Wealthy parents to gain most from childcare changes announced in the Budget
Government’s own watchdog says low-income families in need of support will lose out
Andrew Grice has been Political Editor of The Independent since 1998. He was previously Political Editor of The Sunday Times, where he worked for 10 years, and he has been a Westminster-based journalist since 1982. His column, Inside Politics, appears in The Independent each Saturday.
Sunday 30 March 2014
The Government’s watchdog on child poverty has warned that the more generous state support for childcare costs announced in the Budget will help the rich at the expense of the poor.
Alan Milburn, chairman of the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission, said low-income families will lose out despite George Osborne’s decision to increase the Government’s share of their childcare bills, because a couple with a joint income of £300,000 a year will benefit.
The £750m-a-year “tax-free childcare” scheme will provide up to £2,000 per child each year, by meeting 20 per cent of childcare costs up to a maximum of £10,000 annually. It will start in 2015, and within a year will cover all children under 12 when both parents work.
The Government will meet 85 per cent of childcare bills for people on universal credit.
Mr Milburn told The Independent on Sunday: “The Government has taken half a step forward. The announcement that 85 per cent of childcare costs will be met under universal credit from 2016 will help work pay for low-income families. This is very welcome. The sting in tail is that this £200m expansion in childcare support will come from within the universal credit programme. That risks robbing Peter to pay Paul.”
Mr Milburn, a former Labour cabinet minister, said: “It would have been much fairer to pay for it by reducing support to better-off families. Under these proposals, the taxpayer will continue to offer childcare support to families earning up to £300,000 a year.”
Gavin Kelly, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, welcomed a move that could give some families an extra £1,000 a year of childcare support. But he said: “This policy change is still pretty small beer compared to the far larger sum that is going to be spent extending support via tax-free childcare. About 80 per cent of the gains from this will flow upwards to those in the top half of the income distribution. It’s also the case that it’s low- and middle-income parents who find the costs of childcare the biggest obstacle to taking on more work – so targeting support at them would make sense.”
A survey by the Resolution Foundation carried out with Mumsnet found that a majority of parents want to limit childcare support to families on incomes lower than those proposed under the Government’s package. More than half (57 per cent) thought the cut-off should be £75,000 a year or lower, while a quarter thought it should be set at £50,000.
- 1 If you weren't afraid of flying before last week... you probably are now
- 2 Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
- 3 Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
- 4 Lauren Goodger calls for tougher laws on revenge porn after sex tape leaks online
- 5 Iraq crisis: End 'very near' for Christianity after Isis takeover, says Bishop
Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Opponents of Israel's military operation in Gaza are the real enemies of Middle Eastern peace
Were 'Poor Doors' added to mixed developments so wealthy residents don't have to go in alongside social housing tenants?
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
£30000 per annum: Ashdown Group: A highly reputable software house is looking ...
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Ashdown Group: An established professional services...
Highly Attractive Salary: Austen Lloyd: CITY - SENIOR COMMERCIAL LITIGATION SO...
£35000 - £40000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: My client is...