World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

At last, Blair is free to 'do God' – and America loves it

By Leonard Doyle in Washington

Tony Blair greets the First Lady Michelle Obama during the National Prayer Breakfast

AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Tony Blair greets the First Lady Michelle Obama during the National Prayer Breakfast

Tony Blair gave an extraordinary speech about the global importance of religion yesterday, telling an audience which included the newly-inaugurated President, Barack Obama, that faith should be restored "to its rightful place, as the guide to our world and its future."

The former prime minister also said he believed the 21st century would be "poorer in spirit" and "meaner in ambition" if it was not "under the guardianship of faith in God." He had been invited by President Obama to lead the prestigious US National Prayer Breakfast, a spectacular event in the ballroom of the Washington Hilton Hotel.

Mr Blair also managed to rain on Gordon Brown's parade, meeting the President before any European leader. He dashed ahead of the Prime Minister and other political heavyweights, including Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and Vladimir Putin, to lay on the hands and tell the President: "It is fitting at this extraordinary moment in your country's history that we hear that call to action; and we pray that in acting we do God's work and follow God's will."

During Mr Blair's 10 years as prime minister, his chief spin doctor Alastair Campbell famously answered any religious questions from journalists with the retort: "We don't do God." But free from the shackles of leadership, Mr Blair embraced his faith and even ended his speech with "God bless you all."

He didn't just get the bragging rights of being first in line – Mr Brown will only meet the President when he travels to London in early April – he got an opportunity to lobby for his own role in a big US push for Middle East peace.

Mr Blair also delivered a homily about faith and religion, even telling the assembled political leaders of his first spiritual awakening, when he was 10 years old. "That day, my father – at the young age of 40 – had suffered a serious stroke," he told the audience. "His life hung in the balance." He described being sent to school where his teacher knelt and prayed with him.

"Now my father was a militant atheist," Mr Blair said. "Before we prayed, I thought I should confess this. 'I'm afraid my father doesn't believe in God,' I said. 'That doesn't matter,' my teacher replied. 'God believes in him. He loves him without demanding or needing love in return.'"

Mr Blair's homily went down like milk and honey. Americans proudly wear their faith on their sleeves and Washington is a city where politicians and policy-makers are often found at early morning prayer meetings. And Mr Blair may be on to a good thing with Mr Obama, who has embraced the religious community more than any recent Democratic leader. The one Bush programme he is holding on to is his "faith-based" initiative now renamed as "faith and neighborhood partnerships.'

At yesterday's breakfast, the former prime minister, who championed a war in Iraq that many religious leaders condemned as immoral, proclaimed himself a supporter of Mr Obama. "It is an honour to be here, a particular honour to be with you Mr President." Mr Blair said. "The world participated in the celebration of your election. Now the hard work begins. And now, also we should be as steadfast for you in the hard work as in the celebration."

While Mr Blair was plotting strategy for invading Iraq, Mr Obama, then a political unknown, went out on a limb to condemn plans for the war. He famously declared that he was not opposed to war but opposed to "dumb wars" and won the election largely on a promise of bringing the troops home from Iraq.

In his first few days as President, he banned torture and ordered the closure of Guantanamo within a year.

Yesterday Mr Obama listened politely while one of the biggest supporters of the war declared: "You don't need cheerleaders but partners; not spectators but supporters. The truest friends are those still around when the going is toughest. We offer you our friendship today. We will work with you to make your presidency one that shapes our destiny to the credit of America and of the world. Mr President, we salute you and wish you well.'

Mr Blair who received a Presidential Medal of Freedom from Mr Bush just before he left office, did not get an opportunity for a private chat with President Obama yesterday.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
Blair has no faith
[info]slyfas wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 12:27 am (UTC)
This cacophony about 'faith' and 'religion' is a mere obfuscation from the real issue regarding a man that has a lot to answer for for the invasion of Iraq and all those lies about terrorism. Since Blair and Bush stepped out of office, we do not hear all those terror alerts -red, orange, yellow etc and yet we are safer now than we would have ever been under their watch.

I hope Obama is smart enough to understand that Blair is only using religion to cajole the Americans and warm his way to the lawns of the White House. He is a shameless self-seeker who is ready to do business with anybody even if they do not share his political ideology. How can someone who claimed to be a 'close' friend of George Bush now turn up wanting to be Obama's friend? Damn all hypocrites!
Blair is the best leader we've had
[info]zxcvbnmxxx wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 08:23 pm (UTC)
You guys who diss Blair have no brain. He is the best leader we've had and is responsible for peace in Northern Ireland, the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq and the bringing of peace to Kosovo.

You should get over your stupid views and live in the real world - he changed things for the better and had the guts to make decisions - you lot wouldn't know how to make a difficult decision if it smacked you in the face.
Re: Blair is the best leader we've had - [info]red_demo_dragon - Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 12:11 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Blair is the best leader we've had - [info]famulla - Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Blair is the best leader we've had - [info]blairsupporter - Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 02:08 pm (UTC) Expand
Blair's God
[info]bahrain_bhoy wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 12:40 am (UTC)
I find it extraordinary that Tony Blair is referrenced on matters of faith. He seems to be devoid of some of the basic goodness and qualities that should be found in a person who holds faith in God as a central part of their life.

He lacks humility. He seems unable to acknolwledge wrong doing. He covets fame and furtune.

He seems confused on his own route to God through the catholic church, having voted opposite to the views of the church in his time in parliament and certainly does not seem to be willing to come out publicly to clarify his change in belief. Why would this be? He couldn't avoid it when he is now so publicly involved in talking of faith so the arguement of keeping these views private don't seem to wash.

My suspicion is that these views would put him at odds with the company he wants to keep.

I wonder if he felt that God was with the innocent people of Iraq, or was his God the one who told him to go in?

Peace Envoy?
[info]simon_webb_nz wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 12:49 am (UTC)
This man's hypocracy knows no bounds. He couldn't wait to declare war on Iraq for reasons he knew to be spurious, and now he is passing himself off as a peace envoy? Does the duplicity not occur to him? Surely he must understand that one cannot wage war on a nation and then expect to be taken seriosly as a peace envoy. If that's his religion he can keep it because it certainly is'nt mine. It is worth remembering that Jesus saved his harshest words for those hypocrates who claimed to serve God.
great photo
[info]laconico wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 01:23 am (UTC)
he's just about to go for her neck.
Praise the (christian,muslim and jewish) Lord.

Let's hang with the optimism whatever the language
Re: great photo
[info]latha_rajamani wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:36 am (UTC)
The photo looks as if he is going to kiss her u know where! Why was this photo allowed to be published? Surely there would have been other dignified photos that could have been shown.
Re: great photo - [info]laconico - Friday, 6 February 2009 at 10:10 am (UTC) Expand
Blair has blood on his hands
[info]chadi_salim wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 01:37 am (UTC)
Is the former prime minster now guided by moral , why wasn't he guided by religion and moral during his priemeriship? perhaps because it stood in the way between him and his personal and destructive views. His views are at collision course with the new administration, as Obama clearly said he was against the war, and it was immoral, and since Blair has blood on his hands then he is not welcome by the new President
No Shock and no Awe here!
[info]haywardsward wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 01:51 am (UTC)
The Poodle who, along with The Faux Texan consulted The Lord before visiting Shock and Awe on the Land of Iraq. Followed by an illegal and immoral invasion. Oh so Old Testament.
I presume he chose to turn Catholic because he can just pop off to confession, do the mea culpa, say a few Hail Marys or our Fathers as a penance and then his conscience is clear. That is if he ever had a conscience concerning the Iraq Fiasco.
I'd like to hear this quote in full context
[info]trypr wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:44 am (UTC)
"to its rightful place, as the guide to our world and its future."

Quite honestly, who's faith? what faith? the oh so successful guiding faith he shared with George Bush? the inevitable implication that *faith*, even in part, "guided" Blair's decision making over the Iraq invasion?

As someone who is not a committed atheist it *disgusts* me that the man can be so brazenly conceited. This country was erroneously convinced to go to war on the basis of alleged substance of a real threat to the people of the Middle East, Europe and ultimately, the UK. And now he talks of faith and derides the approach of our political system to secular government?

I think faith is a personal matter; you cannot look to something that so divides us all, to guide "our world and it's future".
hypocrisy know no bounds
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:54 am (UTC)
Tony has already secured his place in history as Tony B Liar, war criminal and one of the most untrustworthy politicians Britain ever spawned. Yes, his hypocrisy know no bounds.
Tony Blair
[info]loxton wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 02:56 am (UTC)
Is there no end to what this this man will do or say to keep himself on the world stage? I'm embarrassed for him.
[info]explodingbadger wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 03:32 am (UTC)
Absolutely nauseating. If he IS a Christian he should be trembling in fear of what will happen when he meets Saint Peter. Hopefully the souls of the dead Iraqis will be waiting for him there too.
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:21 am (UTC)
A major point about Christianity that is largely forgotten by Christians is that if you sin against someone you should promptly apologise to them and ask for forgiveness. Otherwise the sin will be held against you. Tony is in the uneviable situtation of having to personally ask everyone in Iraq and Afghanistan for forgiveness. That should keep him busy until Judgement Day.
God has damned Blair
[info]baboulas wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:41 am (UTC)
Blair can rightfully claim the title of Chief Clown of the UK. He has singlehandedly destroyed any chance Labor had to create lasting change for the better. Sort of like his counterpart Bush did for the Republicans in the US.

His role of supreme emissary of the West in Palestine-Israel has been ridiculous. He will live in infamy. No matter how much he tries to paint himself as God fearing and born again, he will be reduced to nothing else than a has-been. Sort of, wow, his buddy Bush.

Long live secular thinking.
Blair does God is a frightening statement.
[info]cazz66 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:44 am (UTC)
I felt chilled reading this story. Tony Blair is one of the least admirable public figures of our age.
A Disgrace to the Human Race
[info]sultanofscally wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:45 am (UTC)
Murder, torture, massacre, unrivaled arrogance. What an obnoxious stench, how do you sleep Mr Blair?
Tony Blair's visit to Washington
[info]john_shay wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:30 am (UTC)
I am amazed that Tony Blair who lied so gracelessly about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq and took his country and the world into a war that has killed thousands of civilians now hides behind his god.

John Shayler
Vancouver, Canada

Bloody Liars and saints.
[info]gaius_godd wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:35 am (UTC)
Religion should have no part in public afffairs. Religion is a private matter. People who use religion as a political tool are despicable. Wolves in sheep's clothing still smell like the vicious predators they are, even if the wool is pulled over their eyes. Some words are cheap and ephemeral, and some actions are real and enduring. We ahould judge a person by his actions not his words. Saints do not wage wars and there is a big difference between a saint and a poseur.


Bearing false witness
[info]mmaddox wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:43 am (UTC)
Proves that not only patriotism but also God is the last refuge of the scoundrels. The man is seriously unhinged. Steve Bell's and Martin Rowson's depictions of him in the Guardian were spot on. (oops, sorry, am I allowed to mention the Guardian here?)
Blair's God?
[info]monquibiz wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:49 am (UTC)
Faith in God. No problem. Who's God? Big problem.
Blair does God
[info]monquibiz wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 05:50 am (UTC)
Blair: Faith in God? No problem. Faith in which god? Big problem.
Re: Blair does God
[info]singingbird85 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 01:03 pm (UTC)
They say that 'Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel'Well obviously Blair has no patriotism because he is the biggest Traitor to his Country ever known so he resorts to Religion with all the showbusiness falseness which just shows what a ghastly man he is.
Also 'the Devil can cite scripture for his own purpose', so says the Bard.
Re: Blair does God - [info]fronswa - Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 09:11 pm (UTC) Expand
Was he praying for the collateral?
[info]gondorplace wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:17 am (UTC)
In 2 months there will be a 10-year anniversary of the NATO raids on Serbia and Kosovo. Certainly not of the same magnitude as say, Iraq, 'only' around 5,000 of collateral bodies, of which 1,500 children, destroyed economy, thousands of innocent people dead of subsequent diseases caused by depleted uranium and many more starving in the middle of Europe, living in the country without capability to feed its children.

For as long as those 10 million people remember you, Tony, your prayers are not going anywhere.
no faith
[info]duckhorn wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:48 am (UTC)
Mr. Blair swept to power on the tsunami of "change" and changed nothing. If Mr. O does the same, then we're ALL screwed.
[info]abdulbasit2 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:49 am (UTC)
Judas reborn!!!
How do you define your God?
[info]pokerknave wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:58 am (UTC)
The Judeo-Christian God seems like a very flexible entity. You can love everyone as you do yourself, yet, kill hundreds of thousands of children for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

This god chooses certain people over others and give them the right over life and death. This god will give you 76 or 72 virgins, if you blow yourself up killing a load of other people while doing so.

Maybe I have been wrong about the validity of this super being but I am not sure...
Re: How do you define your God?
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 08:22 pm (UTC)
The Jewish and Christian gods (elohim is a plural noun for the Jews, and the fiction of the Trinity did not come into being until the Council of Nicea in the fourth century) are as bloodthirsty and loathesome as the god of the mythological Mohammad--who wed and bedded an eight year old girl. The bibles of each religion are plagarisms from far older texts, and the tales in each are not proven by science, archeology or other inquiries (There is no Egyptian record of an Joseph nor of Hebrews being in Egypt before the second century BCE; Nazareth did not exist until after the first century CE; the first known Koran does not appear until "Mohammad" had been dead nearly 200 years). Until civilization ends the evil stranglehold of religion no one is free or safe from those who call for crusades (be it Urban II at Claremont and the subsequent bloodbath launched against European Jews, Greek Orthodox in Turkey, or Arabs and Jews in Jersualem; to the fatwahs and jihads of todays radical Moslems in Iran and elsewhere) and are willing to destroy schools and hospitals and murder children (as did the Israelis when firing into the Gaza--a land originally under the territorial rule of Egypt), etc.
Interestingly enough, Mr. Blair knows how to play it...
[info]gus077 wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:58 am (UTC)
It seems that Mr. Blair has been playing it well being a supporter of the "War on Terror" and "War against Mass Destrcutive Weapons" that were not found in Iraq. His most recent adopted role is the the peacemaker one. I just wonder how could he juggle too many conflicting roles!!!

G.A
Grooaannnn!
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:59 am (UTC)
This unscrupulous opportunistic prat is at it again. Can't *anybody* put him down once and for all?
Btw, did Mrs Wonderone collect any freebies, or did she (unusually) leave empty handed?
Wow
[info]idrchitecture wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 03:22 pm (UTC)
What an uncompromising response ! Everyone here who's read this article seems to have come to the same conclusion. What does the man think he is doing? ? It's not only nausiating and and hypocritcal but embarrassing and patronising. I just hope the weather in London gets so incredibly extreme that no one is able to leave their house for a month. Namely the 'powerful'. I think the 'powerful' need to be cooped up for a long time to be afforded any perspective
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date