Varying fines for offences 'unfair': Adam Sage spent a day in a Leeds court with magistrates operating the unit fines system Offenders must not be sentenced for their past history
Tuesday 04 May 1993
Yes, he admitted that he had been over the limit by nine milligrams and yes, he realised that he would lose his licence. But he had been depressed because he was splitting up with his wife and, anyway, had only drunk four shandies. The stipendiary explained that she had no choice but to ban him for 12 months.
Neither did she have any discretion over the fine. The offence was worth 15 units on the scale of seriousness and Peter, a council officer, had a disposable weekly income of pounds 15. The two figures were multiplied to give a penalty of pounds 235.
Peter had not been in court for the previous case, but it would have have interested him. Paul, a part-time DJ, had been caught seven milligrammes over the limit after drinking, he said, two shandies and a pint of bitter at a nightclub. Again, it was a 15-unit offence but Paul earned only about pounds 40 a week, giving him a disposable income of pounds 4. His penalty was a year's ban and a pounds 60 fine.
Two almost identical offences, and two vastly different fines, which, say critics of the Criminal Justice Act, is manifestly unfair. Supporters say that as the first defendant had a stable job and the second did not, the impact of the fines will be the same on both men. This, they say, is justice.
Earlier in the day, three brothers and a friend had appeared in court charged with buying 24 cans of lager knowing it had been stolen from their local off-licence on the outskirts of Leeds. After they had all pleaded guilty, the prosecutor said they had previous convictions for other petty offences. But the stipendiary disregarded this information, as she is obliged to do under the new Act.
None of the four defendants had a job, giving all of them the miniumum disposable income of pounds 4 a week. The offence was worth 10 units, meaning a penalty of pounds 40 for each of them.
Next was a driver in his 20s from Harrogate. He had been stopped by police and asked to produce an MoT. Not having one, he paid a friend pounds 25 for a forgery, which he knew to be stolen. An engineer with a disposable income of pounds 18, he was fined 15 units for receiving stolen goods and 15 for driving without insurance, leaving a penalty of pounds 540.
- 2 California man brutally beat 82-year-old Sikh grandfather he mistook for 'one of those people'
- 3 School kitchen manager 'fired from Colorado school for giving hungry students free lunches'
- 5 Charles Kennedy 'had better judgement drunk than many sober politicians' says Ian Hislop
California man brutally beat 82-year-old Sikh grandfather he mistook for 'one of those people'
Amber Peat: Body found in search for missing 13-year-old who left house after argument with her parents
School kitchen manager 'fired from Colorado school for giving hungry students free lunches'
Isis executes three gay men by dangling them from top of 100ft building and letting go
Alton Towers crash: Four guests seriously injured as Smiler ride carriages collide
Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school cancer vaccination
Migrants in Kos: Photos show real tragedy after Brits abroad complain of 'awkward' holidays
British tourists complain that impoverished boat migrants are making holidays 'awkward' in Kos
Michael Gove determined to scrap the Human Rights Act – even if Scotland retains it
Threat to scrap Human Rights Act could see UK follow Nazi example, warns UN official
Church of England 'one generation away from extinction' after dramatic loss of followers
£40000 - £47000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A 3rd Line Virtualisation / Sto...
£26000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A successful national service f...
£15000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an opportunity to join ...
£17500 - £20000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: We currently require an experie...