Iraq panel urges military pull-out by 2008
Latest in Americas
On Facebook
From the blogs
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Children Of Alcoholics week: One million children may just be the tip of the iceberg
Children Of Alcoholics week starts today. So, what are the aims for Nacoa during this important week...
Review of Being Human: ‘Being Human 1955’
Following on from an episode tinged with tragedy, this week lifted the mood with something lighter.
The US should try to pull most combat troops out of Iraq by early 2008, a high-level panel recommended today.
The eagerly-awaited report from the bipartisan Iraq Study Group called for an urgent new diplomatic offensive to stabilise the country, telling the Bush administration it must "engage constructively" with Iran and Syria.
America should reduce political, military or economic support if the government in Baghdad does not make substantial progress in providing for its own security, the 10-member group said.
The commission warned bluntly that the US faced a "grave and deteriorating" situation after nearly four years of war in Iraq which could trigger a humanitarian catastrophe if left unchecked.
The US faced seeing its global standing diminished if it did not act, it added.
"The primary mission of US forces in Iraq should evolve to one of supporting the Iraqi army, which would take over primary responsibility for combat operations," the group wrote.
"By the first quarter of 2008, subject to unexpected developments in the security situation on the ground, all combat brigades not necessary for force protection could be out of Iraq.
"At that time, US combat forces in Iraq could be deployed only in units embedded with Iraqi forces, in rapid-reaction and special operations teams and in training, equipping, advising, force protection and search and rescue."
President George Bush's current policy was "not working" and a purely military approach would not solve the problem, the report's authors said.
They insisted the US should not make an "open-ended commitment" to keep large numbers of troops in Iraq.
There was also a stark warning for the government in Baghdad that if they failed to make progress, US support would be reduced.
"We must help the Iraqis help themselves," co-chair Lee Hamilton said as the panel formally presented its 79 recommendations.
"President Bush and his National Security Team should convey a clear message to Iraqi leaders: the US will support them if they take prompt action to make progress on milestones on national reconciliation, security and improving the daily lives of Iraqis."
"If the Iraqi government does not make significant progress towards the achievement of milestones the US then should reduce its political military or economic support for the Iraq."
He added: "The US must encourage Iraqis to take responsibility for their own destiny.
"This responsible transition can allow for the reduction of the US presence in Iraq over time.
"The primary mission for US forces should evolve to one of supporting the Iraqi army, which would take over primary responsibility for combat operations."
Mr Hamilton said it was clear that the Iraqi government would need help from the US for "some time to come".
"Yet the US must make it clear to the Iraqi government that we can carry out our plans, including planned redeployments, even if the Iraqi government did not implement their planned changes," he said.
"The US must not make an open-ended commitment to keep large numbers of troops deployed in Iraq."
Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett welcomed the US report which she called a "substantial and complex piece of work" and which included input from Prime Minister Tony Blair and senior British officials.
She said: "From those discussions we get the impression that their thinking was broadly in line with our own, but obviously we need to read and digest their recommendations."
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 5 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all


Comments