Battle for Oswald’s sniper window
Tuesday 24 February 2009
Latest in Americas
On Facebook
From the blogs
Online House Hunter: England’s most romantic places
Our Online House Hunter goes in search of romance this Valentine's Day...
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Children Of Alcoholics week: One million children may just be the tip of the iceberg
Children Of Alcoholics week starts today. So, what are the aims for Nacoa during this important week...
A legal battle over the ownership of the “sniper’s perch” – the window where Lee Harvey Oswald propped his mail-order telescopic rifle, before firing on President John F Kennedy – end up in a Dallas courtroom yesterday.
The history of the window is as tortured as the competing conspiracy theories about the Kennedy assassination. Thankfully, District Judge Gena Slaughter takes it as given that Oswald fired the three shots that rang out at 12.30pm on 22 November 1963 and killed the president. What she must decide is which of two windows – removed at separate times from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository – is the sniper’s perch. Once ownership is established, the window is expected to be worth more than $3m (£2m).
Caruth Byrd, 67, says he inherited the window in 1986 from his father, Colonel D Harold Byrd, who once owned the Dallas building. Fearing that the window would be stolen by souvenir hunters, the colonel had his handyman remove the eight-pane window six weeks after the assassination. It was then framed and hung on the wall of his Dallas mansion.
But Aubrey Mayhew, 81, a Kennedy memorabilia collector, says Mr Byrd took the wrong window – the one from the south-west corner and not the south-east corner where Oswald fired the fatal shots. Mr Mayhew says he has the correct window removed in the early 1970s.
Mr Byrd, who put his window up for auction on eBay two years ago was unable to get a fair market value because of the conflicting claims.
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 5 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all


Comments