Reid attacks judges who hamper 'life and death' terrorism battle
Thursday 10 August 2006
Latest in UK Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
John Reid accused some politicians, judges and liberal commentators of hindering the "life and death" fight with al-Qa'ida as he signalled he was ready to push for new anti-terrorism laws. The Home Secretary said terrorists espousing the same ideology as those active in Iraq and Afghanistan represented the greatest threat to Britain since the Second World War.
And he spelt out his frustration that the nation was using legislation dating back half a century to combat a 21st-century breed of "unconstrained" terrorists driven by a perverse morality.
Mr Reid has overhauled the structure of the Home Office and the immigration services, as well as "rebalanced" the criminal justice system in his first three months in the job. He said yesterday that he wanted to turn to the "overarching challenges" facing Britain as he delivered a bleak assessment of the determination of "fascist individuals" to wreak havoc in this country.
He warned they "can network courtesy of new technology and can access modern chemical, biological and other means of mass destruction and they have therefore unconstrained capability". They were part of the "seamless web" that includes the Middle East, Iraq and Afghanistan. He said: "On this home front, we face the same threat from the same type of terrorists with the same set of values."
Mr Reid said: "We need to understand the depth and magnitude of that threat - all of us, each of us across the whole political, media, judicial and public spectrum."
He criticised some MPs and peers for opposing anti-terror legislation, judges for weighing terrorists' rights over public safety and commentators for giving "more prominence to the views of Islamist terrorists than democratically elected Muslim politicians".
Mr Reid said: "When I see and hear all of these things, then I sometimes feel that so many people who should be foremost in recognising the threat facing us... I can't help feeling they just don't get it. They just don't get it."
The Home Secretary added: "This isn't an abstract discussion - it's a matter of life and death."
He protested that terrorists who could cause "irreparable damage on a hitherto unknown scale" evade prosecution because admissible court evidence cannot be gathered, or avoid deportation because they could be in danger in their home countries.
He was speaking a week after the Court of Appeal said that control orders, which are used to restrain the movements of six terror suspects, violated their human rights. Mr Reid warned: "Sometimes we may have to modify some of our freedoms in the short term in order to prevent their use and abuse by those who oppose our fundamental values and would destroy all of our freedoms in the long term." Speaking in London to the Demos think-tank, he hailed a "step change" in the co-operation between the security services and said at least four major terrorist plots had been broken up since last year's July 7 attacks. Almost 1,000 people had been arrested on terror charges, of whom 154 had been charged and 60 awaited trial. "Yet, in spite of these successes, we remain unable to adapt our institutions and legal orthodoxy as fast as I believe we need to. This is the area that puts us at risk in national security terms."
The Home Secretary also argued that the end of the Cold War and globalisation had brought mass migration "on a hitherto unprecedented scale", with huge potential economic benefits but also the risk of insecurity. He said managing immigration was the greatest challenge facing European governmentsand reiterated his call for a mature discussion on the issue to stop it becoming a political football.
David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, said Mr Reid was right not to underestimate "the grave threat" from terrorism, which was why the Tories had helped implement measures against it. He said the Government should answer Tory calls for a UK border police force and appoint a dedicated minister for counter-terrorism.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments