Wife to fight US tycoon's London divorce
Friday 28 July 1995
Katina Dart, whose husband makes his money from manufacturing polystyrene containers for fast food restaurants, made it clear that whatever the English High Court awards her as a financial settlement, she will go to her local court in Michigan and lay claim to half his fortune.
Outside court, she denied his allegations of unreasonable behaviour and said: "I do not regard myself as being properly divorced." Mrs Dart, 37, had fought through the courts in vain to stop her husband ending their 15-year marriage in London.
Last week, the Court of Appeal was told that Mr Dart was alleging adultery and accusing his wife of refusing to have sex with him. The adultery claim was dropped yesterday.
Mrs Dart's QC, James Munby, told Mr Justice Johnson she opposed the granting of a divorce decree by "this court". He added: "My client says the court in Ingham county, Michigan, is the only court that has any jurisdiction in this matter." She would not seek to have her husband cross-examined on his written evidence, and would not give evidence herself.
Mr Dart, also 37, was granted a decree nisi because of his wife's alleged unreasonable behaviour. The judge said he was satisfied the marriage had irretrievably broken down. He certified that arrangements for the welfare of the couple's children, William, 12, and Ariana, nine, who live with their mother in Michigan, were "excellent". The question of how much money Mr Dart should pay his wife and children - he is already providing for them voluntarily - was adjourned to be heard in private.
Mr Dart married Katina Scofess in Lansing, Ingham Co, in October 1980. The family moved to England in 1993. The Court of Appeal's ruling last week that the English court was the appropriate forum for the divorce was based on Mr Dart's "habitual residence" here for more than 12 months. After yesterday's 10-minute hearing, Mr Dart refused to comment.
Mrs Dart said: "I was born in America, married in America, live in America and came to England in 1993 on a temporary basis. I am still an American citizen. I think it is so unfair he gets a divorce here. He is not a British citizen. He does not pay taxes here. This case would be better heard in the United States."
Her solicitor, Margaret Bennett, said there was still a contest over where the financial settlement should take place. "Divorce settlements in England have been based on a wife's needs, not on a fair division of property as in the United States.
"This has led to the 'millionaire's defence' where there is one law for mega-rich men and another for their wives and everyone else. This case could be the watershed we have been waiting for to give a fair share of the family assets to the wife and not just provide for her needs."
- 3 The enemy within: People who hear voices in their heads are being encouraged to talk back
- 4 British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford faces execution by firing squad in Indonesia
'We would evict Queen from Buckingham Palace and allocate her council house,' say Greens
French court convicts three over homophobic tweets, in case hailed as a 'significant victory' by LGBT rights campaigners
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British Muslim school children suffering a backlash of abuse following Paris attacks
Islamic history is full of free thinkers - but recent attempts to suppress critical thought are verging on the absurd
30,000 reasons why the rhetoric on immigrants claiming benefits can stop now
£38000 - £42000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the UK's best performing...
£35000 - £43000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Our award-winning client is one...
£15000 - £21000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This leading provider of Atlas ...
£18000 - £20000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Opportunity to join established...