Whitehall dampens hopes for Irish talks
Donald Macintyre writes political sketches for The Independent, having been Jerusalem correspondent since 2004, covering Israel and the Occupied Territories, as well as travelling for the paper to Iraq, Turkey, Jordan, Libya and Egypt. As Political Editor and then Chief Political Commentator, he previously covered the John Major and early Tony Blair era. He has written for the Daily Express, Sunday Times, Times and Sunday Telegraph, and Sunday Correspondent. He is the author of Mandelson and the Making of New Labour (2000).
Tuesday 23 November 1993
Although the Irish government still has 3 December pencilled in for the summit, senior Whitehall sources acknowledged for the first time the possibility that the summit could even take place shortly after the European Council meeting a week later.
The difficulty about fixing a date will be taken as evidence of the delicacy of discussions between the two governments - intensified last week by the leak of a draft position paper from Dublin seeking British recognition of the goal of Irish unity. Whitehall emphasised that the summit, while important, was part of a process that would continue after the Dublin meeting.
Meanwhile, Lord Tebbit, the former Conservative Party chairman, last night sound a pointed warning to Mr Major. He said the Irish government would not be satisfied 'with anything that does not advance the cause of the alternative Union - that of a United Ireland'.
Sir Patrick Mayhew, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, yesterday strongly rejected 'this idea that the governments are separating in their positions'.
Mr Reynolds told journalists on Sunday that he saw little hope for inter-party talks unless they took place in an atmosphere of peace and so could include Sinn Fein.
But Sir Patrick said that Mr Reynolds had, in a television interview, 'made it very clear that there was no conflict between these two processes' - of promoting inter- party talks and seeking an end to
Unionist politicians expressed outrage last night at confirmation from the Army that many soldiers in Northern Ireland have abandoned their helmets for berets as part of a policy to 'soften' their public image. The Rev Ian Paisley, leader of the Democratic Unionist Party, said the move was 'only the tip of the iceberg' of concessions negotiated between London and Dublin. The Army said that if soldiers came under fire they would put their helmets back on.
Diving in at the deep end is no excuse for shirking the style stakes
- 2 Loom bands: Bids for dress made from colourful rubber reach almost £154,000 on eBay
- 3 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
- 4 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 5 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
£50000 - £70000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Business Analyst Consultant (Fina...
competitive: Progressive Recruitment: My client, a FTSE 100 organisation are u...
£300 - £350 per day + competitive: Orgtel: My client, a leading bank, is curre...