Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Smith ready for deal on reform: Party leader prepared to modify his plans for 'one member, one vote'

Patricia Wynn Davies,Barrie Clement
Tuesday 06 July 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

JOHN SMITH, the Labour leader, is prepared to modify his proposals for 'one member, one vote' party leadership elections as the pay-off for union agreement to the reform in parliamentary selections.

Mr Smith is prepared to agree to retain the existing electoral college for leadership contests in which trade unionists who pay the political levy could participate if they registered as Labour supporters.

As the explosive debate with the unions has worn on, the Labour leader has avoided explicitly ruling out such a deal, concentrating his efforts on insisting - as he still does - that from this autumn political levy paying trade unionists should pay an extra amount, 'levy-plus', to become full party members before voting in parliamentary selections.

His preparedness to accept a trade- off now coincides with reports that taking union block votes and constituency votes together, the reforms would be lost by as much as five to one when put to the autumn policy- making conference. Bill Morris, general secretary of the Transport and General Workers' Union, the party's biggest affiliate, described the shift of stance as 'very positive', promising to examine any proposals.

Mr Smith's speech to the 700 delegates at the TGWU conference in Bournemouth today will emphasise heavily that 'one member, one vote' remains the guiding principle for internal party elections.

But a draft form of words that could be put as an amendment to a conference resolution is already circulating, while a Labour source close to Mr Smith said: 'In order to find a way through he's not pushing the leadership as hard as before.'

That marked change of tone was backed by Roy Hattersley, the former deputy leader, who said in a radio interview that Mr Smith would be 'mildly embarrassed' by stepping back on reforming the leadership election, which was not on the immediate agenda, but that it might be necessary 'to convince some people that it is not his intention to break the link with the trade unions'.

Mr Smith will not give any ground, however, on suggestions that the decision on parliamentary selections should be postponed until next year's conference.

Debate is continuing on a further possible inducement - keeping the 'levy-plus' payment to a modest or even nominal sum. But there were warnings yesterday that party finances 'must remain secure'.

The Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union - the only big Labour affiliate to support one member, one vote - yesterday announced a 75 per cent secret ballot vote for maintaining its political fund, all of which goes to the Labour Party.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in