UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 12° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Exclusive

Now it's British jobs for British graduates

Exclusive: Ministers plan tightening of immigration controls to help university leavers find work

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor

The Government may restrict the number of highly skilled migrants allowed into Britain because ministers fear many of the record 400,000 graduates leaving university this summer will fail to find work in the recession.

Phil Woolas, the Immigration minister, wants to tighten the points-based system for people from outside the EU so they do not take jobs that might otherwise go to British graduates. Between 10,000 and 18,000 well-qualified foreigners are expected to come to the UK this year to look for work without having a job lined up.

Mr Woolas told The Independent: "The points-based system that has been introduced allows us to toughen the criteria, and clearly in the economic situation that is something it is beholden on us to do. We want to maintain the highest possible levels of British graduate employment."

The proposal has been under consideration for some weeks and ministers insist it is not a reaction to the row over the recruitment of foreign workers at the Lindsey oil refinery in Lincolnshire. However, it is bound to be seen as an attempt to ensure "British jobs for British graduates".

Under the recently introduced points system (which Mr Woolas proposes tightening), highly skilled people from outside the EU, such as scientists, IT specialists, lawyers, financial service workers and entrepreneurs can enter Britain to search for work. Normally graduates, they can stay initially for two years.The Home Office estimates they could boost the economy by up to £84m a year.

Government sources said Mr Woolas's plan was "one option" under consideration but that no final decision has been taken. It could face opposition from John Denham, the Skills Secretary, who is believed to think there is no need to change the points system since it already takes account of possible skills shortages.

However, the Government is under pressure from MPs to tighten the rules because of the downturn. Labour's Frank Field and the Conservatives' Nicholas Soames, who have set up a cross-party group on balanced migration, have written to Gordon Brown, asking him to act. They said the new points system would allow tens of thousands of highly skilled people to come to Britain looking for work. "We believe that, in a recession, this cannot be allowed to continue," the two MPs said. "We should not be allowing non-EU economic migrants to look for work."

The Woolas plan will be discussed by cabinet ministers as they draw up a package of measures on immigration over the next few weeks. Other ideas include forcing employers who hire skilled workers to advertise the posts at Jobcentres before they look abroad. This could affect between 60,000 and 80,000 jobs in construction, hotel management, teaching and nursing.

Last night, experts said there could be short-term political and economic attractions in curbing the number of foreign graduates, but warned that it could be counterproductive in the long run. Tim Field, head of migration, equalities and citizenship at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the points system might prove an "inflexible" tool. "These are people every country wants," he said. "This would send a signal to others. Putting others off from applying might not be a good idea."

Other government proposals include a crackdown on "bogus" colleges which allow non-EU students to come to Britain as a backdoor means of immigration, and tighter checks on foreign students so they do not overstay.

Mr Denham has outlined plans to persuade British firms to take on graduates as "interns" in the hope that they will keep on the best and brightest so their companies are in a stronger position after the recession.

As the Government sought to raise the proportion of young people going into higher education to 50 per cent, the number of graduates rose from 206,000 in 1997 to 358,000 in 2007. The proportion of graduates in "non-degree level" jobs five years after leaving university has risen too.

John Cridland, deputy director general of the CBI, said companies were already cutting the number of migrant workers they recruit because of the recession. He believed the Government's Migration Advisory Committee would suggest that fewer migrants from outside the EU would be needed when it next reports. He expected "they will not see the same need for non-EU labour in the same numbers because of the need to provide as many employment opportunities as possible for the unemployed". He added: "All I'm suggesting is that the market will correct itself but what we cannot avoid is a significant increase in unemployment which is a sad but inevitable consequence of recessions."

From sociology to gas fitting: Three students look to the future

Graeme Waddell, 30

Criminology and sociology, Stirling University

I have been toying with the idea of doing a postgraduate course in social work but I need to know my results before I can consider this. I have also been considering learning a skilled trade as I'm worried my degree might not be worth anything in these uncertain times. I hope I haven't wasted the past few years as a student, when I would have been better off becoming a plumber or a gas fitter, where there are more opportunities. My student loan does not worry me as I am used to being in debt. My friends are going to Amsterdam when we graduate but I'll stay here looking for a job.

