Sentencing U-turns baffle courts
Sunday 01 August 1993
High Court judges and representatives from the Magistrates' Association and National Association of Probation Officers (Napo) told senior Home Office civil servants at a private meeting in June that the latest in a series of changes to the law should be postponed until 1994 to give sentencers time to understand how to operate the system.
However, Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, ignored their warnings of impending confusion and pushed ahead with legislation which will allow the courts to take the previous convictions of minor offenders into account.
The new measure comes into operation on 16 August. It alters the 1992 Criminal Justice Act which did not allow courts to take previous convictions of most minor offenders into account.
The Act was based on the principle that the punishment should fit the crime. Judges should not punish defendants twice by giving higher sentences to offenders with criminal convictions.
Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of Napo, said that total confusion was imminent because the Government was not saying to court staff they could simply go back to their old ways in August.
'The courts are now being told that they can punish people for past offences by looking at previous offences, as they could before October 1992,' he said.
'But they are also being told something new: that the sentences they give should not be 'disproportionate' to the crime before the courts. No one has the faintest idea what that means.'
Probation officers yesterday seized on Judge Robin Laurie's remarks at Southwark Crown Court last Friday to support their argument. The judge said the law gave him no option but to free Anthony Benton, 42, who has a 21-year history of sex convictions. He should have gone to prison for six to eight years for his latest attack, on a girl of nine, the judge said. 'Unfortunately for the public, the current sentencing practices would only permit me to give you 18 months in prison. You have already served that time.'
Mr Howard said yesterday that the judge had got it wrong. Even under the 1992 Act, judges could pass punitive sentences for violent and sexual offences and were able to take patterns of previous offences into account.
- 1 Universities aren't working us hard enough, say undergraduates
- 2 Lego letter from the 1970s still offers a powerful message to parents 40 years later
- 4 Woman opens professional cuddling shop – gets 10,000 customers in first week
- 5 Grayson Perry: London needs affordable housing because 'rich people don't create culture'
Oscar Pistorius terrorised Reeva before he shot her dead, says June Steenkamp
Audacious North Korean kidnap plot foiled at Paris airport as 'Asian men' attempted to bundle student onto plane
Heroin to be prescribed to Canadian addicts by doctors
Tower Bridge glass walkway 'smashed' by night-time visitor dropping bottle of beer
The young are the new poor: Sharp increase in number of under-25s living in poverty, while over-65s are better off than ever
Rochester by-election: Ukip gains second MP as Tory defector Mark Reckless holds seat
'Beast of Bolsover' Dennis Skinner takes Ukip MP Mark Reckless to task moments after he is sworn in
Rochester by-election: Labour MP Emily Thornberry resigns after posting white van and England flags tweet
France 'blocks' Russian sailors from boarding a warship
Rochester aftermath: Sacking of Emily Thornberry will make work of Labour MPs '10 times harder'
Exclusive: UK approved £7m Israeli arms sales in six months before Gaza conflict
£45000 - £65000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Progressive practice, punching ...
£45000 - £50000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a fantastic opportunity...
£25000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This an exciting opportunity to...
£28000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Lift Engineer is required to jo...