UK

Rain (AM and PM) 4° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Lumley in fresh attack on Labour over rights of Gurkhas

Veterans return to haunt PM as he seeks to regain political initiative

By Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Editor

Gordon Brown's attempt to regain the political initiative following questions about his leadership faltered yesterday when the actress Joanna Lumley unleashed a fresh broadside over his handling of Gurkhas' rights.

The Prime Minister was also warned by a senior Labour MP that it would be a "kamikaze move" to press ahead with plans to part-privatise the Royal Mail.

Desperate to get back on the front foot after a torrid fortnight, Mr Brown followed his weekly Cabinet meeting with a speech on education policy at a south London school. But six miles away in Westminster Ms Lumley launched a damning attack of Downing Street's failure to respond to the campaign to allow all Gurkha veterans to live in Britain.

Mr Brown suffered a humiliating Commons defeat last week over plans to restrict Gurkhas' resettlement rights. It led to claims that the Prime Minister's inner circle was increasingly out of touch with the public mood.

Ms Lumley, below, who has championed their cause, told MPs she had written three times asking for a meeting with the Prime Minister, but had only received one reply. She also said she had royal backing for the campaign and told the Home Affairs Select Committee she was shocked the Government had not changed policy as a result of last week's defeat.

"I don't know where else we have to go. We have gone to the High Court, we have gone to the press. We have gone to the people and to Parliament. All those people have backed the Gurkhas. Who do we go to next? The Royal Family are not allowed to get involved, although personally I have had a letter of support. I do not understand democracy, if this is what democracy is."

Downing Street denied snubbing the actress, saying it had waited until policy on the issue was clarified before replying. It also said she had been offered a meeting with Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary.

The Government yesterday stressed it was pressing ahead with plans to sell a minority stake in Royal Mail to a private buyer. The sale has been condemned by almost 150 Labour MPs, including nine ministerial aides, and threatens to leave Mr Brown relying on the Conservatives to push the controversial policy through Parliament. The vote is scheduled to take place shortly after the European and council elections on 4 June, which are widely expected to go against Labour.

John Grogan, the Labour MP for Selby, said: "I think it would be a kamikaze move to bring it back then. A deal has got to be done between ministers and backbenchers. We cannot afford to have a June and July of further big divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party."

Before yesterday's Cabinet meeting Mr Brown had a private meeting with Hazel Blears, the Communities Secretary, who condemned Labour's "lamentable failures" in getting its message across in an interview with The Observer. Despite Ms Blears appearing to mock Mr Brown's appearance on YouTube last week, the Prime Minister is continuing to use the site as a campaigning tool, releasing a party political broadcast on the internet before it was shown on television.

Earlier, Mr Brown's speech at a Lewisham school did not pass without incident as he was confronted by protesters opposing the closure of a nearby school. He was also photographed talking to pupils with a wall display behind featuring prominent swastikas – part of a school project on the Second World War.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Death throes
[info]nled63 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 12:59 am (UTC)

Since when did a Labour Prime Minister rely on Ulster Unionists & the Conservative opposition to steamroller needless, arrogant & inappropriate measures through the house? The death-throes of this truly arrogant & inappropriate prime minister are an agony to witness. I mean, goodness me,
Ms. Joanna Lumley has already thrown the most unfavourable light upon this gurning booby, & the poor fool STILL doesn't get it. Brown's attempts to follow young Barry in his masterul use of the internet has led to yet another monumental humiliation, & blow me if Brown isn't STILL trying. It's ghastly, ghastly. We still have over a year of this nonsense to endure, after which we will all be rewarded for our suffering by being hurled under the train of an incoming Tory government. Perhaps old Gordon can join them?
THE GURKHAS WILL WIN:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 05:01 am (UTC)
The Gurkhas will win. They have served this country and are entitled to the rights of settlement. This dysfunctional Government, despite all its spin, have been determined to put every obstacle into the path of a just settlement. Labour thinks that the concession of 'not being deported whilst their cases are being heard' will satisfy the public. This weak concession does not solve the problem, it conveniently transfers it till after the next election. There will be bigger and louder demonstrations.
The Tories and Lib/Dems will ensure they gain the right of settlement and this Government are finished. This Government would rather let in illegal immigrants than these brave, honourable soldiers.
Not impressed
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
When she hovered that Ghurkha knife in front of the cameras I personally was not impressed considering the issues around knife crime, it seemed such an unpleasant, aggressive way to put a point across.