Helen Cook, 23

Occupational therapy, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh

For a newly qualified physiotherapist the situation in Scotland is pretty hopeless – the NHS has been useless in creating new posts. I think I will travel to India next year. Hopefully I can volunteer in a hospital to gain experience. A lot of people on my course (five out of 40) are getting posts in New Zealand – they have a great scheme where they train you, sort out your visas and so on. When I do look for a job, I don't think I'll find it easy, partly because I will be quite picky. I'm not thinking I will have to take anything because of the credit crunch. I think graduates will still be picky and hold out for what they want.

Franck Martin, 22

Politics, University of Glasgow

It couldn't be a worse time to be a graduate. I'm going to try and stay out of the job market for at least a year or two as there are so few jobs available for graduates now. I will do some work experience and keep on with my work stacking shelves part time at Tesco so I earn enough money for a postgraduate degree in either public policy or journalism. I would like to work in the media but the civil service appeals because of the job security it provides. My brother works in the civil service and he says their graduate schemes are more popular than ever.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The other side of "get on yer bike" (if you're not a 'white collar'
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 02:59 am (UTC)
Nothing new there. Government has stoutly resisted (I can quote Dobson, Primarolo and Johnson and with a little more research could no doubt unearth others) European competition with 'white collars' and jolly good chaps, ever since it took over from 'the other' self-serving organised political gang (the one that set Britain's bananarepublicanisation in motion under the leadership of the children's milk snatcher)

It's when you are a worker, like the welders / biolermakers in current dispute, that they say to you 'oh, the EU says we must allow it' mode - having dropped the earlier claim that zillions of unskilled and often illegal, immigrants are "needed" as cheap fodder for the (black) economy that kept the Brown economy afloat for a decade.

Whether both flavours of governmental conduct for the past thirty years, since the children's milk snatcher took office, is symptomatic of schizophrenia or mere unscrupulous day to day opportunism, is unclear, but not so the fact that government has been seriously dysfunctional and actually anti-social.
The World's Job for the World's Graduate
[info]leesiuhoi wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 03:59 am (UTC)
My boss comes from UK and we have hundreds of highly paid managers in my company alone. I mean the top tier paid job in Hong Kong. Furthermore the company recruit graduate worldwide for people who want an International career and quite a few of them are from UK.

I worked in UK and US once for 2 years to spend time network with people in our office there so that I can act as a bridge when I return home.

China is buying UK tools for its stimilation projects and they need UK staff to come over to teach their people how to use the tools.

If I were you, I would learn the Chinese language (as much as Chinese graduates learn English). My daughter is studying in UK to learn English and Spanish.

The world is for all of you to conquer. We Chinese say, "Do not look at the sky from the bottom of a well."
Re: The World's Job for the World's Graduate
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
Ah! Is that where those with brains and balls went to? We're left with the spectacularly incompetent chinless jolly good chaps brigade, plus an oversupply of social 'scientists', economists and lawyers, in contrast with you lot and the Indians who churn out zillions of competent engineers.
Re: The World's Job for the World's Graduate
[info]m_sole wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
Well said!
It seems much more comfortable to stay at home than moving abroad.
Because of the downturn, it might be useful for UK people to move and spend their professionality where required. And to learn a foreign language. Exactly as world's graduate do, successfully and happily.
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:23 am (UTC)
Britain has a shortage in many fields; Medicine; Nursing; certain types of engineering; why don't students study subjects that are in need.

Now tell me how many Media Studies or Socialogy and Travel Studies or Criminolgy graduates do we need ??? Subsidize only those subjects that are in need; those obscure and abstract subjects should be entirely funded by students and their sponsors and not be a burden on the taxpayer.
Nursing
[info]unlikelylad wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
The health service survives on a high proportion of o'seas placements. We have, it seems to me, taken a large quantity of health care professionals away from their home environment and used them to keep the hospital beds in use over here. I have no doubt that they are as effecient and good as home grown nurses but I question this strategy as a long term basis of success.

