MPs call for embryo change to allow 'saviour siblings'
Wednesday 01 August 2007
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Restrictions on the use of embryo technology to produce "saviour siblings" with parts that can be used to treat brothers or sisters should be eased, a group of peers and MPs will say today.
They will call on the Government to widen its Human Tissue and Embryos Bill to allow "saviour siblings"to be created where there is a "serious" risk to the life of a brother or sister, rather than only in cases where a condition is "life-threatening". If adopted by the Government, it could lead to more embryos being produced to use for treatment of existing siblings, and it is certain to lead to a battle in Parliament. The joint committee of Lords and MPs said umbilical cord blood stem cells could be used under the draft bill to treat an existing child suffering from a life-threatening condition. The committee acknowledged that some people were fundamentally opposed to all embryo testing because of the ethical problems it raised, saying a child was a "gift" not a "source of biological material".
But the committee concluded: "We recognise this is a delicate area. However, given the Government's apparent acceptance of the principle of selecting for 'saviour siblings' we do not understand why the practice is limited to 'life-threatening' conditions capable of treatment using umbilical cord blood stem cells."
They recommended the draft bill should be amended to substitute "serious" for "life threatening" in the conditions required to allow it.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments