Teaching unions accuse minister of interfering: The focus of education for younger children is to be switched to more specialist subject teaching and increased 'setting' within ability groups
The National Association of Head Teachers says in a statement: 'Previous secretaries of state have understood that they have neither the expertise nor the wisdom to dictate to teachers how they should teach.'
Other teachers' unions criticised the Government for failing to reduce the subject matter that primary schools have had to cover since the introduction of a nine-subject national curriculum.
Nigel de Gruchy, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, said an overloaded curriculum was threatening teaching of the basics that the Government so favoured.
Ministers were 'resurrecting the bogey of the so-called progressive teaching methods of the 1960s - itself a myth since report after report showed that the majority of primary schools retained largely traditional methods. There is no substitute for serious dialogue with the representatives of teachers,' he said.
Peter Smith, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said a review of the whole curriculum was needed, not a five-year 'rolling programme of promises'.
The National Union of Teachers said Mr Patten's proposals were unrealistic; many primary schools were too small to avoid mixed-age classes.
Doug McAvoy, the union's general secretary, said most primary schools had little more than one teacher per class. 'Specialisation would require at least 1.5 teachers per class; that costs money and I doubt whether the Government would be willing to meet the cost.'
Ann Taylor, shadow Secretary of State for Education, attacked Mr Patten for constantly changing his mind. There was now a measure of agreement between parents, teachers and the Labour Party that the curriculum was overloaded and too prescriptive, she said.
The extent to which the proposals will change the system are unclear. Research for the four-year Leverhulme Primary Project at Exeter University's school of education, to be published in May, suggests that primary teachers spend one-third of their time on whole-class teaching. Researchers observed lessons by 60 teachers around the country.
Previous studies at Exeter suggest that most teachers already 'set' their pupils according to ability. However, work done by Professor Neville Bennett shows setting needs to be well-organised to be effective.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
- 3 The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
- 4 Why you're almost certainly more like your father than your mother
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Nigel Farage promises Ukip will not 'stigmatise' would-be migrants – and says he wants 'everyone to speak the same language'
Ex-head of MI6: 'We shouldn't kid ourselves that Russia is on a path to democracy'
Most people think legal tax avoidance is just as wrong as illegal tax evasion, poll suggests
£16000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: They are an award-winning digit...
£45000 - £55000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: Senior VMware Platform En...
£10000 - £16000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A distributor of specialist ele...
£17000 - £19000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A distributor of specialist ele...