Jowell: public inquiry 'would be a diversion'
Saturday 08 July 2006
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
Why David Cameron owes unemployed single mothers an apology
How would you describe an unemployed single mother, with moderate depression, who can't afford new s...
Can we shop our way out of a recession?
The idea that a lot of shopping translates into a healthy economy is dubious. On the three prior oc...
How social networking made public vanity acceptable
When did it become acceptable to brag about oneself publicly?
‘French beer is unknown. We must change that’
Stereotypes die hard. ‘The Very Hungry Frenchman’, the BBC’s current television series following che...
Tessa Jowell, the Culture Secretary, has ruled out a public inquiry into the July 7 bombings, warning that it would be an expensive diversion for the police and security services.
Muslim groups and the families of some victims have demanded an investigation similar to the US commission that examined the background to the September 11 attacks. They argue that many questions about last year's bombings remain, including whether intelligence failings contributed to the attacks.
Ms Jowell said she recognised the "raw grief, frustration and anger" of many families, but insisted that an official inquiry could take "years and years" to answer their questions.
"If there was a genuine belief in government that a public inquiry would answer questions which have not yet been answered, then of course it would be held," she told BBC Breakfast. "The concern is that these families would not get the answers to the questions that they seek. There would be an enormous diversion of security resources which need to be directed to prevent this happening again. The costs would be enormous ... money spent on the inquiry that could be spent on better surveillance."
The Government has dug in its heels against an inquiry for months. Last week Tony Blair said that it would divert "resources, energy and commitment from the police and the security services".
John Reid, the Home Secretary, has even argued that it would put lives at risk because of the amount of police and security service time it would consume.
The Home Office has published a narrative of the events and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee has also examined the background to the bombings.
But critics say no one has scrutinised allegations that one or two of the bombers came to the attention of the security services who then eliminated them from their inquiries.
Nor has there been an official investigation into whether the men acted on their own, whether they had links to al-Qa'ida, and how they became radicalised.
The Liberal Democrats have protested that the two reports were "limited in scope" and are backing a public inquiry.
David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, has called for an inquiry similar to the Franks Committee, which examined the causes of the Falklands War. He has accepted that some hearings would have to be held in private, but stressed that it should be conducted by a senior independent public figure.
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 3 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 4 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 5 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Hey, You've got to hide your drug away
- 1 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 4 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 5 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 6 Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 8 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Can you master a language in a weekend?
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Wilderness and wildlife in Australia’s Top End
48 Hours: Marrakech
Bear with Bern for Swiss skiing
The West Bank's Bobby Sands
A very good cuppa: Restaurants embrace afternoon tea tradition




Comments