Bush's voluntary targets for emissions fail to win support
Saturday 29 September 2007
Latest in Americas
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
Defiant as ever, President Bush remained isolated on global warming when he refused to accept the need for specific limits on emissions from the world's biggest polluting nations.
Mr Bush instead called on the world's largest producers of CO2 to set a voluntary goal for reducing the gasses that are causing the planet to heat up. If there was progress, it was that he didn't exempt the US from the list.
"By setting this goal, we acknowledge there is a problem, and by setting this goal, we commit ourselves to doing something about it," Mr Bush said in a speech ending two days of talks at a White House- sponsored climate change conference.
"We share a common responsibility: to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while keeping our eco-nomies growing."
European participants denounced his remarks as "deeply cynical". One delegate described his address as naked attempt to derail the efforts of 80 heads of state at this week's UN summit on climate change.
"What has become clear is just how isolated the US has become, there was no support for the Bush approach," said John Ashton the UK's special advisor on climate change.
"A voluntary approach to reducing greenhouse gases is hardly likely to be more effective than voluntary speed limits on the roads."
The US policy did not win any support and even developing countries, such as China, India, and Brazil now support mandatory limits on carbon and said so.
The meeting which drew representatives from 16 nations saw Mr Bush emphasise green technologies to tackle global warming.
Members of Mr Bush's administration are now on the verge of breaking ranks with his policy. Hank Paulson, US Treasury Secretary, said in New York this week that the world faced "very, very bad outcomes" in the future if nothing was done to reduce carbon emissions.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments