UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

'Thread of dishonesty' runs through premiership, claims Cameron

By Daniel Bentley and Joe Churcher, Press Association

David Cameron launched a stinging attack on Gordon Brown today, saying there was a "thread of dishonesty" running through his premiership.

He described the apparent postponement of the next spending review as an attempt to "cover up the truth about Labour's cuts".

The Tory leader said the move was part of the Government's "pattern of deception" in the recent row over future spending on public services.

Business Secretary Lord Mandelson indicated today that the Government would not set out new public spending plans before the next general election, arguing it was currently impossible to forecast the economy two years ahead.

But Mr Cameron, speaking at a Westminster press conference, said: "Cancelling the spending review is nothing to do with economic uncertainty and everything to do with political manoeuvring.

"It is a blatant attempt to cover up the truth about Labour's cuts."

Lord Mandelson's intervention today came after weeks of rowing between Labour and the Tories about the need for spending cuts after the next election.

Mr Cameron said that Mr Brown had shown a "complete lack of respect for the people of this country" because he had not been frank about the challenges facing Britain.

He accused the Prime Minister claiming that spending on public services would rise when the Government's own figures showed it was going to fall.

"We shouldn't be surprised," he went on. "I believe there is a thread of dishonesty running through this premiership.

"From cancelling the election and then saying it had nothing to do with the opinion polls, to his claim that abolishing the 10p income tax (rate) would have nothing to do in terms of hitting the poor.

"We've had his insistence that Alistair Darling is his first choice as Chancellor, and now this frankly pattern of deception about public spending."

Mr Brown was today launching a new national plan for public services, called Building Britain's Future, as he seeks to regain the political initiative.

But, in view of Lord Mandelson's comments about the spending review, Mr Cameron said: "Today we've got a relaunch without a spending tag."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Oh Really?
[info]cakesnatcher wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:15 pm (UTC)
...and this from the man who said he was against "Punch and Judy Politics". Cameron is an opportunist with very little substance and it's becoming obvious.
Re: Oh Really?
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 01:54 pm (UTC)
and both will tell you that the swine flu is a reality.

http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html
oh really
[info]leamutt wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC)

Yeah but regrettably its almost inevitable he'll win.
cakesnatcher
[info]mykleboon wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:47 pm (UTC)
A lot of people are against "Punch and Judy" politics. However, when the Prime Minister is so dishonest and takes every opportunity to make party politial gains, whatever it costs the country, then he needs to be exposed. Cruel words hurt more when they are the truth!
Jolly good too...
[info]popskihaynes wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:48 pm (UTC)
Cameron needs to keep hammering Brown because regardless of your politics, it is clear to all that Brown is deliberately lying through every orifice he has available to him. His basic proposition is that he "hopes something will turn up..." Which is a bit like you and I basing our next years personal spending plans on us winning a substantial prize on the Lottery !

Even if the housing market has bottomed out, even if the economy is stabilising, things will not improve overnight, the global economy is in flux and the new version is yet to be born or evolved. This is not going to be like the boom and bust cycles of the past when things recovered over a relatively short period of time, this is a 10 year haul and frankly, Brown and New Labour are the "bed Blockers" of UK plc, we need them to be gone, they have had their turn and mucked it up.

Even if you don't like Cameron and the Tories, we need them elected asap so that they can get on with sorting out the economy. I shouldn't worry about "Tory Ideology" either, they will have little room to do anything too much for the first 5 years. In a sense, Cameron will become PM at the opposite end of the economic cycle to Blair:

In 1997 Blair walked into an economy with sound finances and a rising growth in global trade, he had all the money in the World to spend and not a single strong idea of what he wanted to do with it.

Cameron will have all the ideas and know exactly what he would like to do but no money to do anything plus an underlying structural shortfall of 40-50 billion pa because public sector spending and in addition, interest payments on Government Debt that exceed the whole Defence Budget by a considerable margin - Nice one Gordon.

We need an Autumn Election to hose these Labour idiots off the Treasury Benches. As for Brown, those the Gods wish to destroy...
At long last is Gordon Brown really to be held to account?
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 01:03 pm (UTC)
Gordon Brown has a very long history of being "economical with the truth" and his bullying and bluster have prevented him being held to account so far.

