Graduate sues Government over 'slave labour' schemes
Forcing job seekers to work for no wages is an abuse of their human rights, the High Court is told in landmark legal case
The Government was forced to deny exploiting "slave labour" yesterday over its controversial "workfare" schemes which see job seekers working for no wages.
An unemployed graduate, who claims she was made to work in a shop for no pay other than her benefits, has asked the High Court to declare that her human rights were breached in a case which could have far-reaching implications for the Coalition's flagship back-to-work programme.
Lawyers for Cait Reilly, 23, said she was made to carry out tasks which "did not contribute to [her] search for work to any extent". Nathalie Lieven QC told Mr Justice Foskett that Ms Reilly was told to carry out basic tasks such as sweeping and shelf-stacking "without training, supervision or remuneration".
Speaking outside court, Ms Reilly said: "Forcing people to work for free does nothing to tackle the causes of long-term unemployment."
An unemployed 40-year-old is challenging the legality of another Government work scheme that pays no wages. Both cases seek the quashing of Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) regulations under which the schemes were set up and declarations that there have been violations of Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits forced labour and slavery.
The cases come weeks after it was revealed that job seekers on the DWP's workfare schemes were employed at the Queen's Diamond Jubilee Pageant without pay. The schemes, which the Government says are intended to provide vital work experience to job seekers, have attracted criticism because people are often asked to work for no wages beyond their benefits payments.
Opponents have expressed fears that job seekers are being exploited as cheap, disposable labour and some have claimed they were told falsely that signing up the schemes was mandatory for job seekers.
The DWP said: "We will be contesting these cases vigorously. These schemes are not slave labour. They play an important part in giving job seekers the skills and experience they need to find work. It is entirely reasonable to ask job seekers to take real steps towards finding work if they are claiming benefits."
Yesterday, anti-workfare activists in Liverpool began a campaign to disrupt the communications systems of A4e, a company heavily linked to the schemes.
Notes from a small island: Is Sealand an independent 'micronation' or an illegal fortress?
World news in pictures
You thought Ryanair's attendants had it bad? Wait 'til you hear about their pilots
Join Ryanair! See the world! But we'll only pay you for nine months a year
Revealed: Eerie new images show forgotten French apartment that was abandoned at the outbreak of World War II and left untouched for 70 years
- 1 Stoke City investigate 'religious abuse' after 'pig's head is found in Kenwyne Jones' locker'
- 2 Heading for America? Prepare for the longest US immigration queues ever
- 3 Amir Khan interview: 'One second could end my boxing career'
- 4 Groundhog day looms for Arsène Wenger as Arsenal battle for a place in the Champions League on final day
- 5 Join Ryanair! See the world! But we'll only pay you for nine months a year
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
£30000 - £40000 per annum + BENS: Progressive Recruitment: Drupal Developer A ...
£45000 - £50000 per annum + bens: Progressive Recruitment: C# WEB DEVELOPER Le...
£240 - £260 per day: Progressive Recruitment: WPF Developer (C#, VB.Net) North...
£85 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Cheshire: KS2 teacher needed to do PPA ...