Probation proposals attacked as perverse
Friday 19 May 1995
Home Affairs Correspondent.
Plans to scrap university-based training for probation officers were yesterday described as "perverse, doctrinaire and counter-productive".
The heads of the country's universities warned that to reduce the knowledge and skills of the service could lead to a "considerable risk" to the public.
Their attack on Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, comes only a day after a senior High Court judge said the decision to opt for on-the-job training was the equivalent of pointing a pistol at the head of the probation service.
Mr Justice Garland warned that the proposals would reduce standards among a profession which handles vital work with offenders - including supervision of serious offenders like murderers and rapists when they leave prison.
The criticisms coincide with a lobby of Parliament by 1,400 probation officers who claim the Government is destroying the service's professionalism.
In one of the most radical shake-ups of the service, Mr Howard plans to scrap the social work diploma and instead tailor training to suit the needs of individual recruits. Ministers hope this will attract more former members of police and the armed forces as part of a move to harden the service's practices and image.
Mr Howard said: "I propose to sweep away the barriers to the recruitment of people who have relevant skills and experience to offer but who lack the social work diploma qualification which is at present required by the law."
But yesterday the committee of vice-chancellors and principals, said the two-year university- based training was "a relatively short time" in which to acquire the necessary legal, criminal and social policy knowledge base as well as the professional and practical skills required.
"Probation work demands strong critical intellectual skills in order to deal with high-risk offenders and with the increasing knowledge required with so much new legislation."
They also pointed out that the plans contradict the findings of a Home Office review which found that the service was "very effective in the training and recruitment methods it employs".
Dr Kenneth Edwards, chairman of the committee said: "These plans are perverse, doctrinaire and counter productive." The Government was ignoring its own research in pursuit of cost savings that "are probably illusory".
- 1 Bill Clinton portrait features Monica Lewinsky reference, artist admits
- 2 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 3 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 4 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
- 5 Average penis size revealed: Scientists attempt to find what is 'normal' to reassure concerned men
Bill Clinton portrait features Monica Lewinsky reference, artist admits
Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
Kanye West gives guest lecture at Oxford University: 'If I, Kanye West, can remove my ego, I think there's hope for everyone'
'This is what Islam tells us to do': A rare glimpse inside a Saudi Arabian prison – where Isis terrorists are showered with perks and privileges
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
£35000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an excellent opportunit...
£15000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Trainee Case Handler/Probate ...
£16000 - £20000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This precious metal refining co...
£20000 - £29000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Senior Conveyancing Fee Earne...