Once more into the breach of Irish peace talks

'Today's visit by Mr Blair is a timely reminder that the Government is still engaged at the highest level'

Tuesday 18 April 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

First, the good news. David Trimble's continuing capacity to rethink the future of Ulster Unionism has been illustrated once again by his confirmation that he is looking at ways of breaking his party's links with the Orange Order. Of course, he has always taken the view that Unionism needs to adapt to new times if it is to maximise, long term and in the face of the changing demographics of Northern Ireland, its chances of fulfilling its central goal - that of preserving the Union. Nor is it that new an idea, having been at least under consideration by Mr Trimble almost from the moment he became leader. Indeed at one point, it was even a demand by young turks on the right of the party, who thought it might actually help the Ulster Unionists become a less, rather than a more, moderate party.

But that is clearly no longer the view of just such a young turk, Jeffrey Donaldson, the hard-line pretender to the succession to Mr Trimble, who has been quick to denounce the move. There could hardly be a better reason for applauding it. For there is no doubting the symbolic importance of a change which, as The Independent's David McKittrick wrote yesterday, now has the potential to develop into a struggle for the soul of Unionism. For if it ever happens it will do a great deal to modernise the party.

To draw a rough and ready Great Britain parallel - admittedly an imperfect and risky business - the Orange Order's ex officio representation on the Ulster Unionist Council is not wholly unlike the power wielded by the Communist Party in the British Labour Party up to the Eighties through its power to influence the trade union block vote. And before loyal Orangemen throw up their arms at this unlikely - and unwelcome - comparison they should consider the fact that the present system has historically allowed those in other parties - like Ian Paisley's DUP - to exercise influence on the internal deliberations of the UUP. Which in a modern pluralist democracy is very odd indeed.

But the symbolism does not stop there. For all it may have done at times to foster bigotry in Northern Ireland, the Orange Order has certainly not been a terrorist organisation. Nevertheless, and without straining yet another deeply imperfect parallel, the distinction between Orangeism and Unionism would in theory help to throw into sharp relief the paradox that Sinn Fein, a political organisation apparently committed to the ballot box, remains inextricably linked to an army which has yet to prove that it is equally so committed.

More practically, it might be bad news for forces ranged against the Good Friday Agreement, and not only because it would reduce the large minority which came close to unseating David Trimble at the last meeting of the Ulster Unionist Council. The conventional wisdom is that in the short term it will strengthen the DUP, at a time when the Ulster Unionist Party has seen its electoral performance become increasingly unsure over recent years. That could well be so. But in the longer term it might make the possibility of Catholics voting for the Ulster Unionists a shade likelier, at least in those seats where it represented the only hope of defeating a hard-line anti-agreement Protestant.

Just as some loyalists were reputed to have voted for the SDLP candidate Joe Hendron in West Belfast as a means of keeping Sinn Fein out, so parallel behaviour by Catholics could not, perhaps, be necessarily ruled out - for example in Mr Trimble's own seat in North Armagh where one of Northern Ireland's most prominent Orangemen, Dennis Watson, is expected to stand as the DUP candidate. Certainly nationalists would be more rather than less likely to vote in such a way, if the links with the irrevocably Protestant Orange Order were broken.

Indeed, just as with the unions and the Labour Party in Great Britain, there is an argument that both institutions would benefit from the separation. As the Labour MP Harry Barnes pointed out yesterday, it could both help the UUP to broaden its electoral base while allowing the Orange Order to assert itself as a genuinely cultural, rather than a political, organisation.

Having said this, we shouldn't go overboard. Mr Trimble's move is interesting, perhaps, in the long term, very interesting. But against a still fairly sombre background, it is no more than that. It certainly does not solve what yet may be a crisis for the Good Friday Agreement. The reason that Tony Blair is making a day-trip across the Irish Sea this morning is not because there has been some sudden breakthrough in the intensive talks aimed at rescuing the Agreement and restarting the devolved institutions. It is rather, to underline the urgency of finding just such a solution in circumstances in which time is no longer necessarily on the parties' sides.

It may also allow him, by directly meeting the Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to untie a few of the knots that have occurred in tireless officials-to-officials talks. For there is, as there has been for many weeks, theoretical territory on which such a solution might be created in the wake of the suspension of the Assembly and Executive in mid-February. Both Peter Mandelson, several times, and David Trimble - in Washington on his St Patrick's Day visit - have indicated that actual decommissioning of IRA weapons does not have to be a precondition of a return to devolution (particularly as it was not specified as such in the Agreement) if an alternative signal of the republicans' good faith can be substituted for it.

But for Mr Trimble to carry his own party this has to be robust. At the very least, there would surely have to be some unequivocal statement from the IRA that the war is over, coupled with some form of time-frame for decommissioning, however elongated from the one specified on 22 May and however linked to the British Government's promise to implement its own part in the Agreement - Patten report and all. And it is probable that the IRA's bottom line would have to be made public. Nods and winks to General de Chastelaine, the Canadian appointed to oversee decommissioning, didn't work back in February and they probably wouldn't be enough to satisfy the Unionists now.

The reason for the renewed push is partly this. In four days, there is the second anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement. After Easter - always a difficult time for the peace process as Irish republicanism commemorates the 1916 Rising - there is the beginning of the long marching season. On 22 May there is the deadline originally set for decommissioning. Admittedly that is now wholly notional, not least since the Agreement envisaged a much longer period of devolution than the nine weeks of it that actually happened from December to February. But it remains a psychologically important moment. And in the longer term - but perhaps not as long as some may complacently believe - there is the real danger of a return to violence if politics cannot once again triumph in Northern Ireland.

Mr Blair's visit is a timely reminder that the British Government is still engaged at the highest level. And that there will never be a better moment to break the remaining deadlocks than in the next few short weeks.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in