Budget 2009
Labour makes tax the election battleground
PM tears up New Labour script with 50p tax rate for highest earners
Alistair Darling yesterday drew the battle lines for a general election in a year's time by announcing a tax increase for the rich to help fund a record £700bn rise in public borrowing over the next five years.
In what was called a "going for broke" Budget, the Chancellor breached New Labour's election manifesto pledges since 1997 not to raise the 40p top rate of income tax. A new 50p rate will apply on earnings above £150,000 a year from next April – a year earlier than the abandoned 45p rate announced last November. The same group of high earners will also see the 40 per cent tax relief on their pension contributions pared back. Personal tax allowances for people earning more than £100,000 a year will be abolished.
Mr Darling told the Commons that borrowing would rise to an unprecedented £175bn in the current financial year because of a worse than expected global recession. It is the highest level of borrowing since the Second World War and a huge increase on the £38bn he forecast a year ago and the £118bn he predicted in November. It will be £173bn next year, he added.
But experts predicted the actual figures would be even worse, accusing him of being wildly over-optimistic in predicting a rapid bounce back to 3.5 per cent growth from 2011. Only minutes after the Chancellor finished speaking, the International Monetary Fund contradicted his forecasts. It said the British economy would contract by 0.4 per cent next year, challenging his prediction of 1.25 per cent growth.
Mr Darling rejected pressure from some cabinet colleagues and Labour MPs for an even tougher squeeze on the rich. They wanted a 50p top rate on incomes of £100,000 a year. In his discussions with Gordon Brown on the Budget, the Chancellor insisted on spelling out clearly how the nation's books would be balanced to try to reassure the financial markets. The rebalancing will not be achieved under his plans until 2015-16, two years later than planned in November.
City analysts warned that the tax rise for top earners could provoke a 1970s-style "brain drain" from Britain. But cabinet ministers denied the "soak the rich" strategy marked the end of New Labour, even though Tony Blair blocked Mr Brown's plans for a 50p top rate ahead of the 1997 election.
Lord Mandelson, who in 1998 said New Labour was "intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich as long as they pay their taxes", said last night: "This a serious economic shock and we have to respond to it in a tough, responsible and fair way." Pointing out that President Barack Obama was raising taxes on the rich, the Business Secretary asked: "Does Britain really want to be the odd one out?" He added: "Fairness is not only popular – it is right."
Labour sources insisted the tax hike would affect "the few, not the many". Only 1 per cent of taxpayers would be hit by the 50p rate and 2 per cent by the squeeze on those earning above £100,000. From next April, someone earning between £150,000 and £200,000 annually will be £80 a week or £4,000 a year worse off. Someone earning between £100,000 and £150,000 a year will be £40 a week or £2,000 a year worse off. For those earning more than £150,000, the 40 per cent tax relief on pension contributions will be gradually withdrawn, falling to the 20 per cent basic rate when they earn £180,000. The Treasury said a quarter of tax relief on pensions currently goes to people on more than £150,000.
The Tories will hope to turn the tables on Labour by pledging at the election to "protect the many, not the few". They will not reverse the tax increases affecting people earning more than £100,000, fearing that Labour would brand them "the party of the rich".
But if they win power, they will seek bigger spending cuts to head off the 0.5 per cent rise in national insurance payments due in 2011, which will affect workers paid more than £20,000 a year. Mr Darling, who announced the move last November, remained silent about it yesterday.
"These are tax rises for the many, not the few," a senior Tory source said. "We will make sure the election battleground is all about these national insurance rises." Calling it a "dishonest Budget", the Tories said Mr Darling's growth assumptions were "fantasy forecasts". They said debt repayments would equal the £43bn education budget, while national debt would double to £1.4 trillion.
Treasury officials said only one-third of the rebalancing to repay the extra borrowing would come from higher tax, with the rest coming from a big squeeze on public spending. It will grow by only 0.7 per cent in real terms from 2011, instead of 1.2 per cent. But the Government refused to disclose yesterday where the axe would fall.
Kickstarting a year-long election run-in, Lord Mandelson challenged the Tories to say how they would cut spending deeper to avert the national insurance rises. "The Tories' real plan is for big cuts today and even bigger cuts later," he claimed. "They are playing hide-and-seek with the public. They don't support our invest-and-growth strategy but won't say how they would reduce spending. Not declaring their hand on anything is not going to win them the election."
Mr Darling, who added 2p on a litre of fuel, 1p on a pint of beer and 7p on a pack of 20 cigarettes, used what little money he had at his disposal to announce a £3.1bn plan which he hopes will help the unemployed back into work. He also announced a scrappage scheme under which people with cars at least 10 years old will qualify for a £2,000 discount in a new vehicle from mid-May.
Despite presenting an "austerity Budget", the Chancellor argued that his package was preparing Britain for the recovery and announced plans to boost the industries of the future, such as wind power and "clean coal". In a sideswipe at the Tory Opposition, he said: "You can grow your way out of recession. You cannot cut your way out."
But David Cameron said Mr Darling had written himself into the history books with "a whole chapter in red ink" and landed Britain with a "decade of debt". The Tory leader said the Government was "running out of money, moral authority and time". "As of today, any claim they have ever made to economic competence is dead, over, finished."
Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, said Labour had "condemned us to years of unemployment and decades of debt" and had been "desperately rushing around picking up half-baked ideas to save the skin of this failing government". Alex Henderson, a tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, warned that the tax hike could see the City's high-earners move to lower-tax countries such as Ireland and Switzerland. He said a reduction in tax relief on pension contributions would hit the self-employed.
Richard Lambert, the Confederation of British Industry's director general, said: "The key question for this Budget was whether it set out a credible and rigorous path for restoring the public finances to health. The CBI's preliminary judgement must be that it does not."
Budget at a glance
Top earners
New 50 per cent top rate tax from next April for those earning over £150,000, and their pension tax relief slashed in April 2011.
Pensioners
State pensions to rise by 2.5 per cent. Winter fuel allowance maintained at £250 for over-60s and £400 for over-80s.
Alcohol and tobacco
Taxes up 2 per cent, putting 1p on a pint of beer; 4p on a bottle of wine; and 7p on a packet of 20 cigarettes.
Petrol
Fuel duty up 2p a litre in September, then by 1p a litre each April for four years.
Car scrappage
From May, motorists with cars over 10 years old will get £2,000 off a new car.
Savings
ISA tax-free limit rises to £10,200 (£5,100 cash) for over-50s this year; for everyone next year.
Redundancy pay
Rises from £350 a week to £380, from October.
Unemployed under-25s
After a year, will get a subsidised job or training place.
House buying
Stamp duty holiday for homes up to £175,000 extended to the end of this year.
Grandparents
Those of working age who care for grandchildren will see that work count towards entitlement for basic state pension.
Whitehall spending cuts
£9bn in unspecified "efficiency savings".
Environment
Carbon emissions to be cut by 34 per cent by 2020.
UK economy
To shrink 3.5 per cent this year; then expand by 1.25 per cent next year; and, from 2011, grow annually by 3.5 per cent. Inflation to fall sharply to 1 per cent by the end of 2009.
Public finances
Public borrowing to increase to £175bn this year; £173bn next year; then £130bn, £118bn and £97bn each of the following years. Public debt to rise to 68 per cent of GDP for 2010-11 and peak at 79 per cent in 2013-14.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
We are not interested in camera or photograph, we want to see how our money grows and how we can have foods in out plates. We need jobs.
Labour makes tax the election battleground
The briefcase of Mr. Darling was old, may be 2001, or is my TV old. I do not know but the budget was very rotten. There was nay and yeses from the parliament but no explanations and Mr. Darling kept on talking and robbing the 150,000£ by 50 %.
PM tears up New Labour script with 50p tax rate for highest earners
What we read after the budget, rather the next day, is as important as yesterday, as we now can feel
The heat. IMF, the brain, the bones, and the body of the finance say this. Where are we, we have to wonder now. The savage slump in the world's leading economies is set to be even deeper than previously feared, with recovery unlikely to materialise next year. Therefore, it is 2012 or 2013. Not early.
Deception of the first rank with already leaked points. Here is the biggest farce. If the soft drink manufacturer to name but one for example, gets the week of this and he is a major player in the economy. I am the major shareholder. I know of the price increase. I hoard the soft drinks and let go of these after some time and only informing my colleagues in the supermarkets. Do you see what scene I have created?
Jobless hits 2.1m as public debt soars to £90bn. A real HUGE hole.
Alistair Darling gambles to save economy
He insisted public finances would get back on track with a halving of borrowing within four years as the economy began to recover from the end of the year.
Chancellor has gambled on a rapid economic recovery to rebuild Britain's battered finances as he revealed this year's borrowing would hit a record £175 billion.
Well the way I see this is two folded
He is gambling with our money. He promised the turnaround would have been end of the 2009 or the 2010. The promise now taken a new twist to four years. Therefore, the payback is in 2013 or 2014. Where is the turning of the economy in 2009 or 2010?
A politician is a politician, no matter whet colour you give him or no matter what name you give him. He is to raise the Taxes for, at times, reason we do not know but makes sure we cough up.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Labour makes tax the election battleground
The briefcase of Mr. Darling was old, may be 2001, or is my TV old. I do not know but the budget was very rotten. There was nay and yeses from the parliament but no explanations and Mr. Darling kept on talking and robbing the 150,000£ by 50 %.
The lesson from Budget 2009 is that our politicians are blind to Britain's financial risks
Blind can at hear, but we have a scene where we have no one to see, hear, and feel. That is cruelty, stubbornness, sad attitude for the people, by the people, of the people and that is a democracy at the last bench. . Even Robin Hood was better. He robbed and gave to the needy here all go in the bigger hole.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
The electorate will understand if the Tories have to raise taxes and cut back on reckless borrowing because Labour have left them no alternative. This unfair and massive debt will take our children the next 40 years to repay. Why should they have to suffer and become disadvantaged because of this dysfunctional Government. These are the battle lines upon which the next election will be fought. These greedy, sleazy and hopeless champagne socialists have run out of other people's money.
You folks don't get it, when this party goes out and the next party comes in your all going to be just as screwed.
Because their exactly the same, ran by the same good old boys club just under a different name. They're going to keep lying cheating and stealing the from public because they can, and they know there is nothing you can do about it because you do not live in a democracy and you do not have any control over these politicians and their decisions at all.
I don't see any mention of businesses and corporations cutting down their outrageous profit margins and start selling things at a reasonable price again no matter what the item, food or automobiles.
Some of these people spend more on launch than some people make in a week and that has got to change. Taxing cigarettes and booze and other commodities who do you think that hurts the rich guy's, no
It only hurts the people making hourly wages and trying to just get by.
And the scrappage scheme should be called the scrappage scam!
People that are driving cars 10 years old probably cannot afford to go out and buy a 30 or 40,000 dollar car. That $2000 is barely enough for a down payment and then you suckered into debt again with interests.
And neither party is going to save the world from the destruction we're causing, because it's going to cut into their profit margins. They're willing to kill off the entire planet for greed.
Now we know why they're taking names and DNA for their giant databases,
And why Britain has been turned into a police state. They can see what's coming.
The environment remains a rather irritating inconsequential side issue, no change there ?
it is unsurprising that we are in recession now, because having the real (i.e. international) value of our savings slashed by 40 or 50%, we are holding off spending because of the fear of bankruptcy. I am a pensioner who does two part-time jobs. i would work more, but with ageist employment legislation in place to make life more difficulty for the over 65s, it is not quite as easy as it should be.
100-150K is not a "rich man's salary", and people with this level of salary don't have sophisticated accountants on tap.
This is a typical middle class executive salary - lots of public sector managers, most GP's, school headmasters, and in the private sector, successful executives and sales people - and relatively few "bankers" who are mostly paid a pittance, with a very few on much higher remuneration.
So we can best think of this as a clumsy government claw-back of cash from those public sector execs who have become "over-paid" due to incompetent government contract negotiations.
It will result in a shift back to the "payment in kind" culture of the 1970's (lots more company cars, expenses perks, private healthcare, company credit cards etc)
Remember also that nowadays payment in kind is taxable and generally is. The government is greedy and does not miss a trick.
I think everyone should pay tax - they should determine a value that a person or family needs to survive at a minimum level for someone working and make that the value from when you start paying tax. They should determine a value that a person or family needs to have a lifestyle which we would expect as a standard that we would like to regard as an average. Note that taxation limits are for family circumstances and not personal. You have a lower rate tax in between where people contribute a smaller nominal amount, then you have your upper rate which is where everyone who earns more pays the same rate. One thought - should this increase indefinitely or should there be a ceiling as to how much income tax they pay? The law should be changed to prevent avoidance which will put a lot of accountants out of business but then a lot of them are crooks anyway.
The rate is determined mathematically - calculate how much tax is required for the next year, divide it by the amount money people make and their is your figure.
However much Brown and Darling wriggle and scream like stuck pigs, the election will be fought on issues of competence, integrity and transparency. Labour may as well get used to this because anything which sounds or feels like spin will rebound on them - the voting public have grown up.