UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 8° London Hi 8°C / Lo 4°C

Rescue plan to save property market

By Nigel Morris, Sean O'Grady and James Macintyre
Wednesday, 6 August 2008

Alistair Darling is drawing up a series of radical proposals to revive Britain's beleaguered housing market as new figures show soaring numbers of homes being repossessed.

Among the measures being considered by the Chancellor are:

*A plan to reintroduce income support for mortgage interest payments for homeowners who lose their jobs.

*Suspending stamp duty so buyers only pay the tax after several years in their new home, or perhaps not until they sell the property.

*Creating a new, tax-free fund to help first-time buyers raise the deposit they need to get on the housing ladder.

Ministers are also looking at extending schemes to buy empty properties, particularly in city centres, and turn them into social housing. Mr Darling is desperate to have the proposals ready by the time MPs get back from the summer break in order to stave off a backbench rebellion against Gordon Brown. But yesterday he gave a grim warning that the economic downturn is likely to be prolonged. Economists believe the country could be on the brink of recession, with growth almost at a standstill.

Pressed on reports that he planned to offer a stamp duty holiday to house buyers, Mr Darling left open the possibility of stopping the tax altogether for the duration of the current downturn.

But The Independent has learnt that the most likely course of action will be to defer, rather than cancel, the stamp duty charges paid by the majority of home buyers. Officials, who emphasised that no final decisions had been taken, said the idea would have the attraction of providing a filip to the housing market without ultimately depriving the Treasury of the billions of pounds raised from stamp duty.

Ministers are also preparing to announce a new saving scheme aimed at first-time home buyers. It would enable them to put cash into a tax-free fund similar to Individual Savings Accounts to help build the deposit required by most lenders, who are now refusing to offer 100 per cent mortgages because of the credit crunch.

Asked about the stamp duty holiday plan, Mr Darling said: "I am looking at a number of measures and I am not going to be drawn on that today because we have not concluded what exactly we need to do. It is helping people that is important. I want to look at a range of options."

Stamp duty is paid at 1 per cent on homes bought for between £125,001 and £250,000, 3 per cent between £250,001 and £500,000, and 4 per cent for properties bought for more than £500,000. Overall, the levy has brought in £31.5bn over the past 10 years, and has increased rapidly as house prices have risen.

Under another plan being examined at the Treasury, stamp duty would be be levied at its higher rate only on that part of the price above the threshold, rather than triggering the tax on the whole amount. That would also remove the distortions in the market around the threshold levels.

Home financing specialists questioned the effectiveness of altering the stamp duty regime. They said the price paid by a first-time buyer was about £130,000, only just liable for the duty, and further falls in prices would bring more properties out of stamp duty. A more significant barrier to ownership for first-time buyers remains the disappearance of the 100 per cent mortgage.

There are also signs that buyers are waiting for house prices to decline further. Approvals of new mortgages are down 70 per cent on their peak a year ago, according to the Bank of England.

The Financial Services Authority said 9,152 homes were repossessed in the first three months of the year, a rise of 40 per cent on the same period in 2007. It also reported that the number of mortgages three months or more in arrears rose by 15 per cent, to 302,000, in the three month period – 2.5 per cent of Britain's total mortgage loan book.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders has talked to the Government about a return to income support for mortgage interest payments for homeowners who lose their jobs. But supporting mortgage holders would be costly and could put too large a strain on government finances.

Ministers could also strongly encourage the Bank of England to reform its new Special Liquidity Scheme, which would allow banks to swap unmarketable but relatively good quality mortgage-backed securities for government securities. Thus, the state in effect lends the banking system the money to grant mortgages, using older mortgage books as collateral on the loan, albeit at a punitive rate of interest.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

86 Comments

I have long thought the structure of stamp duty is unfair.
A sliding scale would surely be more appropriate instead of lumping properties in such broad bands.
When we were searching for a property a few months ago it was obvious that many people were pricing at 249,000 to avoid the sudden jump to 3%. This artificially distorts pricing and makes no sense.

Posted by Celia Bircumshaw | 07.08.08, 22:49 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I do not believe the Chancellor can save the property market in a sensible and reasonable way. Of course, he can throw taxpayers money at the problem, but at what cost?

In the end, if the Chancellor keeps trying to bail everyone out, there will be no money left to run the public services, or he will have to raise taxes at completely the wrong time, or increase borrowing which is absolutely wrong.

Borrowing any more lands future generations with massive dept, this Government borrowed when times were good and now is floundering.

P. Layton

Posted by P. Layton | 07.08.08, 11:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I do not believe the Chancellor can save the property market in a sensible and reasonable way. Of course, he can throw taxpayers money at the problem, but at what cost?

In the end, if the Chancellor keeps trying to bail everyone out, there will be no money left to run the public services, or he will have to raise taxes at completely the wrong time, or increase borrowing which is absolutely wrong.

Borrowing any more lands future generations with massive dept, this Government borrowed when times were good and now is floundering.

P. Layton

Posted by P. Layton | 07.08.08, 11:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Labour ministers, most of whom have never been able to make a living in the private sector are going to come up with a solution to the present housing crisis?
Brown and these NuLab stooges have taken eleven years to create this mess.

Posted by john | 07.08.08, 01:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Will this cause that horrible Crusty Allgob to start shouting off how she single-handedly got stamp duty abolished, yet she was part of the mechanism that hyperinflated house prices in the first place. When's she going to eat her hat?
Well, this numpty gov't have done it again. Prospective buyers (a rare breed these days) will wait the outcome of this governments foggy decisions and hence the almost dead market will now be completely deceased.
Why does this gov't want to revive a market where prices do not represent building costs and most people can't afford the prices anyway. Totally irresponsible. Let the market find its own value. And why should responsible buyers have to support the chavs who spent more than they could afford.
Anyway, we're borrowed to the limit, and the amount of money required to fulfill all this junk would be of biblical proportions. Just more NuLabour false promises (except they've managed to kill the market stone dead). More socialist meddling.

Posted by Np | 06.08.08, 20:50 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Everybody should be held accountable for their own actions.

The (few) people that are posting comments trying to make out it is greedy or selfish for the majority of people to want house prices to fall would do well to remember this.

If you bought a house recently then you have - perhaps unwittingly - helped compound the problem of high house prices.

The fact that you are now struggling to meet your mortgage payments is your own responsibility.

I've lost count of the number of stories I've heard of people using mortgage equity withdrawal to buy a new car or an expensive holiday. Now that the money's all been spent and enjoyed you expect the taxpayer to help pay your mortgage?
Ridiculous!

If anything your own actions have more to do with greed and selfishness than any of the posters on here cheering on the falling house prices.

Posted by Dean Oldham | 06.08.08, 20:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

no

Posted by staff | 06.08.08, 18:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

With the economic down turn, many small businesses are struggling too and when a shop becomes empty, the full business rates have to be paid after the first three months and so many shop keepers have the added worry of this. This new law came into effect from April 2008 and wasn't well thought out considering that the recession had already started.

I

Posted by Pam | 06.08.08, 18:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Brown and Darling are desperate to try anything which will stop the long overdue and welcome correction in house prices. Bear in mind however that when the bubble has well and truly burst, the 'average' house will cost significantly less than 125k, just as it did a decade ago, so this measure will make no difference.

Posted by Paul | 06.08.08, 18:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

in a civilized society people should not enjoy the misery of some mis fortunate who only wanted to own their property. it is not a crime but when the interest rates are raised by the central bank that are private banks then these crisis happen.read the following before making any judgment;

Thomas Jefferson's Warning To America :

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Written by Jefferson in a letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802).

Well you draw your own conclusion now!!!

Posted by ebbi britt | 06.08.08, 17:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

86 Comments


Preparing for power

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date