No water risk details in home information packs
Tuesday 31 July 2007
Latest in This Britain
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Ministers faced renewed criticism over the flooding crisis after it emerged that controversial new home information packs will not include details about the flood risk to properties.
Conservatives said that the scheme was "utterly untrustworthy and misleading" because new figures showed that one in ten new houses had been built on flood plains.
The troubled Home Information Packs become compulsory for people selling houses with four or more bedrooms from tomorrow.
But the Conservatives said that ministers had failed to act on warnings that the packs did too little to warn homebuyers about risks from environmental threats.
A parliamentary written answer published as the Commons closed for the summer revealed that 10 per cent of new homes built in 2004 were in flood-risk areas, with provisional figures for 2005 showing that 9 per cent were at risk from floodwaters.
Grant Shapps, the shadow Housing minister, warned that sellers were unlikely to include flood risk information in selling packs if it was not compulsory.
The Department for Communities and Local Government insisted that information on flood risks was already widely available on the Environment Agency website.
The dispute over the packs came as the chairman of the Environment Agency, Sir John Harman, defended bonuses paid to senior staff, despite renewed calls from Conservatives and Liberal Democrats for the cash to be paid back.
The agency's chief executive, Baroness Young of Old Scone, received a 15 per cent bonus of £24,000, while eight other executives, including the director of water management, received awards averaging 10 per cent of their salaries.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments