UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 14°C / Lo 9°C

Operation Sarah: How the PM's wife is rebranding herself

Editing the News of the World's magazine, marching at Gay Pride, tweeting at G8 – Sarah Brown is running a public relations campaign. So who is she targeting? And what is she hoping to achieve? Ian Burrell studies her strategy

Sarah Brown's recent media drive has helped to raise her status to a different level entirely

Sarah Brown's recent media drive has helped to raise her status to a different level entirely

When Gordon Brown sat down at a press conference at the G8 summit in Italy last week and solemnly pronounced that allegations of phone-hacking by The News of the World constituted a "very serious" matter, he may not have given much thought as to who exactly will be editing that newspaper's magazine, Fabulous, this weekend.

But as his cabinet colleagues still seek to make political capital out of the row, and as angry MPs summon executives from the paper's parent company to come before them and answer questions, Mr Brown's wife, Sarah, is eagerly anticipating the publication of her own journalistic efforts in that very same title.

Last Sunday, with Labour hoping that the claims could yet undermine David Cameron by shaming his Tory communications chief Andy Coulson, The News of the World did not pass up the opportunity to celebrate its connections with Number 10. The paper's editor, Colin Myler, said he felt "proud and privileged" to have Brown edit the newpsaper's magazine. "She devoted a great deal of time to editing this unique issue, interviewing cover star Jools Oliver, wife of TV chef Jamie, about her fertility experiences," he said. "She came into the office and co-ordinated features, including one about five inspiring women who had babies... as well as Dr Hilary Jones's guide to tackling a host of women's health problems."

Sarah Brown crops up in an awful lot of places these days. The previous weekend she had been on the Gay Pride march in London, striding forth alongside gay MEP Michael Cashman and waving a pink Union flag. She was photographed at the Glastonbury festival last month, donning Water Aid charity wellies and sharing a polka dot umbrella with Naomi Campbell, having previously joined the supermodel and the socialite Paris Hilton for dinner at the African Ladies Health Summit in Los Angeles.

And, of course, during last week she was at her husband's side in Italy, where she kept everyone up to date with a blog, "Sarah Brown at the G8", posted on Downing Street's website, Number10.gov.uk.

"Up at the crack of dawn to set off for the G8 in Italy!" she began. "There's a busy few days ahead for me as part of the spouses programme while Gordon is at the summit. But I'm really looking forward to meeting up with the 'other halves' – some of them I have met before from last year's G8 and the G20 in London."

The next day she posted up a picture from the Vatican, captioned "Meeting His Holiness the Pope", before visiting the earthquake-torn town of L'Aquila, then heading off for an Italian cultural tour where for lunch she had "green pea (yes, green!) ice-cream as a starter".

Much of the online traffic to this blog will have come via Mrs Brown's personal Twitter feed, "SarahBrown10", the real time social networking site on which she has built an extraordinary following of nearly 380,000, and from where she encourages engagement with good causes such as Million Mums, a charity she helped to launch to combat deaths in childbirth.

On Twitter, Sarah is commended by followers for her refusal to eat veal at the G8, and she posts a Twitpic of herself in a black veil, solemnly shaking hands with the Pope and captioned "At the Vatican". Nearly all the responses, including one that observes "You look very devout and suitably angelic", are positive.

Sarah Brown is not a natural extrovert but she is a public relations professional, and it shows. She was a co-founder of the "ethical PR" specialist firm Hobsbawm Macaulay, before being hired to work in the arts division of Alan Parker's international Brunswick empire.

At Brunswick she worked with David Yelland, a partner in the financial PR company and a former editor of The Sun. For years Brown has been compared with the out-going – and oft-maligned – Cherie Blair and portrayed as a relatively retiring figure, but Yelland has been impressed by the way his friend has taken charge of raising her own profile.

"I think the treatment meted out to Cherie Blair, especially towards the end of Tony's time, was unfair, sexist and just nasty frankly. Sarah has tackled it by just being Sarah," he says, before praising her use of new media as a direct line of communication.

