Ten thousand 'locked in the benefits trap'
Their income was meant to be protected by 'transitional arrangements' when income support replaced supplementary benefit in the massive shake-up of the welfare system resulting from the 1988 Social Security Act.
New criteria for calculating the level of income support would have left 1.4 million people worse off than they were under the old system, so 'transitional additions' were introduced to ensure that cash values did not fall.
The idea was that the transitional addition would be eroded as the income support element rose each year to reach the former supplementary benefit level. However, 10,000 people are still waiting for an annual cost-of-living increase in their benefit payments to be restored, and some will not receive an inflation rise until 1997, the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) has established.
The organisation took legal advice on the highly complex battery of regulations that stemmed from the 1988 Act, in the belief that what it saw as a glaring anomaly might have been unlawful. CPAG officers had hoped that they might have been able to bring a test case through the European Court of Justice. They have now learned that there are no grounds for such a challenge.
Vicki Chapman, the CPAG's legal officer, said: 'The lack of a legal remedy means that many people are finding it really hard to live on their benefits. After the 1988 Act was passed, the fine detail of the transitional arrangements was left to subsequent regulation, and I do not think that MPs fully understood the implications of what was being proposed, in the case of those whose income support worked out lower than the supplementary benefit they had previously received.
'It seemed that their position would be protected and it was in cash terms, but not in real terms.'
Government ministers accepted there were losers as well as gainers from the 1988 changes, but justified them by insisting it was necessary to give more to those most in need.
Campaigners countered that there were losers in all categories of claimants.
With the toughest public spending round for years expected in the autumn, they are pessimistic about the chances of any improvements in the financial circumstances of those who lost out.
'We believe that many of the 10,000 people affected by this particular trap are elderly or disabled,' Ms Chapman said.
'This is because they are claimants whose previous supplementary benefit included elements to cover special dietary needs, or something relating to the individual's physical condition.
'There doesn't seem to be any way in which they can be helped under the present system.'
- 2 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 3 Russian officials ban yoga because it's too much like a religious cult
- 4 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 5 Ginger Pride festival to take place next summer, organisers say 'time of bullying gingers is over'
Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
People are American flagging their Facebook profile pictures in response to those rainbow flagging them
Ginger Pride festival to take place next summer, organisers say 'time of bullying gingers is over'
Historic meeting between Pope Francis and Russian Orthodox head 'getting closer'
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
They are neither a 'state' nor 'Islamic': Why we shouldn't call them Isis, Isil or IS
Tunisia beach attack: How can British Muslims respond to the latest outrages?
£18000 - £24000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An exciting opportunity has ari...
£15000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An On-line Sales & Customer Ser...
£15000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the largest hospitality companies...
£28000 - £32000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: As a result of significant cont...