The Vikings: it wasn't all raping and pillaging
Forget what history tells us about the Nordic invaders. New research suggests they were model immigrants who co-existed peacefully with the natives
REUTERS/David Moir
Jarl Squad Vikings march while carrying lit torches to set fire to a Viking longboat during the Up Helly Aa festival in Lerwick, the Shetland Islands in northern Scotland
For centuries, they have been stereotyped as marauding barbarians arriving in their helmeted hordes to pillage their way across Britain. But now a group of academics believe they have uncovered new evidence that the Vikings were more cultured settlers who offered a "good historical model" of immigrant assimilation.
The evidence is set to be unveiled at a three-day Cambridge University conference starting today, when more than 20 studies will reveal how the Vikings shared technology, swapped ideas and often lived side-by-side in relative harmony with their Anglo-Saxon and Celtic contemporaries. Some may have come, plundered and left, but those Vikings who decided to settle rather than return to Scandinavia learnt the language, inter-married, converted to Christianity and even had "praise poetry" written about them by the Brits, according to the experts.
The conference, entitled "Between the Islands", draws on new archeological evidence, historical studies and analysis of the language and literature of the period, and shows that between the 9th and 13th centuries, the Vikings became an integral part of the fabric of social and political life that changed Britain and Ireland far more profoundly than previously realised. The academics hope it will tip the balance still further in the "raiders or traders" question.
Scholars will argue that they should be seen as an early example of immigrants who were successfully assimilated into British and Irish culture. Their so-called "invasion" led, to some extent, to the creation of trans-national identities, a process that has particular relevance to modern Britain. Dr Fiona Edmonds, of Cambridge University's department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic, said: "The latest evidence does not point to a simple opposition between Vikings and natives.
"Within a relatively short space of time – and with lasting effect – the various cultures in Britain and Ireland started to intermingle. Investigating that process provides us with a historical model of how political groups can be absorbed into complex societies, contributing much to those societies in the process. There are important lessons that can be gained from this about cultural assimilation in the modern era."
Dr Máire Ní Mhaonaigh, who is co-organising the conference, said it was not a simple case of the Vikings coming and conquering. There was a "cross-fertilisation" of practices, including Anglo-Saxon communities adopting Norse names. "They were mutually transformed in the process, it was two-way interaction," she said. "Those who settled had to become different, and adapt to the society around them and learn to communicate with each other."
Some Viking kings learnt to speak English, Welsh and Irish as well as Latin, the language of the elite in Britain, and adopted Anglo-Saxon names. One king who settled in Ireland was honoured with "praise" poetry dedicated to his rule by the indigenous community. The Viking kings of Dublin, said Dr Ní Mhaonaigh, became a very active element of the city's political scene.
"What is clear is that the popular picture of Vikings is not quite as it seems, and when viewing their long-term presence, it is quite untrue. The communities were mutually transformed in the process. Of course, there was plundering and pillaging, but those who started to build camps and started to settle began interacting in a very different way," she said.
She added that King Amlaib, who settled in Dublin in the 10th century, became a Christian and was venerated by the local poets, while another leader from the mid-11th century, whose Welsh name was Gruffud ap Cynan, bore Welsh and Norse blood-ties, and spent a long time in Dublin. This, she said, was another example of cultural inter-mingling.
"It's a good historical model when a relatively small number of people can adapt and assimilate into a complex, sophisticated society," she said.
A new analysis of personal names in the Domesday Book also suggests that settlements established in Yorkshire from the 9th century retained their Gaelic-Scandinavian identity until the Norman Conquest. Even after the Battle of Hastings, and long after the Norse were believed to have been expelled from the area, there were people with some element of Scandinavian identity living happily in the heart of Anglo-Saxon Yorkshire. Through this time, they were able to hang on to elements of their Viking identity without expulsion by the indigenous people – further evidence that there was little opposition to these conquering emigres.
Research into Scandinavian settlements reveals a profound level of social and economic interaction between Viking incomers and the Celts. There was mixing in many towns and rural camps in Ireland, while recent studies of regional coins from the Viking age show that these rulers were far from impervious to local economies. In East Anglia, for example, where they had a well regulated monetary system, they adapted the existing economic system, while in other areas with only limited coin circulation, they introduced a bullion economy.
On a cultural level, Celtic folklore began to influence Viking literature. An analysis of Old Norse literary works that shows some of their tales may have been borrowed from Gaelic storytelling, thus the myths of Scandinavia, Ireland and Britain became inexorably intertwined. Professor Judith Jesch, from the University of Nottingham, reveals how Norse poetry was composed in the Hebrides. Professor Terje Spurkland, from the University of Oslo, has found that rune stones combined Scandinavian inscriptions with Celtic designs.
Over the centuries the importance of this cross-fertilisation was overshadowed by a skewed mythology of the Viking age that was created by 12th and 13th century Irish chroniclers and poets long after the Scandinavians' golden era had ended. A host of poems and prose narrative emerged which depicted the Vikings as "otherworldly beings" who came and stream-rollered across the cultural terrain of the British Isles.
These Irish writers went to great lengths to "extol the virtues of their Celtic ancestors who had fended off the Vikings", and so circulated this mythology of the maurading invader. It is only now, in recent decades, that academics have begun to unpick the stereotype and reveal an altogether different story.
From raiders to traders
They were prolific seafaring explorers, warriors and merchants from Denmark, Norway and Sweden who colonised swathes of Europe from the late 800s to the 12th century. In Norse, the word Viking means piracy and therefore the Vikings have become known as raiders who terrorised Europe instead of disciplined conquerors who established settlements as far afield as Constantinople, Greenland and Newfoundland.
There is archaeological evidence they discovered the Americas 500 years before Christopher Columbus. Their famed narrow longships allowed them to enter countries through rivers and it is this access which allowed them to settle and trade throughout Europe. A stereotyped image as a noble savage emerged in 17th century British texts and then again during the Victorian era. This image later turned into a cartoonish caricature of Vikings as barbarian invaders.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
And it goes to show what a multicultural society we have been for centuries. It gives hope that we can get over the tensions generated by recent immigration. A good dose of intermarriage helps. As they say, "Love Conquers All".
A modern parallel is multiculturism ( politically encouraging seperate/ equal ethnic blocks and identities) versus case for integration but still defining by ethnic /cultural groups.
Instead multiculturism should be ditched and assimilation actively encouraged aimed at a single national identity . Without it social strife will get really bad ( eg currently incompatibility of fundamentalist Islam in UK) . The future should be an assimilated melting pot of proud Britons with a British historical identity. Otherwise the indigenous majority will increasingly see the swarm of immigrants as invaders to be repelled.
Unfortunately, the modern Anglo-Saxons do not seem to realise to what an extent the 'separate ethnic groups' have integrated - they would no longer fit into the cultures from which their ancestors sprang. The Asians of Bradford belong to Bradford much more than they do to Lahore or Ludhiana or wherever their ancestors may have come from.
The Jews never gave up their culture or religion. They used to be reviled for living in crowded rooms, for keeping coal in the bathtub, etc - the same thing that Pakistanis were accused of not so long ago. Yet today they are respected members of society.
As for 'incompatibility of fundamentalist Islam in UK', I have noticed that fundamentalist Christianity does not seem to get in the way, although it is alien to modern British society. In what way is Fundamentalist Islam different from Fundamentalist Christianity?
The central concept of British Society for much of the 20th Century was 'fair play'. Yet most British people accepted Thatcherism - which is fundamentally alien to this concept. The British people accepted the lies of the Blairite government and allowed their troops to participate in the slaughter of over a million Iraqis in a new crusade; how alien is this to the British idea of basic decency?
That's the way to do it -
Colm O'Liathain
Do not be lulled by a pacifist ideology that people who come to conquer or kill, won't do it -if you just are nice to them, today's headlines of brutality-should be a warning-and not glossed over as mere propaganda.
Sciatis.
sorry for garbling of my prior comment...
rh
charged with war crimes!
Hartmut,
Perth, Australia
The monks, the only chroniclers of early English history, did not like these new arrival simply because they were pagans. As a result of this dislike the Vikings went down in history as rapists, pillages and murders.
The word Vikings in Old Norse simply meant "people who live on a wick" (a wick being an inlet from the sea, as is Wick in Scotland) and not pillagers and murderers.
The word Vikings in Old Norse simply meant "people who live on a wick" (a wick being an inlet from the sea, as is Wick in Scotland) and not pillagers and murderers.
The author needs to study etymology a little further. The Old Norse word "Vik" means an inlet from the sea.
The Norse word "Vikinger" means "Dwellers on a wick". Wick being the Old English spelling of Vik. In modern Danish the word "vik" is still used with its original meaning.
In English the word wick is no longer used but is found in place names - Wick in Scotland is a town on an inlet from the sea.
Ihe "er" on the end of the word is merely the plural. as "s" is in English. Vikings in English - Vikinger in Danish
VERY large part of this article stolen by dick eastman blog
http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_ge
The Editor Guy
A former Svensson.
We watched part of a very interesting program on May 20, 2000 on a "PBS' Nova program. It was titled "The Vikings".
It created the thought behins this story of our ancestors that may have been Vikings!
http://www.familyforest.com/captain
http://familyforest.wordpress.com
Kate from buy to let mortgages
However, people believe that Boudica was a crazed woman who merely hated the Romans. Upon the death of her husband, the king, the Romans took over, beat her, and PUBLICLY RAPED her two daughters. Because anyone else would've sat on the sidelines smiling. Not!
Mark from best buy to let remortgage deals