Sentencing U-turns baffle courts
Sunday 01 August 1993
High Court judges and representatives from the Magistrates' Association and National Association of Probation Officers (Napo) told senior Home Office civil servants at a private meeting in June that the latest in a series of changes to the law should be postponed until 1994 to give sentencers time to understand how to operate the system.
However, Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, ignored their warnings of impending confusion and pushed ahead with legislation which will allow the courts to take the previous convictions of minor offenders into account.
The new measure comes into operation on 16 August. It alters the 1992 Criminal Justice Act which did not allow courts to take previous convictions of most minor offenders into account.
The Act was based on the principle that the punishment should fit the crime. Judges should not punish defendants twice by giving higher sentences to offenders with criminal convictions.
Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of Napo, said that total confusion was imminent because the Government was not saying to court staff they could simply go back to their old ways in August.
'The courts are now being told that they can punish people for past offences by looking at previous offences, as they could before October 1992,' he said.
'But they are also being told something new: that the sentences they give should not be 'disproportionate' to the crime before the courts. No one has the faintest idea what that means.'
Probation officers yesterday seized on Judge Robin Laurie's remarks at Southwark Crown Court last Friday to support their argument. The judge said the law gave him no option but to free Anthony Benton, 42, who has a 21-year history of sex convictions. He should have gone to prison for six to eight years for his latest attack, on a girl of nine, the judge said. 'Unfortunately for the public, the current sentencing practices would only permit me to give you 18 months in prison. You have already served that time.'
Mr Howard said yesterday that the judge had got it wrong. Even under the 1992 Act, judges could pass punitive sentences for violent and sexual offences and were able to take patterns of previous offences into account.
- 1 Scottish referendum: So how about the English now being given a chance to split from England?
- 4 Matthew Miller: American sentenced to hard labour in North Korea 'wanted to be Snowden II'
- 5 Iranian blogger found guilty of insulting Prophet Mohammad on Facebook sentenced to death
Stamford Hill council removes 'unacceptable' posters telling women which side of the road to walk down
Kim Kardashian 'naked pictures' leaked on 4chan weeks after Jennifer Lawrence 'The Fappening' scandal
Isis in Syria: 60,000 Kurds flee terror in new exodus
Iranian blogger found guilty of insulting Prophet Mohammad on Facebook sentenced to death
4Chan naked photos leak: Celebrity Twitter reactions to the mass breach of privacy
Scottish independence referendum: A nation divided against itself
Scottish referendum results: Cross-party consensus collapses amid Tory-Labour spat on the 'English question'
Scottish independence: David Cameron is becoming the 'George Bush of Britain'
Russia freezes Ukraine into submission: Kiev admits country doesn't have enough fuel for winter
Archbishop of Canterbury admits doubts about existence of God
Portuguese academic says British are 'filthy, violent and drunk'
Unpaid Voluntary Position : Reach Volunteering: Volunteer your expertise as Tr...
£68 - £73 per day + Competitive rates of pay based on experience: Randstad Edu...
£69 - £73 per day + Competitive London rates of pay: Randstad Education Group:...
£117 - £157 per day + Competitive London rates: Randstad Education Group: * Pr...