Now that he is actually refusing to accept the spending numbers put forward by his own government, he can finally be exposed. Given the very grave economic outlook for the UK, it is time for all politicians to stop spouting arrant nonsense and just give the facts to the public.

David Cameron has struck a telling blow by directly questioning the integrity of Gordon Brown. How the Prime Minister responds could be a defining moment for his reputation.
Look at that snake "Lord" Mandelson, for example...
[info]reiksares wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 01:04 pm (UTC)
... the unelected turd who is now trying to use legal injunctions (!) to prevent the Bank Of England telling the truth about the state of the economy these useless wreckers have produced.

It's like Ceausescu's Romania - an unelected thug uses the State apparatus to suppress the truth, in favour of complete lies that are obvious as lies to the entire population.

Nevermind, we all remember what happened to Ceausescu in the end. It won't be custard next time, Mandy.
A Tory Masterstroke
[info]mrsmug wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 01:40 pm (UTC)
A new conservative government could agree to keep Gordon Brown on, put him in a cage in the cabinet room and seek his opinion on every new decision and initiative. Then do the exact opposite. How could that possibly fail.
They could occasionally invite members of the public to prod him with a big stick - just for amusement.
Enough of the personal attacks, Dave
[info]ralph23 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 02:34 pm (UTC)
Someone should tell Cameron that the public can see through his policy-lite ad-hominem attacks on Brown. It's obvious that he's so short of ideas on how to solve this economic crisis that he's decided to bring politics down to the gutter. He highlights this: "We've had his insistence that Alistair Darling is his first choice as Chancellor ..." Even if Brown really did want Balls as his Chancellor (which we only "know" through media speculation) does it constitute lying to be discreet about this? You could trawl through a hundred years of UK politics and find thousands of instances of senior politicians not telling the whole truth about the process of government. It's the decisions and actions that count, not the manoeuvring behind them. How would it help politics or the economy if Brown went on air and blabbed about how he really considered three or four people but plumped for Darling.

In the same category is the non-election issue. Of COURSE Brown didn't admit to having read adverse opinion polls. You really expect him to say, "Yeah, I decided against the election because I was afraid we might lose it". All that this proves is that Brown is a heavy-weight pol who doesn't shout his mouth off.

It really is time for Cameron to stop the personal attacks. Accusing a PM of lying is quite a serious claim and disreputable when it is not borne out by any evidence.

Brown is probably correct to contrast Labour investment with Tory cuts. It' not a lie, it's a natural conclusion. We know from experience that this is how it goes with the Tories. Brown's also correct to insist on seeing how the economy grows in coming months and years before deciding whether the priority is further spending or tightening. Growth will allow us to pay back the debts. But the Tories would have cut NOW in the middle of a recession, with disastrous effects, that much is true. I lie not.
Re: Enough of the personal attacks, Dave
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:27 pm (UTC)
Gordon Brown talks about himself all the time, his moral compass, his puritanical upbringing (like Roman Catholics or Bhuddists are all liars), his man of the manse. But what policy does he have? He cannot even come up with a budget, the excuse being that he is clueless about the economy.
Re: Enough of the personal attacks, Dave
[info]ralph23 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
Leave the Buddhists out of this!
Thread of dishonesty runs through much of parliament: Not confined to one party
[info]richardjeff wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 03:20 pm (UTC)
I have difficulty in trusting anyone in the main parties and that includes PR Dave. As his party goes more to the right he presents a reasonable front to be dropped once they are in power. I am currently living in Spain but my wife wants to go back to the UK. I'm not sure if I want to but I think if either Labour or the Tories win Britain is doomed. If LibDems do well I might come back.
says the slippery toff Blair lookalike who one minute
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:53 pm (UTC)
says there is such a thing as society and the next minute is eulogising the children's milk snatching crone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTbdnNgqfs8
Right from wrong person
[info]scousekraut wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:43 pm (UTC)
He is right but so what. Cameron is Nu Labour Lite. They support the banksters, they support the Zionists, the wars in the Middle East, they have numerous Bilderbergers among them, many are centralists and Internationalists that support the Lisbon Treaty. They are just not as bad as Labour and Cameron's policies are reactive and not proactive.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date