Iraq inquiry to hear evidence in private
Monday 15 June 2009
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
‘French beer is unknown. We must change that’
Stereotypes die hard. ‘The Very Hungry Frenchman’, the BBC’s current television series following che...
Something for the weekend in London: February 17-19
To some, February is the month of lurrrve, to others it's the month of rain, snow and flu, but for u...
CC kills more people than cervical cancer; why haven’t we heard about it?
There is a disease whose incidence is rising in the UK and most of the industrialised world. However...
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
The Prime Minister today announced his inquiry into the Iraq war would be held in private - to the dismay of campaigners.
And its findings will not be published until next summer, after the date of the next General Election - an announcement met by jeers from Opposition MPs.
The Conservative leader David Cameron said there was a danger that by delaying the start of the inquiry and prolonging the term of its deliberations, people would think the inquiry had been "fixed" because it would not report until after the next general election.
Gordon Brown said the probe would be conducted by non-politicians, led by ex-Whitehall mandarin Sir John Chilcot.
It would cover the period from September 2001, in the run-up to war, until July this year when the last UK soldier will come home, Mr Brown told MPs in a Commons statement.
The Premier told MPs that, with the last UK combat mission over in Iraq, "now is the right time to ensure we have a proper process in place to learn the lessons".
He said the investigation would be an "independent privy councillor committee of inquiry" and stressed: "The inquiry will be fully independent of Government. The scope of the inquiry is unprecedented. It covers an eight-year period.
"The committee will have access to the fullest range of information, including secret information. Their investigation can range across all documents, all papers and all material. No British documents and no British witness will be beyond the scope of the inquiry."
Mr Brown said the inquiry was expected to report some time after July next year.
He said that although the inquiry would not take evidence in public, its report would be published with only the "the most sensitive information" held back.
"The primary objective of the committee will be to identify lessons learned. The committee will not set out to apportion blame or consider issues of civil or criminal liability."
Mr Cameron said he was "far from convinced the Prime Minister has got it right". He said: "The whole point of having an inquiry is that it has got to be able to make clear recommendations, go wherever the evidence needs, to establish the full truth and to make sure the right lessons are learned. And it has got to do so in a way which builds public confidence."
The membership of the inquiry "looks quite limited", the terms of reference are "restrictive", the investigation was not specifically charged with making recommendations and "none of it will be held in public".
By not reporting until after the next election, the public will conclude that it was "fixed to make sure the Government avoids having to face up to any inconvenient conclusions".
Mr Cameron set out a series of detailed concerns about the nature and scope of the inquiry.
He said: "This inquiry should have started earlier. How can anyone argue that an inquiry starting six months ago would somehow have undermined British troops?
"Indeed the argument that you can't have an inquiry while troops are still in Iraq has been blown away by the Prime Minister saying today that some troops will be staying there even as the inquiry gets under way."
He called for Mr Brown to look at the possibility of publishing an interim report early next year.
There "has to be a question" about the military experience of the inquiry panel and Mr Cameron called for senior politicians to be involved to consider the political judgments that were made.
He told Mr Brown: "The inquiry needs to be and needs to be seen to be truly independent and not just an establishment stitch-up."
The Conservative leader also questioned why the inquiry would not be allowed to single out people for blame.
"Shouldn't the inquiry have the ability to apportion blame? If mistakes were made, we need to know who made them and why they were made."
He also questioned whether the inquiry would be allowed access to US and Iraqi documents and witnesses.
Mr Cameron called for greater transparency, asking: "Shouldn't there be some proper public sessions?
"Isn't that what many will want and many will expect and part of the building of public confidence that is absolutely necessary?"
Mr Brown last week made a Commons statement about constitutional reform with greater accountability as a key plank of his strategy.
Mr Cameron said: "What happened to that, it hasn't even lasted a week?"
The Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said: "I am staggered that the Prime Minister is seeking to compound the error, fatal to so many of Britain's sons and daughters, by covering up the path that led to it."
Mr Brown said the country could be "supremely proud" of the work done by British troops in Iraq and insisted all the objectives of the mission had been or were being met.
"Thanks to our efforts and those of our allies, over six difficult years, a young democracy had replaced a vicious 30-year dictatorship."
The military mission ended on April 30 and as of today there were fewer than 500 British troops in Iraq, with more returning home each week.
A small number of British Navy personnel, no more than 100, will remain in Iraq for long term training at the Iraqi Government's request.
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 3 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 4 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 5 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Hey, You've got to hide your drug away
- 1 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 4 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 5 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 6 Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 8 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Can you master a language in a weekend?
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Dawn of the age of wireless medicine
Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
Is there such a thing as a gastronomic gender divide?
The day I danced for a place in Danny Boyle's Olympics spectacular




Comments