Putting a value on taking action
Thursday 03 December 1992
The daughter decided to close the account and move her money elsewhere. She had pounds 10 taken from the pounds 53 in the account as a closing charge. Mrs W pointed out that had her daughter merely withdrawn the pounds 53 there would have been no charge.
The Ombudsman said the pounds 10 fee was not included in the bank's tariff, and in any event the account would have been closed six months later when Miss W became 19. The complaint was eligible for investigation.
Mrs W visited her bank after hearing the Ombudsman's initial positive reaction and came away with a cheque for pounds 10.
A bank lent money to an architect and his wife to develop two properties in 1988. A year later Mr and Mrs D queried the interest charged and were credited with almost pounds 11,000.
Two years later after the two properties were sold, he again queried the interest calculations. He received five further refunds totalling almost pounds 5,000.
Mr and Mrs D claimed compensation for inconvenience and the time spent arguing their case.
The bank accepted the out-of- pocket expenses for solicitors' and accountants' fees of pounds 617 but rejected Mr D's claim for pounds 25,000 based on pounds 25 an hour - the rate he charged his clients - for his own time, plus pounds 1,000 for inconvenience.
The total sum awarded by the Ombudsman was pounds 1,500 - pounds 1,000 for inconvenience and pounds 500 for Mr D's own time.
Mr and Mrs D rejected the bank's offer in line with the Ombudsman's decision.
Mr K's father-in-law died aged 87 having been a customer of the same bank for nearly 70 years.
He had pounds 27,000 in a deposit account earning 2 per cent interest.
Mr K complained that the bank should have directed his father- in-law to the bank's higher paying deposit acount which had been available for some time.
The bank said that the man was lucid, and it had written to all customers, including him, twice, to draw attention to its new high interest deposit account. The new account would not have offered the same sweep facility that he was using to top up his current account to a balance of pounds 3,000.
The Ombudsman said the bank had taken reasonable steps to make information about the new account available, so that customers could make an informed choice.
The complaint was rejected.
Guide dog mauled while helping owner deliver Christmas cards
Life on Earth may have developed below rather than above ground, reveal scientists
Nelson Mandela’s complex bond with Britain
The poorest pay the price for austerity: Workers face biggest fall in living standards since Victorian era
10 stone five-year-old taken into care
- 1 Gurdwaras-turned-food banks: Sikh temples are catering for rise in Britain’s hungry
- 2 Council bans use of word ‘Commie’ – but ‘fascist’ and ‘Nazi’ are fine
- 3 The man who made Femen: New film outs Victor Svyatski as the mastermind behind the protest group and its breast-baring stunts
- 4 The poorest pay the price for austerity: Workers face biggest fall in living standards since Victorian era
- 5 Mass murder in the Middle East is funded by our friends the Saudis
- < Previous
- Next >
£85000 per annum + benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: Top 15 Firm - Qualified AC...
Salary £35-50K Plus Generous Benefits Package including Car,Pension ,and Health...
Negotiable: Capita Education Resourcing Permanent Team: Capita Education Resou...
£2000 - £25500 per annum + Benefits: Flight Centre Limited: We are seeking an ...