttonous consumerism ...
Perhaps he imagines himself as the next Labour leader...
A shabby failure, utterly hated by the British people.
Custard sales are booming - we're waiting for you, Fatso.
After nearly 12 years of dysfunctional Government, the electorate are angry and unhappy with these champagne socialists. They have lived well on the best perks in the land whilst we have had our pensions ruined, savings ruined, jobs ruined, businesses ruined, life style ruined, retirement ruined.
They have massively abused their Parliamentary powers, become arrogant, greedy and rotten. Whilst preaching to the electorate, they busy themselves grabbing as many perks as possible. The writing is now on the wall and none of them can stop their kamakazi spiral into the wilderness. Brown has put the Labour movement out of business for the next 50 years. The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money.
Then the Cabinet had a wonderful "narrative" about the banks, the City, the illegal Irak war and the WMD's. All of a sudden this "narrative" is no more likeable. Funny enough.
1. "can we compete" : North Korea, France, Pakistan, and Iran can (in the area of high tech education / industrial_development of defence systems that I mentioned. Similar considerations apply to other possibilities;
2. why has it not been done during" the past ten years" : for the same reason that Britain was de-educated and de-skilled during the two previous decades;
3. "there aren't any" : agreed. Britain was so thoroughly bananarepublicanised during the three decades of subversive Blatcherist government, that the very serious situation that now obtains is not unlike an actual banana republic that suddenly finds itself unable to produce a crop or an alternative crop either because of seriously dysfunctional government, that instead of investing in high tech education and industrial developments (driven to begin with by developing for example a home grown 100 billion 'Trident' and investing massively in education education education, doles out zillions in direct corporate welfare and corporate welfare wars.
Because of the urgency, I have suggested as an alternative to the long slog towards implosion of the pseudo-democracy, a Cromwellian clean sweep of all snouts, both subversives and others, out of Westminster and Whitehall
However, it will not make a scrap of difference which party wins the next election, since all major parties belong to the same 'more globalisatipn, more corporate control, more wars, more transfer of wealth from poor to rich, one wolrd government' club.
Fell down laffing when Indi Ms. Orr likened something or other to "having Harriet Harman to tea"
Anyone who understands economics wouldn't have claimed to have "abolished boom and bust", would they?
Golem Brown ought to remember the words of another un-elected Labour prime minister James Callaghan who told his colleagues: "We used to think that you could just spend your way out of recession...I have to tell you in all candour, that that option no longer exists".
Racing facts has to be a whole lot better than printing money.
No, you'll GET who you VOTE for. No-one voted for Brown and he never stood for office - this half-wit fell into the position when Tony Blair went.
No-one will vote for Hopeless Hattie.
Mr Balls's admission that Labour had not been tough enough when regulating the banking sector: Was seen as the truth by the voters
"Despite all Gordon Brown's best efforts and his excellent speech to the US Congress this week":we are still bankrupt
Blind leading the Blind
and they knew it. when one is flattered by someone always ask what do they really want?
"Mr Hain says that whatever the "individual policy merits" of ID cards, Trident, nuclear power, part-privatisation of the Royal Mail and Heathrow's third runway.."
MERITS? MERITS?!?!?! These are some of the most unpopular things they've brought in! ID Cards (and the National Identity Register, which is far worse) drove me away from Labour in the first place.
And these guys wonder why we're resorting to chucking custard at the likes of Mandelson to try and get them to listen.
Talk about alienation... Do 'they' ever actually bother to speak to the general public these days?
I realise you're very busy working hard for the destruction of my country and it's people. But I would just like to point out, that if you employ odious little shytes like the terrorist sympathiser Hain, then you should expect to get stabbed in the back. Oh, and no more Labour party. Ever!
Expect more like him soon.
Beware the Ides of March
Regards,
S o A
There have only been two Labour leaders since 1950 who have actually won a general election - Wilson and Blair. The Brown government is only there at all because of Blair's 2005 victory.
If, therefore, Labour are remotely serious about winning the next general election, what would be wrong with actually reverting to Blair's policies instead of recklessly careering along their present erratic path like a runaway train?
The ruling classes may slow the process down a bit, in fact they'll do everything in their power to keep things the way they have been, but nothing is going to stop the collapse of this consumer/capitalist society.
In fact, the harder the ruling classes struggle to maintain this particular social structure, the faster it will disintegrate.
