Mandelson and Treasury at odds over bailout for Jaguar
Bridging loan considered but Darling fears dangerous precedent could be set
Friday 19 December 2008
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
The Government is edging towards an emergency rescue package for Jaguar Land Rover in an attempt to protect tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs.
The luxury car firm employs 15,000 workers in the West Midlands and a further 60,000 other jobs in the region rely indirectly on the firm.
Ministers insist that its Indian parent company, Tata, must take prime responsibility for its financial health. But they also admit that Jaguar Land Rover cannot be allowed to fail because of its importance to the UK economy and its research and development expertise.
The company – whose profits have collapsed in the past six months, forcing it to lay off 850 staff – is seeking up to £1bn of state assistance to tide it over the next 18 months. There is no question of the firm being given a blank cheque, in the form of a subsidy or of state investment, but ministers are considering offering a bridging loan or credit guarantees to Jaguar, which was bought earlier this year by Tata for £1bn.
The Government is likely to offer Jaguar short-term help, amounting to tens of millions of pounds, within the next week to maintain its cash flow. That would be followed by a detailed agreement in the new year to underwrite its loans with state money. News of the talks emerged after Tata said it was to sponsor Ferrari's Grand Prix team for an unspecified sum.
Contacts between Jaguar and two Whitehall departments – Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and the Treasury – have intensified in recent days. Ministers are also talking to other struggling car manufacturers, including Vauxhall, and the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.
Their plight was underlined bythe society's figures, published yesterday, showing production in Britain has slumped by one-third. More than 97,600 cars rolled off UK production lines last month, a fall of 33 per cent since November 2007. Commercial vehicle production fell by 50 per cent as cash-strapped companies cancelled orders for vans and lorries.
Jaguar has told ministers it is a healthy and viable business – making a £327m profit last year and a £310m profit in the first half of 2008 – but has asked for help guaranteeing "short-term liquidity" because the major banks are reluctant to lend cash during the downturn.
Business ministers are understood to be sympathetic to Jaguar's pleas for one-off help. The Treasury is more sceptical,concerned over whether it would set a dangerous precedent by offering the car maker a lifeline in the week that the retail chain Woolworths announced the closure of 800 shops.
Yesterday, Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, acknowledged that Jaguar faced some "immediate financial pressures" but insisted he was not going to be "bounced into a decision on this or any other company".
He said: "We have to take stock and form a very tough appraisal of the particular circumstances of any company that's coming along to us for assistance. So if, in the immediate term, there is some bridging, a help that we can offer, then we would consider it."
The Government fears that advanced technical skills could be lost to Britain if Jaguar, which spent £400m last year on research and development, was forced to sack staff.
Ministers are also conscious of several marginal parliamentary seats in the West Midlands. Seven constituencies – including Redditch, held by the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith – would fall to the Conservatives with a swing of 5 per cent. Another three would be captured by David Cameron if the swing is 10 per cent.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British




Comments