"She knows that, as with Cherie, the media might be difficult, so she has gone around it using Twitter. She's out-Twittered her enemies and connected with people in a way that shows the real Sarah. If Gordon could find a way to do that we might be in a different ballgame.

"Sarah has become the other half of Gordon in a profound way. She feels a great injustice is being done to one of the cleverest and most moral of Prime Ministers we have had since the war."

So what is Sarah Brown's strategy? Does she even have one? Danny Rogers, editor of the industry magazine PR Week, describes the Downing Street's first lady's media onslaught as "a bit scattergun".

"She's trying a bit of everything: Twitter, photos with famous people, meetings with powerful women from around the world. One moment she's pictured with Paris Hilton and the next she's giving tips on cooking," he says, referring to the revelation that Sarah has been charming Gordon's cabinet colleagues with her pasta, the so-called "Lasagne Offensive".

"There doesn't seem like a definite theme – it's like she's raising her profile across the board," says Rogers.

"She's an asset for Gordon, but the question is how to focus on specific themes, and at the moment that strategy is not emerging."

The role of the partner of a political leader has grown immeasurably in recent years. There was never much media interest in Audrey, the wife of James Callaghan (the last Labour Prime Minister before Tony Blair), in spite of her admirable campaigning on children's health issues. Cherie has changed the game, as has a greater awareness of the impact on US politics of First Ladies from Hillary Clinton to the glamorous and stylish Michelle Obama – in the company of whom Sarah Brown was photographed during the tour of damaged buildings in L'Aquila.

One publicist said Brown needed to be careful not to be drawn into a fashion parade in front of the cameras. "She's not competing in the beauty stakes, or trying to play the fashion game - she's not Carla Bruni-Sarkozy or Michelle Obama. But she does have some sort of resonance with Middle England."

The consistent thread that has run though Sarah Brown's recent media blitz has been women's health. This weekend's edition of Fabulous is themed on that same issue and is linked to the charity Wellbeing of Women, of which Ms Brown is patron. "I wanted to reach women and encourage them to take care of their own wellbeing, always to seek early medical help for any concerns and to get all the regular checks," she said in a prepared statement. "This special issue of Fabulous is for every woman in Britain. Hopefully it will help them to a healthier future."

Alan Edwards, CEO of The Outside Organisation, which represents stars such as David Bowie and Naomi Campbell, helped to organise the photo-opportunity at Glastonbury, which once again had the added benefit of promoting women's health.

"They met through Naomi's charity catwalk show, Fashion for Relief, which partnered with The White Ribbon Alliance (WRA), which is a fantastic coalition of on-the-ground organisations dedicated to reducing maternal mortality in developing countries," he says.

"As a result of the work of Sarah and Naomi in the past year, global membership of the WRA has more than tripled. We're more than happy to help do what we can to help build awareness for such a good cause."

Sarah Brown can seek high-level advice from other sources, too, from Simon Lewis, the former Vodafone communications chief who has just joined Downing Street, to Richard Wallace, editor of the Daily Mirror, and the ever-intuitive Peter Mandelson. It is widely known in the PR industry that she is no longer so close to Julia Hobsbawm, her former PR partner, who has since built a successful business, Editorial Intelligence, which analyses the output of key media commentators.

According to Colin Byrne, CEO of the major PR consultancy Weber Shandwick and a former chief press officer for the Labour Party, Brown is largely relying on her own judgement. "Yes, she's a seasoned PR professional, but I don't think this is at all conventional PR. I think this is just part of her natural warmth and charm. I think she is trusting her instincts."

Because a lot of her profile-raising activity is taking place online, there is a limit to how much learning she can take on board from her old PR contacts anyway, as Danny Rogers points out.

"The really interesting areas are the Twitter and new media strategy. It's all very well going to drinks parties with Rebekah Wade (the chief executive of News International, whose wedding party Sarah Brown recently attended), but it's difficult when you are trying to engage with a mass audience like Twitter and Facebook, where the rules are less clear and the backlash is potentially more savage. Twitter is pretty much uncharted territory."

