World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

If you’re looking for gobbledy-goop, just ask Gwyneth

Actress dispenses lifestyle advice on personal website

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

The contents of Gwyneth Paltrow's advice website have been dismissed as an unprecedented example of celebrity hubris

AP

The contents of Gwyneth Paltrow's advice website have been dismissed as an unprecedented example of celebrity hubris

She may boast a rockstar husband and successful Hollywood career, but Gwyneth Paltrow is learning the hard way that celebrity alone does not qualify you to dispense day-to-day advice to the hardpressed modern housewife.

The Oscar-winning actress, who is famed for her exotic exercise regime and macrobiotic lifestyle, is facing a fierce critical backlash after attempting to re-launch herself as a New Age version of America’s domestic guru, Martha Stewart, with a new lifestyle website called Goop. Yes Goop.

In it, she intends to dispense tips about food, exercise and parenting, together with humorous anecdotes from life on the frontline of showbusiness.

Yet despite Paltrow’s experience as both wife of the Coldplay frontman Chris Martin, and mother of his children, Apple and Moses, the contents of her internet site haveprompted critics to dismiss the project as an unprecedented example of celebrity hubris. Some reviewers who have explored the site, www.goop.com, have been baffled by its motto, “nourish the inner aspect,” and bemused by a series of icons entitled “make”, “go”, “get”, “do”, “be” and “see” which take users to a statement containing Paltrow’s advice on how to “nourish what is real”.

The site’s name has prompted accusations of pomposity, while a feature that invites users to click on Paltrow’s autograph to sign up to a newsletter in which she offers advice on how to cook meals, go on holiday and take exercise has been widely ridiculed.

“Why is it called ‘Goop’?” asked Canada’s Globe And Mail. “Perhaps ‘Any Old Load of Rubbish’ and ‘Learn From Me, Ungrateful Peasant’ were both taken. In essence, Gwyneth would like to reach down from her aerie in north London and show you how to live, and shop, meaningfully.”

Even in Los Angeles, where exotic lifestyles like those of Paltrow and Martin – who are famously fond of yoga, maintain a strict vegetarian diet, and rarely let cheese, wheat or sugar pass their lips – are traditionally indulged, commentators described the site as “undernourished.”

“The road ahead looks bumpy for this little operation!” said the Los Angeles Times. “It’s not just that apparently no one wants to take life direction from the girl who has it all. There are also more basic technical problems, starting with the layout of the two-page site. It’s not clear why she bothered to put it up with so little content. It feels like something that won an award for Web design in 1998.”

Goop: Paltrow’s online insights

* My life is good because I am not passive about it. I want to nourish what is real, and I want to do it without wasting time ? I love being in spaces that are clean and feel nice.

* Over the years, I have tried lots of different things. I have made lots of mistakes. But I have figured some things out in the process and I would like to share them with you. Whether you want a good place to eat in London ?or some thoughts from one of my sages, Goop is a little bit of everything that makes up my life.

* Make your life good. Invest in what’s real. Cook a meal for someone you love. Pause before reacting. Clean out your space. Read something beautiful. Treat yourself to something.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Gwyneth rocks
[info]lulu2009 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 February 2009 at 02:14 pm (UTC)
Why do you journalists have to be so mean? Why shouldn't Gwyneth launch an online newsletter... Why shouldn't she do something different to acting. She isn't forcing anyone to read her newsletters, least of all the journalist who wrote this article. The web is a big place and the newletters are op int only. So if you don't like it, how about reading and signing up else where. Personally I think her notes are interesting and heartfelt. I think she is brave to put herself out there and to get her ideas onrecord, as would be any other woman who did the same thing.
Re: Gwyneth rocks
[info]dj1982 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 11:59 am (UTC)
Well Said Gwyneth
Comment
[info]laramckinnon wrote:
Thursday, 23 April 2009 at 05:48 pm (UTC)
As much as I do not have anything personal against Gwyneth Paltrow, I think that her GOOP initiative is awfully laughable. Does she realize that most people's lives are not glamourous and fabulous? I especially laugh when she describes all the posh places she's been to and how she lived a diversified life. I consider myself lucky when I get to go on a small one-week trip to Vancouver (from Ottawa) when I get my annual 3 weeks vacation from the job (for which I earned a Master's Degree). Honestly, why do famous people think that just beacuse they are in the spotlight they deserve so much attention for everything they do? I don't care what their face cream is, I don't care what their diet is, I don't care who's their favourite designer and so and so. I am so sick of seeing celebrities making the headlines, as if there are no other concerns in the world. I am sickened by the corruption and the unfairness of it all. The Occidental world is nothing but a money-grabbing, self-selling, perverted industry, and I will not suport these foolish ideas coming from people telling us that all we have to do to be happy and healthy is smile, be happy, wear sunscreen and do yoga! There is much more to it. My criticism has nothing to do with envy, as I'm perfectly content with my 60 000 annual salary. Okay, maybe Gwyneth needed a little self exploration, like a meditation session. But these kinds of reflexions should be kept to one's self. It would seem much less egocentric that way.
Gwyneth and GOOP
[info]karenlf wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 06:06 pm (UTC)
It is too easy to write off Gwyneths GOOP site as self indulgent. I think her target audience are those people that appreciate her acting and films and are also curious to find out how someone with her celebrity status manages to seemingly balance work and home life. I do not think she intends to appeal to those people that have no interest in celebrity culture. I am curious to know whether the restaurants she recommends are super expensive and if so that would be a shame. However I think I feel more insulted by the critics who suggest that if you have limited income you have no interest in your mental health and wellbeing. I am thereabouts on minimum wage and my health, wellbeing and diet are of upmost importance to me.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date