How a botched execution revived death penalty debate in America
Confidence in lethal injections is dwindling, thanks to cases such as that of Romell Broom. David Usborne reports
AP
Lethal injection is the preferred method of execution in many states, but a moratorium has been imposed by some since 2007
The gruesome botching of an execution in Ohio on Tuesday, when technicians tried but failed to find a vein in a Death Row inmate through which to administer the required mortal fluids, is casting a fresh spotlight on the flaws in America's system of capital punishment system at a time when public support for it may already be flagging.
Lawyers for Romell Broom, convicted in the 1984 rape and killing of a 14-year-old girl abducted in Cleveland, were successful in blocking the state's plans to have a second go at dispatching him by lethal injection in three days' time, for the surreal reason that one week is not enough time for him to recover from his near-death. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order yesterday, effective for 10 days.
The Broom case is one among several that in recent weeks have galvanised anti-death penalty campaigners. Others have included a grandmother on death row in Texas, Linda Carty, who, though from St Kitts originally, is of British nationality, and of another Texas inmate who, it now turns out, was tried by a judge who was romantically involved with prosecutor.
On Thursday a Texas court rejected the latest appeal by lawyers for 50-year-old Carty, claiming that her defence at trial had been sufficient, and taking her several steps closer to the death chamber. Earlier this month, supporters of Carty broadcast a message to the British public to help her from a loud speaker on a plinth in Trafalgar Square. "Please don't let me die here," said Carty, who maintains she was framed.
"If Texas goes ahead with her execution, Linda will die because she had a bad lawyer, and because the British government was not given the chance to help her at a time when it could have made a difference," Sally Rowen, legal director of the London-based anti-death penalty group Reprieve said yesterday. "Last week the British public listened to Linda from the fourth plinth, but the Fifth Circuit [the US appeals court] doesn't seem to be listening at all."
Broom's case does little to dispel the idea that Carty's end would not necessarily even be a peaceful one. The 53-year-old reportedly tried to assist technicians in finding a vein, at one point lying on his side and sliding the tube up and down his forearm and flexing his fingers. But his assistance did not help. At 2.49pm, according to a timeline compiled by the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Broom "wiped his face with a tissue", and "appeared to be crying". Eventually, the team at the so-called "death house" gave up.
Defence lawyers contended that seven days was insufficient time for their client to overcome the horror of what had occurred. "Even if it never goes away, I think it's wrong to try to do it again so quickly in these circumstances," Tim Sweeney said. A federal judge has meanwhile ordered that Broom be allowed to give a legal deposition on Monday in a broader case brought by the Ohio public defenders' office challenging the practice of lethal injection.
Lethal injection is overwhelmingly the preferred method for carrying out executions. Executions were put on hold nationwide in 2007, however, while the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of death by lethal injection. While the top court eventually ruled that executions could resume, issues over the use of lethal injection mean they are still on hold in several states.
Confidence in the effectiveness and reliability of the death penalty has been eroding since the beginning of the decade, when Illinois introduced a moratorium that still remains in place. Some states, including New Jersey and New Mexico, have passed laws banning the practice, and support appears to be slipping. Yet a majority of Americans remain opposed to any repeal.
Advocates of an end to executions in the US have had moments to cheer, most recently in August, when the Supreme Court for the first time issued a ruling allowing lower courts to re-open cases where inmates on Death Row seem to have new evidence. It did so in the case of Troy Anthony Davis. Since his conviction for killing a policeman in Georgia, seven prosecution witnesses have recanted their testimonies and appeals for a pardon have come from Jimmy Carter and the Pope.
But as they make steps forward, just as quickly they suffer setbacks. Thus although Charles Dean Hood, also on Texas' death row, was granted a last-minute reprieve in June 2008 when a former district attorney confirmed reports he had had an affair with the judge at his trial, the Texas Court of Appeals this week denied a request for a retrial saying that his defence team had raised the issue too late.