The publicist Mark Borkowski, a prolific user of new media, believes that Sarah Brown has shown herself far more adept in this area than her husband could ever hope to be. "She is operating in areas where he doesn't have any hope of generating traction," he says. "He cannot YouTube, she can. He cannot Twitter, she can. Gordon can't generate sympathetic votes, she can, particularly from women. They're trying to turn her into a yin to his yang."

Borkowski traces the origins of Sarah Brown's strategy back to last year's Labour Party conference in Manchester, when she stepped up to the microphone in defence of her under-attack husband. "Some people at the time claimed she needed to be arm-twisted into that but actually it was a bit of a toe in the water to see how it would go."

Despite her PR background, it will not have been easy for her. She once said of the Hobsbawm Macaulay way of working: "Julia goes out to lunch with people so I don't have to." One industry source recalls that "She never really hung out with the PR crowd."

The media commentator and author, Peter York, who has known her since her days in PR, says that she is not extrovert but is none the less a more effective communicator than her husband. "She's not a person who instinctively likes putting herself forward, but she realises she has to. She's obviously Gordon's greatest humanising advantage – she can talk human," he says. "And as a PR she did operate in quasi-political areas. Hobsbawm Macaulay didn't sell face cream. They were selling the New Statesman and ideas, doing ethical PR. So she knows what she's doing."

The most important question, of course, is whether all this activity will be effective. According to one senior PR professional, it won't. "It's completely irrelevant. She can project as much as she wants and be seen in the company of Michelle Obama, but she does not run the country, the economy or the Labour party," he says. "I don't think this will make 0.01 per cent of difference to Labour's ratings in the opinion polls. She's doing her bit to support her beleaguered husband, who lacks a lot of the personality traits she has. But it's completely irrelevant to the big picture, which is Gordon Brown versus David Cameron."

Gary Farrow, CEO of The Corporation, the publicists for big entertainment stars such as Elton John and Jeremy Clarkson, is rather less sympathetic. "It's desperation of the highest form, anything for a photo-opportunity, and strategy doesn't come into it," he says. "Come June, the strategy is going to be based around the Job Centre."

One figure, who knows Sarah Brown well, believes she is simply being pragmatic and attempting to use the platform she currently has to raise awareness of the things that matter most to her. "Hobsbawm Macaulay had their niche, a soft feminist, soft arts stance combined with charity work and fundraising. I think Sarah has the view that she will use her brief time at Number 10 to do that stuff. She's approaching it in exactly the same way as the Prime Minister himself, which is to say: 'I've got a year, let's make the most of it' – and then dust off the CV."

If Sarah Brown does find herself having to move house next summer, it's unlikely that her CV will be wending its way to the inboxes of the big PR consultancies. Her recent media drive has helped to raise her status to a different level entirely. "I think she will do stuff in the voluntary sector, chairing a charity," says one observer. "I don't think she would go back into commercial PR. That would be a bit grubby after all that she's done."

Tweets from Downing Street

http://twitpic.com/afa9z Trying to post my 'Editor At Work' shot up for my new profile pic, but it is too big! Off to get a smaller one.

about 3 hours ago from TwitPic

Am hoping that no veal served at lunch again today – have declined it twice this trip as just feel very strongly about it

7:19 AM Jul 10th from web

Very inspired by everyone at the Fabian Women's evening this evening – what an energetic bunch determined to do some good in the world

about 23 hours ago from TweetDeck

Exit strategies: What could Mrs Brown do next?

Be a poet

Back in 1970, there were three living poets whose works had broken into the mass market. They were Marc Bolan, Bob Dylan, and Mary Wilson (above, with her husband). The hardback edition of Mrs Wilson's 'Selected Poems' sold 75,000 copies, at 12 shillings each. "If I can write, before I die/One line of purest poetry...Then I shall not have lived in vain," she wrote. Some might say that, sadly, she lived in vain.

Take it easy

Drink gin, play golf, and never speak to journalists. It worked for Denis Thatcher, but then he had made a pile of money and could retire in 1975, the year that the woman he called 'The Boss' became Leader of the Conservative Party.

Write a book

A factual book related in some way to the unique experience of being married to a Prime Minister will sell just on the strength of the name on the cover. Original research is optional. On Amazon, a copy of 'Chequers: The Prime Minister's Country House and Its History', signed by the author, Norma Major, costs £74.95 plus postage.

Run for office

If it had not been for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton might now be back in the White House, where she was 'First Lady' for eight years, and Bill might be America's first ever 'First Gentleman'. But in British politics, it could be a tougher assignment, trying to find a constituency party in a safe seat that is prepared to select the wife of the Prime Minister as their candidate.

Go on a lecture tour

Cherie Blair did not wait for Tony to leave Downing Street before she was making serious money to help pay off the £3m mortgage on their home in Connaught Square. The New York based Harry Walker agency sent out a breathless email to clients in August 2004 with the "exciting" news that "Cherie Blair, noted British attorney, human rights advocate and the wife of Prime Minister Tony Blair" was on offer as a speaker, for a fee that reputedly have varied between £25,000 and £160,000. Other lucrative appearances followed.

Andy Mcsmith

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Forget it Sarah.
[info]simoncochrane wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 12:23 am (UTC)


Whatever Sarah Brown's reasons are for courting such tired and cheesey limelight, they reek of absolute desperation.

She's either just having a damned good time being herself, despite Gordon. Or she's desperately trying to boost his image as a human being, despite the fact that he's anything but.

Let's hope it's the former of the two, and that she's at last realised that she's married a moral and ethical millstone, and has decided to show that she's the polar opposite of 'him-indoors'.

But she's wasting her time on either count, because the ineviatable question arises.....

Why did such a supposedly intelligent woman marry such an arrogant, egotistical, disgrace-to-humanity as 'him-in-doors' in the first place?

If Sarah wants to maintain any personal credibility at all, she needs to drop Everything-Gordon immediately. If she doesn't she's in trouble; because when Gordon goes in absolute disgrace, which he will, she'll go the same way too.

When Your Husband Is About To Lose His Job
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC)
most wives will do anything to help their husbands. Sarah, he's a lost cause.
Re: When Your Husband Is About To Lose His Job
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:53 am (UTC)
The Italiana press were severe with her at the G8. Badly dressed, and turns up her nose at veal (a great delicacy in Italy). Can she not enjoy life instead of having all these principles?
Will the real Sarah please stand up? Just PR!
[info]elevengoalposts wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 03:27 am (UTC)
It's one thing to turn up at or get involved in "touchy-feely" events, where the occasion is happy and positive.
But we don't see too many pictures or videos of her or Labour ministers appearing at the repatriation events or on other "difficult" stages.
She is a PR person, through and through so, as with politicians, one cannot take these public performances as sincere expressions of any true feelings.
In fact, does anyone seriously take any utterances by public figures as reflecting their real thoughts on anything? So why do people get reported as being impressed by their (ever
so) faux charm and concern? Surely they're not carefully "selected" in some way?
The problem for this lady is that, whether we like the current emphasis on appearance or not, she does not present particularly well physically, especially compared with the wives of other national leaders.
The No 10 PR machine is bursting its boilers, working round the clock, to get her massive coverage, to offset the negative impact of Gordon, but the impact on women and men is not very positive. She's had plenty of time to "come out" over the years, but chose to be in the background, so this media blitz is seen, quite correctly, as a cynical exercise.
Shame she marred a muppet
[info]repton4 wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:12 am (UTC)
Shame she marred a muppet, Gordon Brown is a coward he has got our soldiers killed because of lack of equipment he is the biggest liar and cheat i have ever came across, the man has no respect for the British people or the British way of life, The man has ruined this country,
[info]ptstroud wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:16 am (UTC)
"Sarah has become the other half of Gordon in a profound way. She feels a great injustice is being done to one of the cleverest and most moral of Prime Ministers we have had since the war." Mr Yelland has one hell of a sense of humour!

As to the article, simoncochrane at 12:23 says it all.
[info]gyhrphy wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:20 am (UTC)
Plug the woman all you like, her husband is detested, so she can't and won't make a difference.
Unfit and Unsuited
[info]neil639 wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:46 am (UTC)
However Mrs Brown wishes to portray herself, it is totally irrelevant to the fact that the weird individual she is married to is unfit and unsuited to any kind of high office.
Political wife
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:51 am (UTC)
Brown only married this woman for PR reasons anyway. He's a natural loner, and the Blair government had been in power for a long time before he allowed himself to become convinced that, for the sake of his own career, it would be politically expedient to have a wife in tow, and children. I don't think there's much more than that in their relationship.
Sarah Brown.
[info]jstorm_3 wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 07:54 am (UTC)
She is a PR professional - surely that says it all? Everything she is doing is a calculated attempt to promote herself .. probably to help her career prospects next year. It was pointed out that normally any dietary preferences are mentioned in advance of conferences .. not paraded loudly and constantly while they are in progress. Glastonbury, Gay Pride etc. .. it is all an insult to the intelligence of the electorate. Although if hundreds of people are writing 'positive' comments on her Twitter perhaps she hasn't underestimated us after all. Sad.
Don't bother Madam - your husband has cut his throat by
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 08:06 am (UTC)
supporting the campaign, by a rat-brained menace to world peace, to become President of the Union.
Re: Don't bother Madam - your husband has cut his throat by
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 08:12 am (UTC)
Why do political males always feel they have to appear clutching a woman? Does Angela Merkel appear clutching a husband? What would HABS (husbands and boyfriends) do on the spouses' tour of the city? What about gay prime ministers? Should they bring along their bf/gfs?

When is this "spouses" nonsense going to stop?
Wonky balance Andy.
[info]michaelyoung wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Awful lot of comments from friends and others with vested interests in presenting a positive picture, before getting to the more balanced views and insightful opinion. I'd almost given up reading by then. Still an interesting if superficial window on PR in 2009.
Deluded
[info]roland500 wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
""" She feels a great injustice is being done to one of the cleverest and most moral of Prime Ministers we have had since the war."""

She cannot be serious. This man is just plain stupid - and a bully at that. And as for morality. He has plundered the Exchequer to over-reward himself and all the other third rate thieves at Westminster. Look what this idiot has done for pensions and not done for pensioners in general and also Occupational Pensioners sufferers and Equitable Life victims. Fairness is not in this man's DNA. But cowardice is. And all his sins will come to the surface when he is kicked out of Downing Street.

So delusion is catching. Don't go near those in No: 10.

Roland
The Truth about Sarah 'Brown'
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 08:21 am (UTC)
Paedophilia is rife amongst political leaders. No more so than in London.

For example, Tony Blair, the European President hopeful, has a conviction for importuning in public toilets that goes back to 1983. At Bow Street Magistrates Court, he pleaded guilty (under the name Charles Linton) and was fined GBP 50.00.

Gordon Brown spent much of his early years openly practising an "enthusiasm" for under-aged boys.

He was married -- unusually late in life for someone who, due to his political rise and life in London, must have had untold opportunities to meet the opposite sex -- to a woman who was paid GBP 140,000 to act as his fiance because it was politically expedient for Brown to have a wife, due to him being in-line to succeed sweet Tony ... the Messiah.

She was then paid GBP 50,000 per year for each year she remained his fiance.

The money came out of the so-called "Black Widows Fund" which was also used to set up "New Labour" between 1992 and 1994. A posse of potential New Labour politicians (including Bryan Gould and Peter Mandelson) flew over to the USA to be instructed on what to put into New Labour's manifesto, by Bill Clinton's campaign advisers. Bill Clinton had campaigned on a "New Covenant" idea, aping Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, described in the New Testament.

The Black Widows fund was originally set up with the money Robert Maxwell stole from his employee's pension funds. Maxwell was murdered, he did not commit suicide. He knew too much.

All shocking stuff, and most of you are going to smirk and reject it all out of hand. Nevertheless, those who are prepared to persist will be rewarded. There are few, if any, rational explanations for the rise, strategies, and behaviour of New Labour. In which case, the reader is forced to accept that only counter-intuitive explanations could ever make sense of their history, especially when they are rooted in fact.

Clearly, Britain is no longer what most people still assume it to be.
Re: The Truth about Sarah 'Brown'
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 08:42 am (UTC)
er, it's "Anthony Charles Linton Blair" with an i.

Even if it's true, paedophilia is the least of Bliar's crimes.

All the rest of your post is probably correct. Thanks for the detail.
Re: The Truth about Sarah 'Brown'
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 09:26 am (UTC)
Thanks for the spelling correction Tom. Appreciate your comment, and I also do agree with your 2nd line.
Re: The Truth about Sarah 'Brown'
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
Interesting. Was there any bonus for having children? That really beats the casino operators masquerading as bankers, Gordon Brown's inner circle of friends
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 09:42 am (UTC)
One of the cleverest and most moral of Prime Ministers? Who's that then?
I wouldn't prostitute myself for the Labour party...
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
..but then again, in comparison to Sarah's elitist needs, mine are somewhat modest.
Desperate Show-off
[info]mikegooding wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
She could have discreetly let the G8 organisers know beforehand that she wouldn't eat veal, as does the First Lady of this country (no, not Cherie Blair/Booth). Instead she chose to make a public fuss and embarrass the hosts. Well done.
Brown shot himself in the foot
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
Last Sunday, with Labour hoping that the claims could yet undermine David Cameron by shaming his Tory communications chief Andy Coulson, The News of the World did not pass up the opportunity to celebrate its connections with Number 10. The paper's editor, Colin Myler, said he felt "proud and privileged" to have Brown edit the newpsaper's magazine.


Once again, Gordon Brown shot himself in the foot big time, with the help of such as Mandy, Prescott, the Guardian and the BBC, it makes you wonder. But never mind, Sarah would soon be appointed to the Lords and made the 3rd unelected Prime Minister. Are we a lucky to get so many PMs.
Re-branding of Sarah Brown
[info]sarah_wiltshire wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 12:43 pm (UTC)
Sorry, I don't like this woman. This came about from the time she took the podium at last year's conference and said something like - ....... "I give you your Prime Minister, my husband". Yuk! It was all so false and of course the next day the press was full-on Sarah. She has now tried to become a dolly bird when, sorry, she doesn't have the figure and is now getting on in years. I don't want to sound bitchy but I do think she is desperation personnified and her husband will use her for his own means. I hope it is goodbye to both and a lesson to Mrs Cameron on how not to behave - twittering or otherwise!
Well done Sarah
[info]royperestrelo wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 01:33 pm (UTC)
Ok her husband has had a tough time as of late and some of his decisions have really fallen foul in the UK but you can not blame her for using her position for some good. By her lifting her media image she will be able to do more of her charity work and benefit those she supports more.

I say its a good thing, media can be a good and bad thing and if she is using it to benefit herself and also organisations she supports and as an offshoot humanise her husband as well I do not see a problem at all.

As long as she does not end up polorising it just for her own means, there is nothing wrong with her skimming a bit of the limelight. Go for it.
Sarah Brown
[info]buckpool wrote:
Thursday, 16 July 2009 at 01:59 pm (UTC)
Networking are we dear?
Sarah Brown
[info]prestonian wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 01:27 am (UTC)
Ethical PR? Oxymoron! Sarah Brown is at risk of ending up as CherieMk2. It is so obvious that this new prominence is all about trying to improve Gordon's image. Some clients are just too difficult to promote, Sarah!
Is anyone in the government elected?
[info]drlizmiller wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 11:07 am (UTC)
Yet another powerful political influence with no mandate from the electorate - what kind of nepotistic, totalitarian state do we now inhabit?

Once upon time, we had an internationally respected democracy that was complemented by powerful and honorable institutions. Now we are such a joke, the Iranians can have a pop at us and be vindicated.

EDITOR'S CHOICE

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date