To be frank it might be no bad thing, in the long run, for this country to have total social collapse.
Short term of course it will be very unpleasant but it really would be a splendid opportunity to get rid of this horribly corrupt pseudo-democracy we now suffer from.
Our society has stagnated dreadfully &, like all stagnant pools, the scum has floated to the top.
The question being, if we get the chance to rebuild our society from the ground floor up, will we have learnt anything from the mistakes we've made?
One thing strikes me more than any other.
A society that's sole objective is the aquisition of material wealth cannot help but breed corruption.
I could go on but all of the above are from "the racist BNP" so we should not give them an ear
joolz
We should install an interim all party National Government.
We have to change our corrupt First Past The Post voting system.
We have to start building an economy from scratch.
We have to do it sometime, why wait until it's too late!
Please if you have a moment have a look at this
http://www.gopetition.co.uk/online/2564
The sooner Brown calls an election, and allows the healing to begin, the better. Unlikely to happen as he's more interested in keeping his job than what's good for the country
how about for june next year, he will TRY and stay in POWER as long as he can, he his the saviour of the world, and needs the time to feather his nest, job prospect and golden pension.
In 6 months all the illegal immigrants will be given an amnesty, a british passport and a free membership to labour, 1/2 million votes for zanulabour
joolz
Our Right to Public Consultation in Welsh Higher Education
Peter Hain said
A fourth-term Labour government needs to be active and enabling, rather than centralising and controlling. It needs to empower individual citizens and local communities to take control of the decisions that affect their own lives through a much more radical approach to devolution of power and budgets.
Question
Does that include issues of tuition fees and higher education
Irrespective of peoples opinions, the fact is without public consultation and accountability they count for nothing. The only way you have to express your opinions on higher education is via a blog.
Childrens Minister Ed Balls on the 1st of December 2008 said
where things go badly wrong, people are right to want to know why and what will be done about it.
Surely the same standards apply in Wales
So why did things at the University of Wales Lampeter go so badly wrong that they needed life support via an emergency fund and what is being done about it. Who is being held to account for the failure or to put it a better way, how much were they paid
The response to one disaster is to create another by merging with nearby Trinity College. The leader of the Merger Committee says that everyone will be consulted. He forgot to mention everyone except the public.
The former Adjudicator for Higher Education, which deals with student complaints, said that universities have no sense of natural justice. Its the old adage of power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Thats why we need public consultation and accountability, a political opposition and people who will speak out when the democratic process is abused.
Re: Peter Hain said
A fourth-term Labour government needs to be active and enabling, rather than centralising and controlling. It needs to empower individual citizens and local communities to take control of the decisions that affect their own lives through a much more radical approach to devolution of power and budgets.
The Conservatives in the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act took away powers from the Minister of Education and handed them over to unaccountable QUANGOs. The Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW) and its subsidiary the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA), both exclude any form of public: complaint, consultation or accountability.
The current New Labour government under the Public Audit (Wales) Act 2004 excluded any form of public complaint on financial matters and withdrew the power of the Auditor General for Wales to intervene on issue of value for money and maladministration. It also took away the power of the Auditor General under the Local Government Act 2000 to take over a higher education establishment on the grounds of financial mismanagement.
The result is that the Welsh Assembly now claims it has no jurisdiction and neither does the Public Service Ombudsman or Auditor General. This absurd situation has reached a point whereby academics are themselves worried about the way in which our Universities are governed. They admit that the only way to bring any form of maladministration to light is to publish it in a journal or newspaper; otherwise, you are wasting your time.
Complain to the Welsh Assembly and because of the above situation which prevents any form of public accountability they say they have no jurisdiction. Laws are made in Westminster and so you complain to the Department of Universities Innovation and Skills, they say it is a devolved issue, and refer it back to the Welsh Assembly, and so you go round in circles on a road to nowhere.
That then begs the question what are the opposition parties doing about this situation and the answer is nothing.
After nearly 12 years running our economy, his time has run out and so has patience with your incompetent Party. No wonder your membership numbers have collapsed and your support evaporated. He and his coterie of sleazy Ministers have proved to be an absolute nightmare and the electorate want a change. At the next election, you will experience the biggest vote against your hopeless Party in history. As a result of your Government's mismanagement of the economy, the Labour Party will be out of the running for the next 50 years.
now he has seen through Zanulabour and rightly puts hiS finger on the reality.Bit late, Peter, most of us would say