Iraq crisis: Memories of two failed wars continue to shape America’s ‘soft’ foreign policy
US would intervene only when national interests were involved
Known for his commentary on international relations and US politics, Rupert Cornwell also contributes obituaries and occasionally even a column for the sports pages. With The Independent since its launch in 1986, he was the paper's first Moscow correspondent - covering the collapse of the Soviet Union – during which time he won two British Press Awards. Previously a foreign correspondent for the Financial Times and Reuters, he has also been a diplomatic correspondent, leader writer and columnist, and has served as Washington bureau editor. In 1983 he published God's Banker, about Roberto Calvi, the Italian banker found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge.
Monday 23 June 2014
Cartoons are cruel and exaggerated, but invariably contain a grain of truth. Thus it was with the one in the Chicago Tribune last week. It depicted Barack Obama blithely pirouetting on a pedestal, dropping a globe which shatters at his feet. The pedestal bears a three-word inscription: “The Obama Doctrine”.
Unfair, to be sure, but the message is one that the President’s critics at home and not a few of America’s traditional allies abroad would agree with. Obama’s approach, as averse to military action as that of his predecessor was in favour of it, is causing nothing but trouble, they would argue – a display of fecklessness that has emboldened rival powers such as Russia and China and allowed Libya, Syria, and now Iraq, to go up in flames.
For proof of this radical shift in US foreign policy, consider two commencement speeches delivered at the West Point military academy, 12 years apart. In the first, a few months before the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, George W Bush claimed America’s right to attack pre-emptively countries considered a threat in the “war on terror”.
Thus was born the “Bush Doctrine”, instantly to mesh with the neo-conservative belief that American-style democracy was the solution to the world’s problems.
In the second, on 28 May 2014, President Obama laid out a very different set of principles to another graduating class of future army commanders. The US would intervene militarily only when core national interests were involved.
As a rule, Washington would put the emphasis on diplomacy, multilateral action and “soft power” to achieve its ends. Such, in so far as it exists, is the “Obama Doctrine”. It is not targeted at a specific area, as was the 19th-century “Monroe Doctrine” against further European expansion in the Western hemisphere. Obama’s only nod to geography has been the so-called “Pivot to Asia”. But that was a statement of intent – and unfortunately the Middle East wasn’t playing along.
The net result is a US foreign policy less assertive than that of any president (with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter) since the Second World War.
The new approach is born of two factors: the war-weariness of his country, after the two longest foreign conflicts in US history, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Obama’s own recognition of the limits of US power in an increasingly multipolar world.
Isis hijacking World Cup hashtags to promote propaganda
Iran turns on US and warns Obama to stay out of Iraq
More power for security services to counter jihadist threat
As the Sunni terror spreads, its fighters look for wives
Who are Isis? The rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant
America still owns by far the mightiest military on earth. But compared to its rivals, a re-arming Russia and especially China, its edge is shrinking.
For Obama’s critics this is abject “declinism”. America, they contend, remains the sole superpower and the nearest thing the world has to a global policeman. Instead, however, this president is squandering its power and prestige.
The US withdrawal from Iraq in 2011 and Obama’s refusal to arm the moderate opposition at an early stage of Syria’s civil war, have resulted in chaos in both countries. If the Arab Spring has turned into a bitter autumn, these critics say, that is largely because of the passivity of Obama’s administration.
Even among Republicans, despite the demands for military action from the likes of Dick Cheney and John McCain, an isolationist faction is gathering strength.
For better or worse, American foreign policy is now shaped by the memories of two failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have cost thousands of lives and trillions of dollars – and achieved next to nothing.
- 3 Alton Towers crash: Four seriously injured and 16 guests trapped as Smiler ride carriages collide
- 4 Ann Summers survey reveals the UK's favourite sex position
Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school cancer vaccination
Migrants in Kos: Photos show real tragedy after Brits abroad complain of 'awkward' holidays
British tourists complain that impoverished boat migrants are making holidays 'awkward' in Kos
Michael Gove determined to scrap the Human Rights Act – even if Scotland retains it
Threat to scrap Human Rights Act could see UK follow Nazi example, warns UN official
Church of England 'one generation away from extinction' after dramatic loss of followers
£35000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This company is a solutions / s...
£18000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Sales Executive is required t...
£35000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Are you inspired to bring new a...
£14000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity...