UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 6° London Hi 8°C / Lo 5°C

Smith faces 'sleaze' probe over second home

By Gavin Cordon, Press Association

The Home Secretary Jacqui Smith was tonight facing a parliamentary "sleaze" investigation over her second home allowance.

It emerged that the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, John Lyon, has written to Ms Smith calling on her to explain the £116,000 which she has claimed since becoming an MP.

Ms Smith insisted she has done nothing wrong and said she was "very happy" to answer the commissioner's questions.

Mr Lyon had previously rejected two complaints into her decision to designate her sister's house in south-east London - where she stays when she is in the capital - as her main home.

The move has enabled her to collect at least £116,000 over the years in second home allowances on her constituency home in Redditch, Worcestershire, where her family live.

It is understood that the latest complaint was submitted by two of her London neighbours, Dominic and Jessica Taplin, who are challenging her claims over the amount of time she spent there.

A spokesman for Mr Lyon said: "He has accepted a complaint against Jacqui Smith and is following the procedure laid down for him."

Mrs Taplin was quoted in the Mail on Sunday as describing Ms Smith's claim that she spent most of the week there as a "fabrication".

The couple claimed that often she was there for just two days a week and rarely spent Sunday nights there.

Ms Smith insisted today that her accommodation arrangements were fully in line with Commons rules.

"I sought advice about the arrangements that I make for living in two places like lots of MPs have to," she said.

"I followed the advice that I was given and I followed the rules. And therefore I'm very happy to answer further questions that the independent commissioner puts to me."

Ms Smith was said to be confident that she could refute the allegations made by Mr and Mrs Taplin, insisting there were "factual inaccuracies" in their account to the Mail on Sunday.

There was some anger within Labour circles at the apparent role of the Tories in the affair.

Conservative sources confirmed that Mrs Taplin had sent an email last week to the office of party leader David Cameron outlining her concerns.

The sources said the email was not read by Mr Cameron although a party official did suggest that she might want to contact a newspaper as a matter of "public interest".

Mr Cameron said today he believed that there were questions for Ms Smith to answer about her second home arrangements.

"I think we need to know what is her main home," he told BBC Radio Five Live. "The process is now under way and she is going to be asked those questions and she will have to answer them."

Mr Lyon's decision to look into the Home Secretary's allowances was welcomed by Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker.

"There is clearly an opportunity for MPs to designate their first and second homes in order to maximise financial advantage, which cannot be right," he said.

"We need to get to a stage where the publication of MPs' expenses is seen as non-remarkable, and there is no longer cause for outrage whenever they are published."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

She knows best!!
[info]bobby55smith wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 05:41 pm (UTC)
She should really be investigated for her complete disregard for expert bodies that have recommended many sensible policies only to find Jacqui Smith knows better than them. She has no competence at all, is an authoritarian puppet with strings played by the civil service and police and this latest episode demonstrates how out of touch she is with the people of this country (who pay her wages and subsidise her bizzare expenses claims). Time for her to return to Burma!
[info]akahamish wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 05:42 pm (UTC)
Isn't it time this woman packed her bags, from whatever residence she purports to be her main home, and did the honourable thing and resigned from office? Her personal integrity and her recent idiotic decisions are now making her the headlines, generating complete contempt from the law abiding citizens at large. Begone woman, begone.
Alas Smith and homes
[info]goosegreece wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 06:12 pm (UTC)
The rules governing this type of situation are far too lax and seem to rely too much on common sense and decency. Both of which are in short supply when pigs are snuffling round the trough of the public purse. And thats before we start talking about honesty!
[info]cm999 wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 06:28 pm (UTC)
Well another one at the trough. Why dont we keep some of the construction industry employed and build a block of flats with enough flats for 1 per constituency. The flats, maintained by the state would be occupied by the incumbent MP for the constituency. No need for expenses, no need for the John Lewis list all in 1 go. I think it has a lot to commend it.
Say, Jacqui...
[info]steve_wilds wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 06:45 pm (UTC)
... would an ID card have prevented you from abusing the taxpayer's purse?
The "Home" Secretary
[info]weatherill wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 07:34 pm (UTC)
If Jacqui Smith claims that her Worcester home is her second home presumably that house will be liable to Capital Gains Tax in due course.
Will we see the "Rental Agreement" Jacqui has with her sister? Has Jacqui declared to the Revenue that her London "home" is her main residence for Tax purposes? If so when did she so declare?
Presumably Jacqui does not claim travel expenses for Worcs, save for Constituency visits.
How long have these "arrangements" been in place?
Does Jacqui's sister have consent from her Mortgagees (if there are any) to let a portion of her house?
The whole situation is a sad reflection on the quality and standard of those who should be way above this sort of sleaze. What a greedy incompetent woman. On your bike back to Worcs please, where hopefully you will shortly lose your seat.
Squirm and wriggle
[info]neanderthalman wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 07:47 pm (UTC)
As the head of law and order in this land I would like to respect our home secretary. However respect is earned, and sadly I have no respect for someone that cannot see how the average person is struggling to make ends meet while she lines her pockets with tax payers money, whether the rules say so or not.
Either Balls is right or Smith is right
[info]pilsden wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 07:50 pm (UTC)
lets face it either london or the constituency should be the basis for payment not the largest bill .
Nosey neighbours
[info]tomhmacf wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 08:24 pm (UTC)
It's beginning to look a lot like the fag-end of the Major years, only less entertaining.

Back then it was a certain minister who was said to be, er, 'performing' dressed only in his Chelsea shirt.

New Labour always lacked that kind of style.



Re: Nosey neighbours
[info]steve_wilds wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 08:53 pm (UTC)
That wasn't style, it was a nightmarish image that scarred a generation.
[info]keithee wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 08:54 pm (UTC)
Ther is an easy way to check where she is staying and for how long.her mobile phone signal records can be checked.As she is so keen on snooping on everyone else ( id cards etc).She will of course have no problem with this.....
[info]dnmurphy wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 09:35 pm (UTC)
I suspect that jackboot is within the rules and will be found not guilty. But all that says is that the rules are wrong. or that she not behaving in the spirit of the rules but more as a nasty huckster. Just another grunter with her snout in the trough.
Not Broke the Rules
[info]rants_a_lot wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 10:17 pm (UTC)
I'm sure that she has complied with the rules written by MPs designed to give them fair expenses.

But no matter what she says the thought that her main home is her sisters back room is complete balls.

Feel really sorry for the neighbours that complained, they'll now get fully investigated by the police to try and find the dirt on them, maybe a little paranoid but it would not surprise me.

Its the same as that other labour MP a while back who got a new mortgage on a house he owned just to claim it back in expenses.

The whole sorry lot of them make my brain hurt.
Remove her bonus
[info]gc9723 wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 10:25 pm (UTC)
If we can force the banks to remove the bankers' legal bonuses, how come we can't apply the same logic to the MPs' 2nd home bonuses, just because 'it don't seem fair'?

And take some of her DNA too. What's good for the goose...
Quit now
[info]frank67 wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 10:37 pm (UTC)
Smith should resign, if not then his boss must sack her immediately.
A finger wagger
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 01:16 am (UTC)
is the most objectionable of petty crooks.

What on earth is this woman doing in charge of the police?

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date