I didn't know that unelected celebs should have exclusive access to the corridors of power and determine government policy just because they where in a Bond film, did you ?
Re: Not impressed
[info]l3enz0 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
Neither am I . Instead of concentrating on how the point was delivered lets look at the point being made and whether it is valid . Lets also not even mention unelected when refering to Gordno's gubbermunt and the unelected non-celebs that he chooses to surround himself with . Also , I hardly think that one standard mail response constitutes exclusive access and even if it did , so what ? Who are the Gubbermunt supposedly here for ?

And lastly , lets not assume that Lumley's involvement has anything to do with her career rather than her Father's many years serving with the Gurkha's .
Humble Sparrow
[info]nled63 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 07:54 am (UTC)

Yes, & ditto for all the other celebs who have somehow managed to slide from their various stages & film sets into roles that resemble those of politicians - skillful or otherwise. This curious phenomenon has as much to do with the impoverishment of originality & ideas in the "authentic" political arena, as well as the blurring of edges between reality & fiction in the general public's mind, which again has as much to do with over-saturation by the media as anything else. Life imitating art, or vice-versa? Hard to say at this point in time!
Rights; civil liberties; truth and Labour!
[info]ron753 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 08:22 am (UTC)
In the very unlikely event of this government issuing a statement that happens to be truthful and honest, nobody, but nobody, will believe them. We have a government which is nothing but a gang of crooks! Gordon Brown missed his chance to reverse the policies of the criminal B'liar, and he has given us more of the same. So.......let's get him and cohorts out of office as soon as possible!
The Gurkha
[info]diana200 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
I, too, wrote to Downing Street. I received an asinine reply from some bureaucrat who cited a lot of inhuman laws banning the Gurkhas from living in the UK. My father had a Gurkha driver in WWII. He always said what an incredibly brave man he was as well as being humorous and very alert. By refusing to take a certain right turn, he most certainly saved my father's life. What on earth is the matter with the PM that he cannot understand the nation's concern about these brave men?

Thank you.
DdeM
Umbria, Italy
Re: The Gurkha
[info]ggarlick46 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:25 pm (UTC)
Well said.
They just don't get it
[info]deimosp wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:05 am (UTC)
Public opinion, "moral high ground", Lords, even after being defeated in parliament and still Gordon wont do anything to change his mind. He is meant to represent the people. When he ws elected he ws not handed a dictatorship for 5 years !! Opps, sorry, he ws not elected to the post of PM - I should say when he was NOT ELECTED (to be PM), he was not handed a dictatorship role.

On occasions he has said they need to listen more. He is even holding cabinet meetings around the country (at a cost to the taxpayer of GRP 200 000 a time) so he can get more in touch with public opinion. But when it is thrust in his face he still totally ignores it. Unbelievable.
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
It is all very well rewarding the Gurkas for their brave service to Britain; but sadly once they settle here; their offspring are only going to learn the ways of the chavs in run down sink estates.

Even the upright elders of the elderly Gurka community will not be able to save their youth from the "Simon Cowell" wannabees who infest the Chav-dom Culture ruining Britain.

It is about time Lumley and others put their efforts into saving Britain from years of Thatcherite abuse and even the bravery of the Gurkas will not help fight that battle, we need the intellectual equivalents to tackle the likes of the recently departed state enemy number one ...none other than the slimy Tony Blair who have truely shafted Britain and jumped ship in its time of need.
Dehra Dun.
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
The government is morally defunct on the issue of Gurkhas (and pretty much all else).
Careful what you wish for!
[info]project911 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:46 am (UTC)
It is tempting (albeit for only a nanosecond) to sympathise with Gordon Brown. He has been promoted to a position far beyond his limited capabilites, in fact it is difficult to see him in a less appropriate job, (maybe a frontman for a new boyband).
Having said that, he could have broadened his political horizons whilst in office but instead, he schemed, plotted & eventually drove the knife in Tony Blair out of sheer naked, political ambition.

Now he has the top job, he hasn't a clue what to do with it. Grandstanding with world leaders, carefully scripted speeches and an autocratic cabinet are not the way to win support & public admiration.

Now Labour MP's can see the slow-motion train wreck coming & know there is virtually nothing they can do to avoid it. The only person who can't, is the deluded, meglomaniac at #10. Good riddance!
Nuliabour
[info]billylad wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:52 am (UTC)
I wonder what those who helped bring down Johnny M, a decent man, feel when they see what they unleashed with the appalling Bliar and Cyclops ruining Britain. Bliar is theshallowest, most devious and self-serving politician we've ever had. He has the blood of thousands on his hands. Cyclops is a humourless, dogmatic, bungling, tax-grabbing idiot with not a single, solitary clue about what actually happens in the real world. My economics lecturers had a far more profound grasp of the country's finances. Cyclops doesn't care for anything except trying to wrong-foot the opposition. May he go soon, and slide quickly into well-deserved oblivion.
[info]mykleboon wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 10:54 am (UTC)
"Downing street denied snubbing the actress, saying it had waited until policy on the issue was clarified before replying"

If you are only allowed to make representations after policy has been decided, then what is the point?
[info]deimosp wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 11:24 am (UTC)
That is how Brown works. Parliement is there to rubber stamp his decisions. Other opinions are irrelevant. She should be surprised he is even going to notify her of his decision.
TROUBLEMAKING LUMLEY AND UNGRATEFUL GURKHAS
[info]scorpioncircle wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 11:14 am (UTC)
Joanna Lumley is a trouble maker and the Gurkhas deeply ungrateful. They will never be satisfied and will always ask for something else. I have always said this. In 1997 they were given a substantial redundancy payment and a pension from the age of 33, which would be considered a fortune and an excellent income in Nepal. That they are required to support extended families, and in many cases, includes multiple wives and children, is their concern. The MoD is not responsible for this. In 2004 Tony Blair did them a great favour by granting those post 97 indefinite leave to remain with the opportunity, if wanted, to apply in 12 months down the line, for a British passport. Then came legally-aided expensive High Court representation, then the actress Joanna Lumley brandishing a kukri knife, a highly dangerous weapon, outside Parliament. Isn't that a criminal offence? The most baffling sight of all was her sitting before a Home Office Committee. Who does she think she is ? Who cares if a "senior Royal" backs the Gurkhas. We now have one of the veteran wheelchair Gurkhas, Mr Gurung, asking that his granddaughter be given a permanent resident visa in spite of her having overstayed her visitors visa. This is will never end. Watch this space.
Re: TROUBLEMAKING LUMLEY AND UNGRATEFUL GURKHAS
[info]jjxxxx wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 02:45 pm (UTC)
Peter Mandelson, is that you?
Re: TROUBLEMAKING LUMLEY AND UNGRATEFUL GURKHAS
[info]ggarlick46 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 09:22 pm (UTC)
How grateful should they be?Grateful that a lot of them laid down their lives for an ungrateful moron like you?
Gurkhas
[info]clothcap wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 02:55 pm (UTC)
I wasn't around when GB was at war but looking at Britain's progressively worse governance since the war, perhaps the Gurkhas didn't do us a favour in helping us win. We are governed by an unelected puppet PM whose strings are pulled by an unelected body of Europeans whose sole ambition seems to be to spend money on ever greater disasters in their megalomaniacal pursuit of world government. Pretty much Hitler's ambition. They couldn't care less about Britain except for the billions of pounds we pay for the privilege of being shafted.
On a personal level, I believe the Gurkhas should be allowed to reside here. Their numbers are trifling compared to the influx of e.g Pakistanis, Europeans, Asians who have a weaker claim.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date