UK

11° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Labour fends off fresh rebellion over 10p tax

By Andrew Grice

The Government avoided a humiliating defeat last night over Gordon Brown's controversial decision to abolish the 10p starting rate of income tax.

Ministers beat off a Labour backbench attempt to compensate all the losers from the move, which was included in Mr Brown's last Budget as Chancellor in 2007.

Labour whips were so worried about the prospect of an embarrassing defeat for Mr Brown that ministers were ordered to cancel foreign trips so they could vote. A rebel amendment to the Finance Bill, which implements this year's Budget, was defeated by 311 votes to 268, with the Government's majority of 63 cut to 43.

The revolt was led by Frank Field, the former Welfare Reform minister, and Greg Pope, a former Labour whip.

Although 30 Labour MPs signed their amendment – potentially enough to defeat the Government – only 15, including Frank Field who tabled the amendment, voted for it after ministers claimed that it would cause "chaos" by preventing the collection of taxes.

Other critics of the 10p tax decision said privately that they did not want to weaken Mr Brown after recent Commons defeats over pension rights for Gurkhas and MPs' expenses. Mr Field warned the Government that it was playing for "very, very high stakes" and that it had to offer more than just "warm words".

He told the Commons that half a million of the country's poorest households were still losing out by about £2-£3 a week, adding: "The golden thread that knits us all together [in Labour] is that we came into this place not only to protect but to advance the interests of those who get the least from life.

"The 10p is a denial of all that we have come into public life about, and this is our last chance before the general election to rectify it."

Stephen Timms, the Treasury minister, offered to hold talks with the Labour rebels to see whether more help could be given to the losers but declined to make specific proposals. He insisted the Government had fully compensated 90 per cent of the five million people who originally lost out.

He said that the amendment would leave the Government unable to collect income tax this year and that it would have to repay that which it had already collected. "The chaos doesn't bear thinking about," he said. "Blocking income tax isn't the answer."

Mr Timms said that the average loss to those households who were still worse off was less than £1 a week.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Labour Rebels - All Talk, No action
[info]tonyexeter wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 06:11 am (UTC)
So after all this bold talk from labour rebels they fall into line behind Gordon Brown. Pathetic.
Labour's Betrayal of the Poor
[info]terryphi wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 06:12 am (UTC)
Well done, Frank Field, for continuing to highlight this betrayal of the poor by the Labour Government.

Who were the 15 spineless Labour MPs who signed the amendment but then failed to vote for it? We need to know.

When are we going to get a promise from David Cameron to rectify the injustice if the Conservatives win the next election?
Labour fends off fresh rebellion over 10p tax
[info]robspierre wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
I don't know why anybody bothers reporting about Labour Rebels and the 10p tax rate. It just goes to show that most of them but with a few exceptions are just gutless. How can they be swayed by anything that Gordon Brown promises them, we all know that he will say just about anything just to get his own way. They should really have stuck it to Gordon Brown and made him compensate the people who lost out in the rate abolition properly NOW, believe me nothing will come of his promises because nothing is going to happen before the election and then hopefully it won't be his problem anymore.
Brown wins but ...
[info]deimosp wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
Victory for Brown, defeat for those on low incomes.

Once again, despite having plenty of opportunity, Labour has again shown how they have deserted those on low incomes.

I think there are far more losers on this 10p band than Brown admits to. I have not got anything back under Brown's complex "alternatives" and actually know nobody who has. For those of us on lower incomes life is not as easy as for those on e.g. PM/Ministerial salaries.
Another 10000 votes for the BNP
[info]paulvw wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 08:15 am (UTC)
By this disgusting action Labour yet again proves it is no longer the party of the working classes but a party of fraudalent liars. With the lack of a credible socialist party in this country the far right will continue to gain strength and support from the disenfranchised amongst the lower paid and unemployed in our society. Who can condemn someone who votes for the only party that admits they exist? The biggest traitors of all however are the Union bosses that continue to finance a party thet screws their membership again and again. Although Frank Field is to be applauded for his attempt he and the other supposed left wing MPs would have more credibilty if they had left the labour party once it became the property of big bussiness and the USA.
NOT "the right thing to do"
[info]2barrows wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 08:33 am (UTC)

After MPs' expenses, Goodwin's £700,000 pension, and Hester's £9.2m pay package do these cretins really believe that continuing to take £50 a year away from the poorest to fund a tax reduction for the better off is a price worth paying to protect Gordon Brown from the nemesis of his gross error of judgement in 2007? No collective sense, no morality, no principles.
The poor get yet poorer
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 09:10 am (UTC)
How disgusting that Brown says people are no worse due to increases in child benefit and working families tax credits.

He knows very well, the single young workers, on the minimum wage, have been thrown from the 10p straight into the 20p tax band, and these young people cannot be apply for working tax credits. The new measures to help these young kids have not equated to their loss.

How about Brown stops Child Benefit for the rich?

No he wont do that, the money is vital for the rich kids pocket money!

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date