Tories pledge extra protection for householders
A Conservative government would review legislation on householders' rights to protect themselves against burglars, shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said today.
Mr Grayling said the Tories would "look to provide the right level of protection for householders".
His comments follow the case of Buckinghamshire businessman Munir Hussain, who was last week jailed for 30 months after pursuing and beating a member of a gang who had tied up his family at knife-point in their home.
At present, the law allows householders to use "reasonable" force to defend themselves against intruders in their homes.
Two attempts by Conservative backbenchers to change the law to allow any force that is not "grossly disproportionate" failed in the Commons in 2004 and 2005.
In response to public concern, Justice Secretary Jack Straw last year issued a clarification spelling out that people would be protected legally if they defended themselves 'instinctively', they feared for their own safety or that of others, and the level of force used was not excessive or disproportionate.
But he was criticised for doing no more than restate the existing legal position.
Mr Grayling today told the Sunday Telegraph: "At the moment the law allows a defendant to use 'reasonable force' to protect him or herself, their family or their property.
"Conservatives argue that the defence that the law offers a householder should be much clearer, and that prosecutions and convictions should only happen in cases where courts judge the actions involved to be 'grossly disproportionate'."
Hussain was convicted last week of causing grievious bodily harm with intent, after he and his brother used a cricket bat to beat one of the intruders who broke into his home and threatened his family.
Judge John Reddihough last week noted Hussain's "courage" but said that he carried out a "dreadful, violent attack" on the intruder as he lay defenceless.
Former Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy said he did not believe the law needs to be changed.
Mr Kennedy told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "My own personal feeling is that it is best left to the courts. I think there is sufficient discretion in the existing legislation for the courts to judge each case on its individual circumstances.
"But there is no doubt that there is a considerable public head of steam about this."
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 3 Japanese island overrun with cats after population explodes
- 4 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 5 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
California teacher appears to have hanged herself in her classroom
The City of the Monkey God: Archaeologists claim to have found city lost for 1,000 years in remote Honduran jungle
Ed Miliband deemed less influential than One Direction's Louis Tomlinson by official Doncaster power list
Japanese island overrun with cats after population explodes
Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
£16000 - £46000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an opportunity to join ...
£9 - £13 per hour: Recruitment Genius: This is a great opportunity to join a s...
£25000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Have you got a proven track rec...
£15000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a great opportunity for...