"This decision ... will only add to the perception that justice is skewed in Texas," said Andrea Keilen, executive director of Texas Defender Service, adding that it appears that "obvious and outrageous violations of the constitution are acceptable in death penalty cases". Romell Broom would doubtless agree that his treatment qualified as cruel and unusual. It is not yet clear whether the American legal system – and American public – will ever take the same view.
Ordeal by injection
*5.08am Broom wakes up.
*8.07am Chemicals are delivered to the death house.
*9.31am Preparations on hold while court weighs a last-minute appeal.
*12.28pm Broom eats creamed chicken, biscuits, green beans, potatoes, salad and grape drink.
*12.48pm Court says it will not review the appeal. Execution scheduled to begin at 1:30pm.
*1.24pm First round of lethal drugs is destroyed.
*1.31pm Replacements delivered.
*2.01pm Medical team enters holding cell and begins trying to insert IVs.
*2.30pm Unable to find a usable vein, team leaves cell to take a break.
*2.42pm Team members try again.
*2.44pm Prisons director Terry Collins orders another break.
*2.49pm Broom wipes his face with a tissue, appears to be crying.
*2.57pm Broom asks that his attorney be allowed to watch.
*Around 3pm, Broom's attorney asks Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Moyer to stop the execution on the grounds that Broom is suffering cruel and unusual punishment.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
In the year 2009 it is hard to fathom that any rational person would consider the account above as being a justifiable way to treat a human being - because regardless of the hang 'em high brigade's protestations Mr Broom IS a human being. He is a human being with family who do not deserve to have society exact its revenge on them. Execution is never something done to one man or woman in isolation. The ripple effects on that person's family, that person's children, are eternal. Before the US is so quick to plunge the needle maybe it should consider if it truly wishes to be responsible for the damaged adults it will make of an executed man or woman's innocent children. The death penalty must end, or society will forever reap the catastrophic consequences of it.
Maybe it is because of the heinous crime he commited and the massive ammount of pain he has caused. Why not let this be repeated over and over again to this beast. He gets a painless death but the pain will continue for the family and friends of the victim.
The fact that you wish for this torture to be repeated over and over I would venture says more about the fractured state of your mind than anything else. Quite scary to realize there are those with sadistic tendencies who would have our governments legitimize such backward thinking.
We plan to deliver the petition signatures to Perry at his office during the 10th Annual March to Abolish the Death Penalty on October 24 in Austin.
This debate isn't really about the death penalty. It's about which method of imposing it makes us feel the least guilty. Never mind whether you're for or against capital punishment; why not campaign for the most effective method of ending a human life quickly to be used, irrespective of mess? It's not as if these guys get open-coffin funerals anyway, is it? From the felon's point of view, at least it's quick, and he isn't going to be around for the horrendous mopping-up. And from everybody else's viewpoint, it really brings home to us that somebody has been killed. By us. On purpose.
Discuss.
WRONG. There have been plenty of cases of people falling vastly longer distances and surviving. I'm not even going to look any up to provide you with proof, you can do that yourself.
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
Lord Bradley UKingdom
Machine gun to the head.OR
10 minutes with victim's families, provided with machetes or penknives OR
Crucifixion.
That should cause a stop to at least a few murders in future....
The only sure way to stop crime is detection,no potential criminal sets out on a crime if he knows he is certain to be detected.
If the Death Penalty had been available to the courts in the United Kingdom in the seventies, both the Birmingham six, and Giuldford four would have been Hanged.At that time,in both cases,the convictions were considered sound,years later their convictions turned out to be anything but sound and they were released, after suffering a grave injustice,to carry on with there shattered lives.
The criminal justice system is in the USA is bad. A large number of states have elected judges who respond to popular sentiment. And once a verdict is in and the appeal period over, judges and DAs in many states ignore clear evidence of innocence.
The criminal justice system is in the USA is bad. The criminal justice system in Texas is monstrous.
this is what i call justice!!! when a judge turns out to be corrupt then may god help the rest.
Truth is...punishment of any form is both barbaric (unintelligent) and unusual (not common), as everything else in this abode follows another direction...especially humans...as we are "leaven", beings of increase, rather than destruction.
Humans need remedy mistakes...and go on to enjoy prosperity. Every individual was born perfect...perfect for what surrounded them.
One of the remedies is death for crimes that deserve it.
Humans are not born with equal moral values, most have good genes, some have bad.
Moral values are obtained by nature and nurture - some cannot ever be corrected and for the sake of society they must be destroyed. We cannot afford to go soft on such matters. Life is hard and unfair - that is life...
(relevant portion of) Amendment V: ...nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb...
Full text of Amendment 5:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Just do a Google search of
cutdown surgery
and you will find it
Almost without exception, if the full facts were presented, there would be no groundswell of support to start a movement.
Troy Davis: Both sides need to be told
Dudley Sharp, contact info below
Anyone interested in justice will demand a fair, thorough look at both sides of this or any case. Here is the side that the pro Troy Davis faction is, intentionally, not presenting.
(1) Davis v Georgia, Georgia Supreme Court, 3/17/08
Full ruling http://www.gasupreme.us/pdf/s07a1758.pd
Summary http://www.gasupreme.us/op_summaries/ma
" . . . the majority finds that 'most of the witnesses to the crime who have allegedly recanted have merely stated that they now do not feel able to identify the shooter.' "One of the affidavits 'might actually be read so as to confirm trial testimony that Davis was the shooter.' "
The murder occurred in 1989.
(2) "THE PAROLE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION OF THE TROY ANTHONY DAVIS CASE" , 9/22/08, http://www.pap.state.ga.us/opencms/open
"After an exhaustive review of all available information regarding the Troy Davis case and after considering all possible reasons for granting clemency, the Board has determined that clemency is not warranted."
"The Board has now spent more than a year studying and considering this case. As a part of its proceedings, the Board gave Davis� attorneys an opportunity to present every witness they desired to support their allegation that there is doubt as to Davis� guilt. The Board heard each of these witnesses and questioned them closely. In addition, the Board has studied the voluminous trial transcript, the police investigation report and the initial statements of all witnesses. The Board has also had certain physical evidence retested and Davis interviewed."
(3) A detailed review of the extraordinary consideration that Davis was given for all of his claims,
by Chatham County District Attorney Spencer Lawton http://tinyurl.com/46c73l
Troy Davis' claims are undermined, revealing the dishonesty of the Davis advocates . Look, particularly, at pages 4-7, which show the reasoned, thoughtful and generous reviews of Davis' claims, as well a how despicable the one sided cynical pro Troy Davis effort is.
(4) Officer Mark Allen MacPhail: The family of murdered Officer MacPhail fully believes that Troy Davis murdered their loved one and that the evidence is supportive of that opinion. http://www.markallenmacphail.com/
Not simply an emotional and understandable plea for justice, but a detailed factual review of the case.
(5) "Death and Dying", by Cliff Green, LIKE THE DEW, 7/22/09,
http://likethedew.com/2009/07/22/de
Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com 713-622-5491,
Houston, Texas
Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS, VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.
A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.
That's one case where they surely forget to ask "what would Jesus do?".
In fact, according to their scriptures, we know what he did. He forgave.
The blood lust in some of the comments here is disturbing. The state has an obligation to protect citizens from psychopathic killers, but there is no obligation to do so by killing them. Locking them up is enough.
Therefore, killing is a choice. Wanting to exercise that choice makes you a killer in your heart, even if you delegate the actual business of killing to someone else. What a burden to carry.
That may be over simplistic.
Jesus may forgive in certain cases, but he's more likely to opt for old testament option of the eye-of-an-eye, life-for-a-life.
Remeber it is prophecised that the returning Jesus will be the warrior who will slay the anti-Christ, not just sit back and forgive the anti-Christ...
In addition to the ethics of this practice, we hear of cases time and time again where mistakes have undoubtedly been made and the case against the suspect has been anything but fair.
Considering this latest cockup and the blatant fallibility of the American judicial system (and I am by no means maintaining the Uk system is perfect), the death penalty moratorium become a permanent ban and should be extended to all states.
Period, end of story.