Referendum plan for big council tax rises
Friday 30 July 2010
Latest in UK Politics
Related articles
On Facebook
From the blogs
Disclosure: We’d never even been to a club when we made our first single
For most of us, reaching eighteen years of age opens up a new world for exploration, spontaneity and...
Top of the posts: Drunken rants, the Western Fail and misogyny pushers
The most read blogs this week, as determined by stats.
Sepp Blatter: Penalty shoot-outs must remain, they’re football’s great leveller
As England supporters, we should scorn at any such deciding factor within football. On so many occas...
Why do some men consider the street as a female meat market?
Pronouncements on sexual inequality in the UK are normally met with an eye roll by my generation. As...
The public will be given the power to veto excessive council tax rises, the Government said today.
Under plans announced by Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles, local people will have the right to decide whether to allow increases above a set ceiling, by holding referendums.
Any council that set its increase above the ceiling, approved by Parliament each year, would trigger an automatic referendum of all registered electors in its area.
Residents would be asked to choose between the proposed rise and a "shadow budget", which the council must also prepare within the defined limit. A no vote would leave councils having to refund taxpayers or give a credit at the end of the tax year.
Council tax bills across England have doubled since 1997, pushing the average bill to £120 a month on a Band D home, the Department for Communities and Local Government said.
The unaccountable police authority levy imposed on council tax has trebled since 1997, it added.
The new system would replace capping by Whitehall.
Mr Pickles said: "Hardworking families and pensioners were left feeling powerless and frustrated under the previous government, as council tax bills doubled while their frontline services like weekly bin collections were halved.
"If councils want to increase council tax further, they will have to prove the case to the electorate. Let the people decide.
"The new Government is committed to tackling the fiddled funding which drove up council tax, but such reforms must go hand in hand with measures to protect the interests of local taxpayers.
"This is a radical extension of direct democracy, as part of a wider programme of decentralising power to local communities. Power should not just be given to councils, but be devolved further down to neighbourhoods and citizens."
The previous government stepped in to take capping action against 36 authorities which set excessive rises, the department said.
Some of the highest rises were South Cambridgeshire, which tried to set a 100% increase in 2005/06, and Lincolnshire Police Authority a 79% increase in 2008/09.
Council tax bills hit £1,439 on Band D in England in 2010/11.
By contrast, it was £688 in 1997/98.
This means council tax in this period has risen 109% - or an extra £751 a year on a Band D home.
Since all other bands are set as a percentage of Band D, every type of home has seen their bill double.
The average police precept on council tax in England has trebled from £54 on Band D in 1997/98 to £161 in 2010/11.
Westminster Council, which sets the second lowest council tax in the country, welcomed the move.
Council leader Colin Barrow said: "It is often said that the public is in favour of more spending. It is quite another thing to make the case for higher taxes.
"This measure is an important step towards a grown-up debate about the size of the public sector."
Shadow communities secretary John Denham said: "Eric Pickles is already making council tax-payers pay over the odds for local services.
"The cut of over £1 billion he has forced on English councils this year means everyone is paying more for lower levels of service than they got last year.
"Labour had already reduced council tax increases to their lowest ever levels and it is years since any council needed to be capped.
"His referendum is claiming to solve a problem that need not exist."
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Osborne adviser leaked budget information to Murdoch's man
- 3 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 4 Schoolboy spiked brownies with cannabis in cookery class
- 5 News in pictures
- 6 Britain's waste: Now it's coming back to haunt us
- 7 Lawyers told Hunt to stay out of Sky deal
- 8 In pictures: The bewildering face of China
- 9 UK plans for euro-immigrants surge
- 10 Is Ridley Scott the most macho man in movies?
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Osborne adviser leaked budget information to Murdoch's man
- 3 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 4 Society: The only way is Finland
- 5 Schoolboy spiked brownies with cannabis in cookery class
- 6 Fat? Really? Olympic hope laughs off official’s jibe – but others aren’t amused
- 7 'Hello mum, this is going to be hard for you to read ...'
- 8 African monkey meat that could be behind the next HIV
- 9 Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning
- 10 French in uproar over oral sex anti-smoking posters
Experience the Heineken Hub
Get free wi-fi and exclusive i content while you enjoy a tasty pint of Heineken at participating pubs.
Can you imagine a career in teaching?
Be inspired to teach - let real teachers show you how rewarding the job can be.
Playing a game-changing role during the Games
Cisco is providing the solutions for London 2012's complex IT needs.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Ridley Scott: The most macho man in movies?
Gallic gourmets put France back on culinary map
The outsider: Margaret Howell
For men only: A pilgrimage to Mount Athos
Feeding a hungry world – or meddling with laws of nature?



Comments