From my own experience, I note that we are very eager to fail a large proportion of the nursing graduate intake as a natural culling process rather than offer the educational and academic supports that people need. This shortfall is then made up by the overseas contigent.

The nursing degrees / diplomas that people have to take to enter into the profession are highly academic, contain a great deal of biology and maths. Our educational system fail to deliver the level required for many. Therefore the failure rate is quite high.

It seems to me that this is a major failing of the system.



British jobs for British graduates
[info]redkitte wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:30 am (UTC)
We need to look at grass roots.
Not only is it 'depression suicide' to look after your own graduates where there has already been an investment in education. The thought of further costs of the graduates in there support if unable to find Post Graduate positions where their skills and education can be fully utilised and that is what they want and require - A job at the end.
Towards the other end of the scale make more opportunties for Apprenticeships so as we can use those skils For Great Britain
from ReddkiTTe, Berkshire.
Re: British jobs for British graduates
[info]ziva10 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:06 am (UTC)
As a student I have to say I'm quite unaware that you're somehow financing me, if this is the case please let me know & I'll let you know where to send the cheque!

Also please note Apprenticeships aren't really appropriate for a vast amount of jobs, some knowledge has to be obtained first ... the idea of an apprentice doctor "learning on the job" terrifies me!
The other side of "get on yer bike"
[info]tomhmacf wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
Splendid post, cronyblatcher; New Labour hypocrisy at its foulest!
[info]davecz wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 09:20 am (UTC)
Shocker! all three students are at Scottish universities! The Independent has dared to venture out of the London bubble!
A degree isn't a skill!
[info]hodgeey wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 10:08 am (UTC)
We need less graduates and more technicians and engineers.

Also, teaching our young reading, writing and arithmetic would be useful.
Protectionism at it's worst.
[info]smarttog wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
Throughout the boom times it was generally belived that foreign workers gave Britain a competative edge in the world. This new policy is shortsighted and unnecessary. It will do nothing to alter the level of foreign workers entering the country from the E.U. Which are the majority by far.

What the goverment should be doing is putting in place schemes to improve the skills of our own work force so they can compeate.

Also many foreign workers are suspected of working for lower rates then their British counterparts. I don't know if this is true but if it is, this practise could be legislated out by requiring more transparency equality and fairness in recruitment practises. Particularly where foreign recruitment is predominant.

This government has a terrible track record for introducing policies which have not been fully thought through and this appears to be another one. They appear to be so desperatly wanting to cling to power, that they will introduce one populist policy after another.

They didn't go to the country when they could have won but thankfully they will have to in 2010
Skilled Immigration Control: a retrograde step
[info]rkrohela wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
In this era of globalization, it is very important to allow competitiveness to be the central theme of any recruitment. The protectionist measures to control immigration and give unfair advantage to British born graduates or workers is a retrograde step which will take Britain backwards. The highly skilled migrants under the Tier 1 system have contributed largely to the British economy. They do not live on benefits and contribute towards taxation and national insurance.

They have been proven to be more talented, hardworking and committed than ethnic workers in many cases. If Britain wants to retain its stature as a global power, it should not take these protectionist measures.
if there is a will there is a way!
[info]capler wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 10:20 am (UTC)
i agree that the problem of exceed is certainly higher, but i also criticize those who dont wish to change their choices. If there are less opportunities in certain field, people should forget to find the job in that field. On the other hand people should learn some new skills and change their attitude. You never know that the your new choice might change your world. Dont find me funny but some people are actually lazy and they dont want to learn something new. There are some countries in the world who are not as badly affected as we are. If chinese and asians can come and make money overhere so why cant we go and make some fortune? We need willingness to do so. how many of you have thought of changing your attitude. some people actually are doing graduation in useless sectors and mourning about not finding jobs and blaming on others.
Phil Woolas & Graduates
[info]bingmat_1982 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 10:30 am (UTC)
Phil Woolas, though his measures are irrelevant, is backing our Cash Accounting campaign that aims to free up cash flow for many small businesses throughout Britain. This will help to maintain companies' graduate recruitment activities. Cash flow is critical to employment programmes and Graduate schemes are always the hardest hit, since they involve training and development costs.

Phil will be coming into our offices on Friday to discuss this with us (we're in his constituency) and give comments to the press. I'm inviting any other members of the press to come and discuss this in further detail. We are a company that takes on 5-6 graduates per year and this has been impacted by restrictions on cash-flow that the Government could easily change.

Though we can't comment on the intricacies of campaigning strictly for British Graduates (we are an international translation company who depend on hiring the best of international linguists), our campaign helps British COMPANIES to recruit Graduates. Ergo - This doesn't seem to be a "British-Graduate" problem, but a wholesale problem with sustainable graduate recruitment in Britain - which is related, though dictinctly different.

Matthew Connaughton
Marketing Manager, Applied Language
Oldham

0870 225 0284
Don't talk to me about graduates
[info]ludwig400 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 10:51 am (UTC)
I'm out of work at the moment after 30+ years working in the same sector. In the last couple of weeks I've begun to notice that almost every job I see advertised in that sector is demanding some sort of degree and this is not just confined to the area where my years of experience are now of no use. We now have a glut of inexperienced, common sense free, cheap graduates for employers to use as their next pool of low paid workers. I even saw a builder's merchant demanding a degree today (no indication of degree subject matter just that it must be 2:1, whatever that means in the real world). The top jobs are filled by the silver spooned products of the old boys network (whether in finance, media, the arts etc), the jobs previously filled by people like myself (5 o-levels, worked hard and played the game for the last 30 years) are now being filled by bloody graduates and the jobs that people would have traditionally fallen back on to get by are now all paying minimum wage (which is only of any use to the immigrant work force). If you're out of work, over 40 and the product of a 70's state education then you've had it in this country.
Re: Don't talk to me about graduates
[info]capler wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 12:21 pm (UTC)
Mr. ludwig is absolutely right! graduates are utterly nonsense. they think them are above non-graduates. If you look at famous personalities, they are/were not graduates. For example, bill gates, richard branson, laxmi mittal, warren buffet etc. So why graduates are considering themselves better than anyone else? why opportunities should be given to graduates first. As per my knowledge, skilled and experienced people are far better than fresh graduates. Let graduates struggle what we have struggled. Graduates need everything ready on platter. Let them suffer what we had too in the past. Education is something but not everything as they expect.
Re: Don't talk to me about graduates
[info]ziva10 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:23 am (UTC)
"they think them are above non-graduates" - this isn't really the best sentence to sum up your argument ; - )

Also please note it is not really evidential to make-up wild statements about the beliefs of the hugely diverse demographic that makes up the student body.
Now it's British jobs for British graduates
[info]buddhdevp wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
The concept - British Jobs for British People, is being explained to please the voting bulk knowing that there is a heavy price to pay as job losses increses. During the past few years the Governmnet has introduced point system to restrict non EU workers entering UK beyond its needs in the employment market. The EU treaty has left the doors wide open for workers from the member states, an it is not simple to close them without serious reprucrsions. There is a 'political' grey area when it comes to the what is Britishness and who is Brtish! For many they are the people with darker skin colour, diffrent language and religion and cultural practices. It is not about just Italians, polish or Europeans only. The migrants have been the back bone of the many public services, mainly due to the fact that they brought skills and knowledge ready made with them and prepared to work long and unsocial hours for peanuts in areas where the traditional local people were not prepared to work at cheaper rates. It paid the economy boom that we all have enjoyed. Playing the 'English' card when there is a serious economic crisis and job looses are in the air, a poitical game to swing the voters who were saying , 'no one is loking after us the minorities have all the rights'. It is a dangerous game of far left and Labour has fallen into it. Look at those refinearies; how many BME workers are there in the demonstration and in the jobs at upper level; than kust sweepers! Gordon Brown is walking on a thin ice here. I am surprised the new equality commission do not see the danger. It is not too late to cool it. And, Mr Cameron, Sir, this is your pole with that thick oil- one worng move and the Labour will have you sliding well down as they ahve the upper hand on the 'right wind' territory on this one.

