UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 8° London Hi 8°C / Lo 4°C

Lords set to inflict crushing defeat on 42-day detention

By Nigel Morris, deputy political editor
Monday, 13 October 2008

Lord Falconer, left, and Lord Goldsmith are expected to lead Labour critics of the measure

GETTY

Lord Falconer, left, and Lord Goldsmith are expected to lead Labour critics of the measure

The Government is heading for a resounding defeat in the House of Lords today over moves to allow terror suspects to be detained without charge for up to 42 days.

Peers of all parties, judges who sit on the non-aligned crossbenches and several bishops are lining up to vote against the controversial extension from 28 days.

Lord Falconer of Thoroton, the former Lord Chancellor, and Lord Goldsmith, the former Attorney-General, are expected to lead the Labour critics of the measure.

Such is the scale of the opposition that the proposal, which only scraped through the Commons by nine votes in June, could be rejected by a majority of more than 100.

Downing Street insisted the Government remains committed to the measure because of the scale, complexity and international nature of terrorist conspiracies. It confirmed it was determined to put the detention plan to the vote this afternoon on the Counter-Terrorism Bill.

If it is thrown out by a large margin, Ministers would be left with an acute dilemma over whether to bring it back to the Commons. They fear that they could lose a subsequent vote among MPs as several Labour backbenchers have indicated that they only backed the Government reluctantly in the knife-edge vote four months ago.

Speculation is growing that the proposal could be put on ice after defeat today. The Government has refused to be drawn on "hypothetical" questions, but some MPs believe Ministers will eventually decide not to use the Parliament Act to force the measure on to the statute book.

Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty, said: "We've learned about the excesses of markets. Now it's time we woke up to the excesses of governments. If the House of Lords doesn't stand up for the Magna Carta, then it's hard to know what the Magna Carta is for."

The human rights organisation Amnesty International will stage a "mass sleepwalk" in Leeds by protesters wearing dressing gowns and clutching pillows and blankets to coincide with the Lords vote.

Kate Allen, its UK director, said: "There is a real danger people in Britain are sleepwalking into an assault on our human rights. Plans to extend detention without charge should be abandoned once and for all. We don't want them returning under another guise – not next month, not next year."

David Davis, the former shadow Home Secretary, predicted the proposal would be effectively killed off by defeat in the Lords. He told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "I think it will be thrown out by a huge majority."

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "We will continue to press for the changes needed to protect the public from terrorism as [the proposal] makes its way through the House of Lords this week. We are not prepared to discuss hypothetical scenarios.

"The Government is determined to give the police the powers they need to tackle terrorism. That is why it is right to legislate to put in place the reserve power to go beyond 28 days if in future there is a clear operational need for it."

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

25 Comments

If you can't bring charges within 28 days, you haven't got a case and wont be able to bring them within 42 days either. Don't forget that, since the time of the ancient romans, most terrorism has been fomented by Governments trying to frighten their people into compliance and obedience. Giving the state more powers to fight terrorism is like giving children more candy to fight tooth decay.

Posted by OblongLemon | 13.10.08, 20:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The bleeding heart Liberals are confusing the terrorists rights with civilian rights and the two can live within society separately.The uncontrolled open borders are the main problem and are being suppressed by all media afraid of political correct dogma.The open borders are being incouraged by internationalists in the federal gov.and the RIFIA.

Posted by ED BASELEY | 13.10.08, 20:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Good on the lords! Quite a substantial defeat, too!

lead the way dogsolitude!

I think we should introduce a 'union' for taxpayers, since they're treating it like a business now anyway!

Posted by Sara | 13.10.08, 20:00 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The biggest threat to the people of Britain is the Government of Britain. It's been astonishing to watch the role out of the totalitarian police state and the absolute passivity of the peasanty as they allow this to happen.

Posted by bilejones | 13.10.08, 19:55 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

That's OK, they've tanked it, and quite rightly so...

Now all we need to do is get rid of the ID Card/National Identity Register, DNA database, stop councils tapping phones etc. etc. etc.

Posted by dogsolitude_uk | 13.10.08, 19:44 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

dogsolitude_uk , maybe; although they could do this anyway.

Banks already have to report "suspicious" transactions with no guidelines on what these actually are. As seems common nowadays, there is a presumption of guilt rather than innocence.

Similarly, employers have to check on the identity of employees, and are punished if they get it wrong.

It's a simple matter for the government to say "and the only way you can prove you did your best and noy be punished if you make a mistake is if you used and ID card to identify the customer/employee".

Posted by Jon McCulloch | 13.10.08, 16:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

dogsolitude_uk ...... that's a very interesting point!

Posted by John Davies | 13.10.08, 16:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I'm curious, and hopefully worrying unnecessarily, but if the Government now has stakes in banks, can they insist on Banks using the ID Card and National Identity Register system to verify withdrawals/deposits?

If so, the details of the time and place of use of the card/database will be logged on the database...

I know this is off-topic (though the issues of privacy and freedom are entwined), but I really don't trust the Gov not to try and pull something like that as a coercive measure...

Posted by dogsolitude_uk | 13.10.08, 15:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

This was done to appease Bully Boy Bush. Guess what, he ain't no more. Get over it Brown and do you job of better surveillance and not aYankee trick or treat grab bag.

Thank heavens it looks like the McCain/Palin ticket is going down.

Posted by MA | 13.10.08, 14:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

And Mr. D - watch you don't get banged up for 42 days for 'inciting hate against The Minisrty of Peace' '

Posted by Sara | 13.10.08, 13:43 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

25 Comments


Preparing for power

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date