Kelly wants to 'root out' Nimbys - now, though, it turns out she is one
Thursday 11 May 2006
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
HIV orphans in Thailand prepare for the future
In Baan Gerda, a community for HIV infected or affected youngsters in Northern Thailand, a group of ...
Online House Hunter: England’s most romantic places
Our Online House Hunter goes in search of romance this Valentine's Day...
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Ruth Kelly faced fresh embarrassment as she was branded a hypocrite for denouncing Nimbyism while opposing a series of housing developments in her constituency.
Local planners said Ms Kelly, the new Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, was a regular campaigner against new housing in her Bolton West constituency, despite saying she wanted to "root out" the not-in-my-backyard attitude of householders.
She had campaigned against at least nine housing developments in Bolton. Last week she backed a campaign to block plans by a housing association for eight two and three-bedroom houses in the Deane area of Bolton.
The criticism came a day after Ms Kelly was attacked by gay rights campaigners after refusing to say whether she believed homosexuality was a sin. On Tuesday Ms Kelly said she wanted to end the culture of householders being "protective of their own space" and objecting to social housing. She said she wanted to change "the social culture in this country where too often the case has been that people have been protective of their own space and not wanted to see more affordable housing being built. That is something we need to root out."
Other plans attacked by Ms Kelly included proposals for 65 houses on a former hospital site, and plans for 30, one- and two-bedroom flats in Heaton.
She also sided with residents opposing a plan to build 600 homes in Westhoughton, in 2000, telling her local paper: "Clearly the developers have seen the strength of opposition against their plans."
Ms Kelly praised the failure of a 1999 scheme for a separate 1,100-home estate nearby, saying it was "a victory for people power". She said: "We must savour this sweet victory over developers." Ms Kelly also spoke out against plans to sell off land at a railway station in 1998.
Yesterday the chairman of Bolton Metropolitan Council's planning committee, Margaret Rothwell, said she laughed when she heard Ms Kelly herald her crackdown on Nimbys.
She said: "It is not just big housing developments, it could also be something quite small. You get a number of objections to it, and they write to Ruth Kelly. She has always sided with the objectors. You could hear me guffaw. There are posh bits of Bolton West that will protect their own space."
Alan Rushton, leader of Bolton Council's Tory group, said: "Her behaviour is a bit rich. She was representing her electorate's views but she will have to change that point of view now. I would like to see her reaction to a similar proposal now.
"If she makes the case and says, 'I got it all wrong, I want housing everywhere now', I think she would face a few fireworks in Bolton."
Caroline Spelman, the shadow Communities Secretary, said: "This is breathtaking hypocrisy from a minister who has repeatedly opposed development in her own constituency yet is happy to steamroller people's objections elsewhere."
Andrew Stunell, the Liberal Democrat Communities spokesman, said: "Ruth Kelly must learn that grand gestures won't solve the problem of hundreds of thousands of people with nowhere to live, and a generation priced out of the property ladder."
A spokeswoman for Ms Kelly said: "Ruth Kelly said it was a personal priority for her to provide more affordable homes and to change the attitudes of people who were opposed to new houses being built.
"But this doesn't mean accepting every development which is put forward. New developments need to be high quality and well designed with good infrastructure and public spaces.
"It is perfectly legitimate for an MP to reflect constituents' concerns when they do not feel new housing fits these criteria."
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 5 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all




Comments