Buddhdev Pandya
Bedfordshire

when...
[info]liveon35mm wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:15 am (UTC)
will they start kicking us out then?

(a EU doctorate working in UK for almost 8 years now)

The Decline of The British Empire
http://valueless.wordpress.com/wp-admin/
Time to shut and bolt the door
[info]rickraider wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:28 am (UTC)
All non-EU immigration must be halted now irrespective of competence and educational achievements. There is absolutely no justification for this type of immigration. All illegal immigrants must be extradited from Britain, and all loopholes allowing relations of those immigrants that are legally here to also migrate to Britain must be closed. Whilst our young people cannot get jobs we must act to preserve vacancies for them. If we do not then we will see the biggest Brain Drain in British history. This government has forgotten its duty to the British people, which is to look after interests first, genuine asylum seekers excepted, it is totally an utterly immoral to allow inward migration from non-EU countries.
Lower population
[info]casadocaralho wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC)
Britain would be a more pleasant isle if it were less crowded, not least because the pressure to cover the remaining fields, woods and heaths with plastic mock-tudor "Executive" homes would be lower.

Surely it would be better to continue letting in a fair few immigrants - they're the one with real skills and a work ethos - but encourage all the native criminology and sociology graduates to emigrate.
Re: Time to shut and bolt the door
[info]ziva10 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:30 am (UTC)
I wonder why non-EU in particular!?
Re: Time to shut and bolt the door
[info]rickraider wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 09:17 am (UTC)
Non-EU in particular because we cannot legally prevent EU citizens from migrating here
Graduate worry
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:59 am (UTC)
Am I the only person worried that Graduates can only get work by going abroad?

These days employers only want people with work experience and don't want to train anyone, then complain that they can't find anyone to do the work. If they don't start training the next generation of workers they may soon find that the graduates that went abroad to learn a tradde do not want to return to work for them.
Tier 1 immigrants are exactly the ones needed
[info]fionaland wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 01:48 pm (UTC)
As a professional graduate (a vet) with recent experience of the US immigration system, and friends employed in the UK and around the world, i'd like to express my disappointment at Phil Woolas' plans.

The US immigration system is in such a mess that despite the pet care industry's continued growth in the current climate, a national shortage of vets and a qualification that is both highly academic and practically skilled, it is nigh on impossible to enter the country - marriage or illegal immigration are the fastest routes - hardly an example to be followed.

New Zealand and Australia are well known for strong immigration policies, that let 'the right people' in to boost the economy or fill shortages. The UK Tier 1 seemed to have finally got it right on a similar principle - the points are awarded for having high level qualifications (a bachelors gives the minimum points, with masters, phds and MBAs more highly scored), english speaking ability, ability to support yourself financially and previously high salary.

We should be welcoming the highly skilled, well paid people who are so enthusiastic to come here - to be blunt, not exactly the same folk you attract by advertising at the local job centre. To tighten this part of the system is culturally and economically narrow minded, and a reactionist policy that certainly won't help us out of the recession.
Punishing highly skilled foreigners misses the point entirely
[info]kalik2 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 12:58 pm (UTC)
Why is it that although the hue and cry over foreigners taking British jobs is usually about EU workers in specific UK industries, the government's response is always to tighten the restrictions against non-EU highly skilled migrants? Not only is this kind of policy reform completely misdirected, it also reflects an underlying - and unfortunately increasing - post-colonial xenophobia among policymakers and in British society. As a native English-speaking migrant, with a doctorate from a top British university, who is active in the community and has always been gainfully employed, I deeply resent that my convoluted and expensive points-based HSMP application was initially rejected for fatuous, trivial reasons, such as "your former employer's letter does not contain the word 'wage slip'" (even though the letter verified everything required on the application form). I was fortunate enough to have the support of a reasonable MP and plenty of British friends, but from the way immigration issues are reported in the media and from the terms of the public debate on immigration it's clear that people are very confused at best, or else ignorant and bigoted. By all means, British people should compete at least on equal terms with foreign workers, but punishing the highly skilled foreigners who qualify for jobs where there aren't enough qualified British workers misses the point entirely.
Punishing highly skilled foreigners as distinct from highly paid racketeers
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 02:43 pm (UTC)
Ahh! Y'see you went about it the wrong way.
Ever since the children's milk snatcher (effectively) privatised immigration as a business

[we hear about it from time time as some bloke overstepping the line by demanding a personal payment of sex or money - but notably, none of them get prosecuted in case they spill the beans]

'the way' has been to pay a package deals racketeer. That 'way' for a few thou, you get not only entry, but an NI number (probably stolen within the DWP, but so what) a British passport, social housing, social security for yourself and umpteen wives, et cetera.
Re: Punishing highly skilled foreigners as distinct from highly paid racketeers
[info]ziva10 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:13 am (UTC)
cronyblatcher I'd love to know what you're basing your comments on - personal experience, you're many years studying immigration at university? ... I doubt it. The Daily Mail ... I expect so!
Blame Game
[info]tvam wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 02:52 pm (UTC)
How disappointing it is to live in a community that asks you not to order a black coffee when things are going well, but points the finger of blame towards "johnny foreigner" at the first sniff of an opportunity.

Should we make plans to deal with our internal benefit cheats, the work shy or criminal elements? No, let's pick on the intelligent, hard working, industrius individuals that have the medium term potential to drag our obese backsides out of this predicament.
"our internal benefit cheats, the work shy..."
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 03:21 pm (UTC)
... not forgetting the zillions of corporate welfare doled out to the organised economic crime syndicate that is 'the City'
Is the EU All Its Cracked Up To Be?
[info]anonsource wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 05:36 pm (UTC)
I find this story laughable. Britain is the only Western European nation which has admitted EU residents without restrictions - and failed to address the consequences. France, on the other hand, has protected its labor force by opting out of "free migration" for 15 Slavic states - which belong in their own Eastern EU. But it is Britain's tunnel vision of addressing only EU immigration which is most notable; eventually Britain will become more insular, bigoted, and self serving because it can't make policies about specialists from seven continents. Strangly, Britain refused the Euro but hasn't refused the EU. Possibly when it's bankrupt it might do that. In the meantime, repatriation of immigrants of the past hundred years ought to be the first step to establishing protectionism for its own people.
Don't be afraid of a little hardwork
[info]ziva10 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:58 pm (UTC)
As a student graduating in Business this year I have to say I am quite happy to compete with migrant workers seeking jobs.

On the basis that I am a hard worker & will be committed to my job I do not feel in the slightest bit threatened by migrant workers. Afterall EU law states migrant workers have to be paid the same, therefore business' will hire the more productive employee. Due to the many years of comfortable living it seems people these days often expect to be handed everything without having to work for it & I believe this is the real problem.

Also please note the students quoted above have gained qualifications which are not always practical & are aimed at obtaining jobs which are not really prolific, this I suspect is the real reason behind their future employment troubles.
A degree isn't a skill!
[info]hodgeey wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC)
We need less graduates and more technicians and engineers.

Also, teaching our young reading, writing and arithmetic would be useful.
Re: A degree isn't a skill!
[info]ziva10 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 01:50 am (UTC)
Actually during a recession we need more economists, ie. people who have a wide understanding of the economy due to studying a degree in this subject.
Re: A degree isn't a skill!
[info]capler wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
we have got degree holders working in banks who messed up the whole system. i blame those so called intelligent bank bosses who holds degrees but no idea of how to run economy. 'white collars' are complete failure against real hard workers without degrees.
Highly skilled migrants don't compete with British graduates for the same jobs
[info]kalik2 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC)
To add another point against Phil Woolas' flawed reasoning: Under the new Tier 1 scheme (which replaced the HSMP visa), foreigners qualify only if they possess the "right" combination of the "right" age, a recognised university degree, sufficient English language, UK work or educational experience, enough maintenance funds, and a previous minumum salary of £16,000 per year. In practice, this means that only those with higher degrees and salaries (the categories that carry the most points) can actually gain entry to the UK. So they are hardly likely to compete with recent British graduates for the same types of jobs...
British jobs for British Workers/Graduates???
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 08:22 am (UTC)
Another headline grabbing announcement that has no chance of success. Brown continues to deceive the British public. He knows full well he cannot change EU employment laws. He is playing for time and wants to sideline the hopeless sense of frustration sweeping the country. Brown will do anything, say anything to remain in power.

How long before there are riots in the streets????
Already on HSMP
[info]goodwisher2009 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:02 pm (UTC)
Government should consider about HSMP holders as well. There are a lot of HSMP holders who have considered UK as a country for settlement. These people have already invested what they have earned over the years in house, shop,office,cars etc.. It will be real nightmare if these people are told that they can nolonger get an extension. They can not sell their property due to market down turn so all capital they have invested will be confiscated by banks. This will inturn hurt the Banks. The Government should not be so selfish that they first of all call people to come to there country and when people come and settle down they are being told to go back. So i think this argument should be thught about, as this might leave a patch on UKs high esteem. If HSMP holders are finally asked to leave the country due to un qalification on harsh rules think about people who will be left with nothing as in cash wise.
Re: Already on HSMP
[info]kelly6271 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:18 pm (UTC)
i wonder what would be left of britian if all foriegn entites left the country. how would they finance the shortfall in state pensions from contributions made by foreign nationals. how would the government finance its benefit system. who would fill in all the skilled positions in the companies that would be left behind. which companies would the governmet tax to meet its budget requirments considering that majority of the companies in the UK are foriegn owned. I wonder what would also happen if other countries started eviciting britsh workers considering that the biggest britsh companies get their revenue from other countire ( british petrloeum and royal dutch shell). its sought of like the premiership, talented footballers have come into the league and improved the starndard of play and has increase the value of the premiership. who woul watch the premiership if without player like Fabregas, Robhino, Drogba, Henry, Tevez, bergkamp,Torres,Anelka. CMON britian.
British jobs for British graduates
[info]brian_bach7 wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 08:56 am (UTC)
The consequences of taking such a decision would definitely have a negative impact on the UK . All said, immigration checks may be tighter and stricter but there should be opportunities for skilled persons to work anywhere in the world. Afterall, how many companies in the Uk can fill all the vacancies with only Brits. You people need to wake up and stop supporting people who are not ready to work or educate themselves. You cannot sit at home and expect tax from foriegn workers to feed your drink habbits and maintain you while you sit at home. Also for reference sake, check how much comes into the British economy from foreign students who are ready to work and study at the same time. It's time to wake your lazy youths up from you sleep....
Physiotherapist qualifiedin India, HSMP in U.K working as Techical Instructor
[info]ruchirapatel wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:27 pm (UTC)
I am a qualified physiotherapist from India I came to U.K in 2005. I got my state registraton soon after I came here but was unable to get any physio job as I had no U.K experience, Then I got HSMP visa in 2007on my previous experience of Physio in India. I am recently working as Physiotherapy Technical instructor in NHS since October 2008. Now when I have got UK experince I wont be shortlisted for any Junior jobs because of this new law. I am also due fro my extension in September. what do I do, after four and half year of struggle to maintian my skills and find work to survive as Physo in this country, do I go back to India and do what? as there is no survival for physio and these was the only reason for me to come to this country, Atlest graduates from here are lucky as they dont have to go through a real hard work of visa processing and ohter issues as Indian Physio have to if they want to go to U.S , Newzealand, Canada or even Australia. Why doesnt this law have any exceptions of peole who are already working at some level to pogress or people who are in this country already, Cant there be any exceptions or is this a common criteria for all overseas workers.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date